Cargando…
Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites
Host and parasite evolution are closely intertwined, with selection for adaptations and counter‐adaptations forming a coevolutionary feedback loop. Coevolutionary dynamics are often difficult to intuit due to these feedbacks and are hard to demonstrate empirically in most systems. Theoretical models...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35030276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13981 |
_version_ | 1784752361732833280 |
---|---|
author | Buckingham, Lydia J. Ashby, Ben |
author_facet | Buckingham, Lydia J. Ashby, Ben |
author_sort | Buckingham, Lydia J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Host and parasite evolution are closely intertwined, with selection for adaptations and counter‐adaptations forming a coevolutionary feedback loop. Coevolutionary dynamics are often difficult to intuit due to these feedbacks and are hard to demonstrate empirically in most systems. Theoretical models have therefore played a crucial role in shaping our understanding of host–parasite coevolution. Theoretical models vary widely in their assumptions, approaches and aims, and such variety makes it difficult, especially for non‐theoreticians and those new to the field, to: (1) understand how model approaches relate to one another; (2) identify key modelling assumptions; (3) determine how model assumptions relate to biological systems; and (4) reconcile the results of different models with contrasting assumptions. In this review, we identify important model features, highlight key results and predictions and describe how these pertain to model assumptions. We carry out a literature survey of theoretical studies published since the 1950s (n = 219 papers) to support our analysis. We identify two particularly important features of models that tend to have a significant qualitative impact on the outcome of host–parasite coevolution: population dynamics and the genetic basis of infection. We also highlight the importance of other modelling features, such as stochasticity and whether time proceeds continuously or in discrete steps, that have received less attention but can drastically alter coevolutionary dynamics. We finish by summarizing recent developments in the field, specifically the trend towards greater model complexity, and discuss likely future directions for research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93055832022-07-28 Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites Buckingham, Lydia J. Ashby, Ben J Evol Biol Review Host and parasite evolution are closely intertwined, with selection for adaptations and counter‐adaptations forming a coevolutionary feedback loop. Coevolutionary dynamics are often difficult to intuit due to these feedbacks and are hard to demonstrate empirically in most systems. Theoretical models have therefore played a crucial role in shaping our understanding of host–parasite coevolution. Theoretical models vary widely in their assumptions, approaches and aims, and such variety makes it difficult, especially for non‐theoreticians and those new to the field, to: (1) understand how model approaches relate to one another; (2) identify key modelling assumptions; (3) determine how model assumptions relate to biological systems; and (4) reconcile the results of different models with contrasting assumptions. In this review, we identify important model features, highlight key results and predictions and describe how these pertain to model assumptions. We carry out a literature survey of theoretical studies published since the 1950s (n = 219 papers) to support our analysis. We identify two particularly important features of models that tend to have a significant qualitative impact on the outcome of host–parasite coevolution: population dynamics and the genetic basis of infection. We also highlight the importance of other modelling features, such as stochasticity and whether time proceeds continuously or in discrete steps, that have received less attention but can drastically alter coevolutionary dynamics. We finish by summarizing recent developments in the field, specifically the trend towards greater model complexity, and discuss likely future directions for research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-30 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9305583/ /pubmed/35030276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13981 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Buckingham, Lydia J. Ashby, Ben Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title | Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title_full | Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title_fullStr | Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title_full_unstemmed | Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title_short | Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
title_sort | coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35030276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buckinghamlydiaj coevolutionarytheoryofhostsandparasites AT ashbyben coevolutionarytheoryofhostsandparasites |