Cargando…

Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure distribution of athletes according to foot posture index (FPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2016 and May 2018, a total of 70 volunteer male athletes (mean age: 21.1±2.3 years; range, 18 to 25...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalender, Hülya, Uzuner, Kubilay, Şimşek, Deniz, Bayram, İsmail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949968
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.4904
_version_ 1784752373595373568
author Kalender, Hülya
Uzuner, Kubilay
Şimşek, Deniz
Bayram, İsmail
author_facet Kalender, Hülya
Uzuner, Kubilay
Şimşek, Deniz
Bayram, İsmail
author_sort Kalender, Hülya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure distribution of athletes according to foot posture index (FPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2016 and May 2018, a total of 70 volunteer male athletes (mean age: 21.1±2.3 years; range, 18 to 25 years) were included. The athletes were divided into three groups according to their FPI as follows: having supinated feet (Group 1, n=16), neutral/normal feet (Group 2, n=36), or pronated feet (Group 3, n=18). Ankle range of motion (ROM), muscle flexibility, ankle joint strength, and plantar pressure distribution were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences among the three groups in both right and left ankle dorsiflexion ROM (p=0.009 and p=0.003, respectively). Group 1 had significantly smaller dorsiflexion ROM than the other groups. Group 1 also showed significantly less flexibility in the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles than the other foot posture groups. Groups 2 and 3 exhibited significant differences in the maximum torque (p=0.018), maximum work (p=0.008), and total work (p=0.008) of the right plantar flexor muscles at 60°/sec angular velocity. Peak pressure measurements of the right foot were higher in Group 1, compared to Groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study may help to enhance athletic performance by providing a guide for designing training programs appropriate for athletes with different foot types to address their specific muscle flexibility and strength deficiencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93056462022-08-09 Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index Kalender, Hülya Uzuner, Kubilay Şimşek, Deniz Bayram, İsmail Turk J Phys Med Rehabil Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure distribution of athletes according to foot posture index (FPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2016 and May 2018, a total of 70 volunteer male athletes (mean age: 21.1±2.3 years; range, 18 to 25 years) were included. The athletes were divided into three groups according to their FPI as follows: having supinated feet (Group 1, n=16), neutral/normal feet (Group 2, n=36), or pronated feet (Group 3, n=18). Ankle range of motion (ROM), muscle flexibility, ankle joint strength, and plantar pressure distribution were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences among the three groups in both right and left ankle dorsiflexion ROM (p=0.009 and p=0.003, respectively). Group 1 had significantly smaller dorsiflexion ROM than the other groups. Group 1 also showed significantly less flexibility in the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles than the other foot posture groups. Groups 2 and 3 exhibited significant differences in the maximum torque (p=0.018), maximum work (p=0.008), and total work (p=0.008) of the right plantar flexor muscles at 60°/sec angular velocity. Peak pressure measurements of the right foot were higher in Group 1, compared to Groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study may help to enhance athletic performance by providing a guide for designing training programs appropriate for athletes with different foot types to address their specific muscle flexibility and strength deficiencies. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9305646/ /pubmed/35949968 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.4904 Text en Copyright © 2022, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kalender, Hülya
Uzuner, Kubilay
Şimşek, Deniz
Bayram, İsmail
Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title_full Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title_fullStr Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title_short Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
title_sort comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949968
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.4904
work_keys_str_mv AT kalenderhulya comparisonofankleforcemobilityflexibilityandplantarpressurevaluesinathletesaccordingtofootpostureindex
AT uzunerkubilay comparisonofankleforcemobilityflexibilityandplantarpressurevaluesinathletesaccordingtofootpostureindex
AT simsekdeniz comparisonofankleforcemobilityflexibilityandplantarpressurevaluesinathletesaccordingtofootpostureindex
AT bayramismail comparisonofankleforcemobilityflexibilityandplantarpressurevaluesinathletesaccordingtofootpostureindex