Cargando…

Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program is effective on pain and functioning in patients with type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1) of the hand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cömertoğlu, İsmail, Güneş, Seçilay, Elhan, Atilla Halil, Üstüner, Evren, Kutlay, Şehim, Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.9074
_version_ 1784752374461497344
author Cömertoğlu, İsmail
Güneş, Seçilay
Elhan, Atilla Halil
Üstüner, Evren
Kutlay, Şehim
Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile
author_facet Cömertoğlu, İsmail
Güneş, Seçilay
Elhan, Atilla Halil
Üstüner, Evren
Kutlay, Şehim
Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile
author_sort Cömertoğlu, İsmail
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program is effective on pain and functioning in patients with type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1) of the hand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and January 2015, a total of 32 patients (16 males, 16 females; mean age: 50.1±13.1 years; range, 25 to 75 years) were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The control group (n=16) received a conventional rehabilitation program consisting of physical modalities, exercises, and occupational therapy, whereas the PEMF group (n=16) received additional PEMF (8 Hz, 3.2 mT) to the affected hand. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were grip and pinch strength, hand edema, hand dexterity, and hand activities. All patients received 20 therapy sessions (five sessions/week, four weeks in total) and were evaluated before and after the therapy and at the first-month follow-up. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes (p<0.05) after the therapy and at follow-up. When the groups were compared in terms of improvements in assessment parameters, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the outcomes (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The PEMF in addition to conventional rehabilitation program did not provide additional benefit for pain and hand functions in CRPS-1. Future studies using different application parameters such as frequency, intensity, duration, and route may provide a better understanding of the role of PEMF in CRPS-1 treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93056492022-08-09 Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial Cömertoğlu, İsmail Güneş, Seçilay Elhan, Atilla Halil Üstüner, Evren Kutlay, Şehim Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile Turk J Phys Med Rehabil Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program is effective on pain and functioning in patients with type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1) of the hand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and January 2015, a total of 32 patients (16 males, 16 females; mean age: 50.1±13.1 years; range, 25 to 75 years) were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The control group (n=16) received a conventional rehabilitation program consisting of physical modalities, exercises, and occupational therapy, whereas the PEMF group (n=16) received additional PEMF (8 Hz, 3.2 mT) to the affected hand. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were grip and pinch strength, hand edema, hand dexterity, and hand activities. All patients received 20 therapy sessions (five sessions/week, four weeks in total) and were evaluated before and after the therapy and at the first-month follow-up. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes (p<0.05) after the therapy and at follow-up. When the groups were compared in terms of improvements in assessment parameters, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the outcomes (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The PEMF in addition to conventional rehabilitation program did not provide additional benefit for pain and hand functions in CRPS-1. Future studies using different application parameters such as frequency, intensity, duration, and route may provide a better understanding of the role of PEMF in CRPS-1 treatment. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9305649/ /pubmed/35949961 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.9074 Text en Copyright © 2022, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cömertoğlu, İsmail
Güneş, Seçilay
Elhan, Atilla Halil
Üstüner, Evren
Kutlay, Şehim
Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile
Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a randomized-controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.9074
work_keys_str_mv AT comertogluismail effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gunessecilay effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elhanatillahalil effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ustunerevren effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kutlaysehim effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kucukdeveciayseadile effectivenessofpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyinthemanagementofcomplexregionalpainsyndrometype1arandomizedcontrolledtrial