Cargando…
Cemented versus screw‐retained zirconia‐based single‐implant restorations: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
OBJECTIVES: To compare cemented and screw‐retained one‐piece zirconia‐based restorations in terms of clinical, radiographic, and technical outcomes 5 years after insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty‐four patients with single‐tooth implants were randomly restored with either a cemented lithium di...
Autores principales: | Lamperti, Sofia T., Wolleb, Karin, Hämmerle, Christoph H.F., Jung, Ronald E., Hüsler, Jürg, Thoma, Daniel S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35051314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13895 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Five‐year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw‐retained zirconia‐based implant‐supported single crowns
por: Kraus, Riccardo D., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Survey of Screw-Retained versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations in Saudi Arabia
por: Makke, Alaa, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained
por: Lee, Jae-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The effect of aging on the fracture resistance of different types of screw-cement-retained implant-supported zirconia-based restorations
por: Sahebi, Safoora, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever: 5‐Year results of a randomized clinical trial
por: Thoma, Daniel S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)