Cargando…
What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can be effectively managed using a pessary. A scoping review found that pessary self-management appears to benefit women with no increased risk. Despite this, many are unwilling to self-manage their pessary. At present, there is a lack of understanding about...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061655 |
_version_ | 1784752407040753664 |
---|---|
author | Dwyer, Lucy Dowding, Dawn Kearney, Rohna |
author_facet | Dwyer, Lucy Dowding, Dawn Kearney, Rohna |
author_sort | Dwyer, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can be effectively managed using a pessary. A scoping review found that pessary self-management appears to benefit women with no increased risk. Despite this, many are unwilling to self-manage their pessary. At present, there is a lack of understanding about what affects willingness to self-manage a pessary. However, there may be relevant, transferable findings from other literature about barriers to the self-management of other chronic conditions. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will be conducted and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a guide for the systematic review of qualitative data. A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo will be undertaken to identify relevant articles that meet the eligibility criteria using the search terms ‘Women’, ‘Woman’ ‘Female,’ ‘Chronic’, ‘Long-term’, ‘Disease’, ‘Illness’, ‘Condition’ ‘Health,’ ‘Self-management,’ ‘Qualitative,’ ‘Barrier’ and ‘Facilitator’. A hand search of the reference list of non-original research identified during the search but excluded will be conducted for additional publications, which meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies published before 2005 and those not available in English will be excluded. Data relevant to the topic will be extracted and critical appraisal of all included publications undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical or Health Research Authority approval is required to undertake the systematic review. The systematic review findings will be disseminated by publication. The findings will also inform subsequent exploratory work regarding pessary self-management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022327643. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93057982022-08-11 What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review Dwyer, Lucy Dowding, Dawn Kearney, Rohna BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can be effectively managed using a pessary. A scoping review found that pessary self-management appears to benefit women with no increased risk. Despite this, many are unwilling to self-manage their pessary. At present, there is a lack of understanding about what affects willingness to self-manage a pessary. However, there may be relevant, transferable findings from other literature about barriers to the self-management of other chronic conditions. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will be conducted and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a guide for the systematic review of qualitative data. A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo will be undertaken to identify relevant articles that meet the eligibility criteria using the search terms ‘Women’, ‘Woman’ ‘Female,’ ‘Chronic’, ‘Long-term’, ‘Disease’, ‘Illness’, ‘Condition’ ‘Health,’ ‘Self-management,’ ‘Qualitative,’ ‘Barrier’ and ‘Facilitator’. A hand search of the reference list of non-original research identified during the search but excluded will be conducted for additional publications, which meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies published before 2005 and those not available in English will be excluded. Data relevant to the topic will be extracted and critical appraisal of all included publications undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical or Health Research Authority approval is required to undertake the systematic review. The systematic review findings will be disseminated by publication. The findings will also inform subsequent exploratory work regarding pessary self-management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022327643. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9305798/ /pubmed/35858726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061655 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Dwyer, Lucy Dowding, Dawn Kearney, Rohna What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title | What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title_full | What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title_short | What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review |
title_sort | what are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? a systematic review |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dwyerlucy whatarethebarriersandfacilitatorstoselfmanagementofchronicconditionsreportedbywomenasystematicreview AT dowdingdawn whatarethebarriersandfacilitatorstoselfmanagementofchronicconditionsreportedbywomenasystematicreview AT kearneyrohna whatarethebarriersandfacilitatorstoselfmanagementofchronicconditionsreportedbywomenasystematicreview |