Cargando…

Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK

OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Heather Ann, Jain, Suneil, Peedell, Clive, Edwards, Albert, Thomas, James Andrew, Das, Prantik, Hansson Hedblom, Amanda, Woodward, Emily, Saunders, Rhodri, Bahl, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506
_version_ 1784752408555945984
author Payne, Heather Ann
Jain, Suneil
Peedell, Clive
Edwards, Albert
Thomas, James Andrew
Das, Prantik
Hansson Hedblom, Amanda
Woodward, Emily
Saunders, Rhodri
Bahl, Amit
author_facet Payne, Heather Ann
Jain, Suneil
Peedell, Clive
Edwards, Albert
Thomas, James Andrew
Das, Prantik
Hansson Hedblom, Amanda
Woodward, Emily
Saunders, Rhodri
Bahl, Amit
author_sort Payne, Heather Ann
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93058052022-08-11 Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK Payne, Heather Ann Jain, Suneil Peedell, Clive Edwards, Albert Thomas, James Andrew Das, Prantik Hansson Hedblom, Amanda Woodward, Emily Saunders, Rhodri Bahl, Amit BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9305805/ /pubmed/35858729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Payne, Heather Ann
Jain, Suneil
Peedell, Clive
Edwards, Albert
Thomas, James Andrew
Das, Prantik
Hansson Hedblom, Amanda
Woodward, Emily
Saunders, Rhodri
Bahl, Amit
Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title_full Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title_fullStr Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title_short Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
title_sort delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the uk
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506
work_keys_str_mv AT payneheatherann delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT jainsuneil delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT peedellclive delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT edwardsalbert delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT thomasjamesandrew delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT dasprantik delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT hanssonhedblomamanda delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT woodwardemily delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT saundersrhodri delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk
AT bahlamit delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk