Cargando…
Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK
OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506 |
_version_ | 1784752408555945984 |
---|---|
author | Payne, Heather Ann Jain, Suneil Peedell, Clive Edwards, Albert Thomas, James Andrew Das, Prantik Hansson Hedblom, Amanda Woodward, Emily Saunders, Rhodri Bahl, Amit |
author_facet | Payne, Heather Ann Jain, Suneil Peedell, Clive Edwards, Albert Thomas, James Andrew Das, Prantik Hansson Hedblom, Amanda Woodward, Emily Saunders, Rhodri Bahl, Amit |
author_sort | Payne, Heather Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93058052022-08-11 Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK Payne, Heather Ann Jain, Suneil Peedell, Clive Edwards, Albert Thomas, James Andrew Das, Prantik Hansson Hedblom, Amanda Woodward, Emily Saunders, Rhodri Bahl, Amit BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9305805/ /pubmed/35858729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Oncology Payne, Heather Ann Jain, Suneil Peedell, Clive Edwards, Albert Thomas, James Andrew Das, Prantik Hansson Hedblom, Amanda Woodward, Emily Saunders, Rhodri Bahl, Amit Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title | Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title_full | Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title_fullStr | Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title_short | Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK |
title_sort | delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the uk |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT payneheatherann delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT jainsuneil delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT peedellclive delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT edwardsalbert delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT thomasjamesandrew delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT dasprantik delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT hanssonhedblomamanda delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT woodwardemily delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT saundersrhodri delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk AT bahlamit delphistudytoidentifyconsensusonpatientselectionforhydrogelrectalspaceruseduringradiationtherapyforprostatecancerintheuk |