Cargando…

Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, Ailsa R, Astbury, Nerys M, Goddard, Lucy, Hajizadeh, Anisa, Seeber, Philippa, Crawley, Bruce, Aveyard, Paul, Jebb, Susan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177
_version_ 1784752409063456768
author Butler, Ailsa R
Astbury, Nerys M
Goddard, Lucy
Hajizadeh, Anisa
Seeber, Philippa
Crawley, Bruce
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A
author_facet Butler, Ailsa R
Astbury, Nerys M
Goddard, Lucy
Hajizadeh, Anisa
Seeber, Philippa
Crawley, Bruce
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A
author_sort Butler, Ailsa R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of the public including people living with obesity, researchers, healthcare professionals and policy-makers in all stages of this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Top 10 research questions to be prioritised in future obesity and weight-related research. RESULTS: Survey 1 produced 941 questions, from 278 respondents. Of these, 49 questions held satisfactory evidence in the scientific literature and 149 were out of scope. The remaining 743 questions were, where necessary, amalgamated and rephrased, into a list of 149 unique and unanswered questions. In the second survey, 405 respondents ranked the questions in order of importance. During the workshop, a subset of 38 survey respondents and stakeholders, agreed a final list of 10 priority research questions through small and large group consultation and consensus. The top 10 priority research questions covered: the role of the obesogenic environment; effective weight loss and maintenance strategies; prevention in children; effective prevention and treatment policies; the role of the food industry; access to and affordability of a healthy diet; sociocultural factors associated with weight; the biology of appetite and food intake; and long-term health modelling for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic and transparent process identified 149 unique and unanswered questions in the field of obesity and weight-related research culminating in a consensus among relevant stakeholders on 10 research priorities. Targeted research funding in these areas of top priority would lead to needed and impactful knowledge generation for the field of obesity and weight regulation and thereby improve population health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93058082022-08-11 Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process Butler, Ailsa R Astbury, Nerys M Goddard, Lucy Hajizadeh, Anisa Seeber, Philippa Crawley, Bruce Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of the public including people living with obesity, researchers, healthcare professionals and policy-makers in all stages of this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Top 10 research questions to be prioritised in future obesity and weight-related research. RESULTS: Survey 1 produced 941 questions, from 278 respondents. Of these, 49 questions held satisfactory evidence in the scientific literature and 149 were out of scope. The remaining 743 questions were, where necessary, amalgamated and rephrased, into a list of 149 unique and unanswered questions. In the second survey, 405 respondents ranked the questions in order of importance. During the workshop, a subset of 38 survey respondents and stakeholders, agreed a final list of 10 priority research questions through small and large group consultation and consensus. The top 10 priority research questions covered: the role of the obesogenic environment; effective weight loss and maintenance strategies; prevention in children; effective prevention and treatment policies; the role of the food industry; access to and affordability of a healthy diet; sociocultural factors associated with weight; the biology of appetite and food intake; and long-term health modelling for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic and transparent process identified 149 unique and unanswered questions in the field of obesity and weight-related research culminating in a consensus among relevant stakeholders on 10 research priorities. Targeted research funding in these areas of top priority would lead to needed and impactful knowledge generation for the field of obesity and weight regulation and thereby improve population health. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9305808/ /pubmed/35858732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Butler, Ailsa R
Astbury, Nerys M
Goddard, Lucy
Hajizadeh, Anisa
Seeber, Philippa
Crawley, Bruce
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A
Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title_full Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title_fullStr Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title_full_unstemmed Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title_short Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
title_sort setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (power): a stakeholder priority setting process
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177
work_keys_str_mv AT butlerailsar settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT astburynerysm settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT goddardlucy settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT hajizadehanisa settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT seeberphilippa settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT crawleybruce settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT aveyardpaul settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess
AT jebbsusana settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess