Cargando…
Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process
OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177 |
_version_ | 1784752409063456768 |
---|---|
author | Butler, Ailsa R Astbury, Nerys M Goddard, Lucy Hajizadeh, Anisa Seeber, Philippa Crawley, Bruce Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A |
author_facet | Butler, Ailsa R Astbury, Nerys M Goddard, Lucy Hajizadeh, Anisa Seeber, Philippa Crawley, Bruce Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A |
author_sort | Butler, Ailsa R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of the public including people living with obesity, researchers, healthcare professionals and policy-makers in all stages of this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Top 10 research questions to be prioritised in future obesity and weight-related research. RESULTS: Survey 1 produced 941 questions, from 278 respondents. Of these, 49 questions held satisfactory evidence in the scientific literature and 149 were out of scope. The remaining 743 questions were, where necessary, amalgamated and rephrased, into a list of 149 unique and unanswered questions. In the second survey, 405 respondents ranked the questions in order of importance. During the workshop, a subset of 38 survey respondents and stakeholders, agreed a final list of 10 priority research questions through small and large group consultation and consensus. The top 10 priority research questions covered: the role of the obesogenic environment; effective weight loss and maintenance strategies; prevention in children; effective prevention and treatment policies; the role of the food industry; access to and affordability of a healthy diet; sociocultural factors associated with weight; the biology of appetite and food intake; and long-term health modelling for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic and transparent process identified 149 unique and unanswered questions in the field of obesity and weight-related research culminating in a consensus among relevant stakeholders on 10 research priorities. Targeted research funding in these areas of top priority would lead to needed and impactful knowledge generation for the field of obesity and weight regulation and thereby improve population health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93058082022-08-11 Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process Butler, Ailsa R Astbury, Nerys M Goddard, Lucy Hajizadeh, Anisa Seeber, Philippa Crawley, Bruce Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise the most impactful, unanswered questions for obesity and weight-related research. DESIGN: Prioritisation exercise of research questions using online surveys and an independently facilitated workshop. SETTING: Online/virtual. PARTICIPANTS: We involved members of the public including people living with obesity, researchers, healthcare professionals and policy-makers in all stages of this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Top 10 research questions to be prioritised in future obesity and weight-related research. RESULTS: Survey 1 produced 941 questions, from 278 respondents. Of these, 49 questions held satisfactory evidence in the scientific literature and 149 were out of scope. The remaining 743 questions were, where necessary, amalgamated and rephrased, into a list of 149 unique and unanswered questions. In the second survey, 405 respondents ranked the questions in order of importance. During the workshop, a subset of 38 survey respondents and stakeholders, agreed a final list of 10 priority research questions through small and large group consultation and consensus. The top 10 priority research questions covered: the role of the obesogenic environment; effective weight loss and maintenance strategies; prevention in children; effective prevention and treatment policies; the role of the food industry; access to and affordability of a healthy diet; sociocultural factors associated with weight; the biology of appetite and food intake; and long-term health modelling for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic and transparent process identified 149 unique and unanswered questions in the field of obesity and weight-related research culminating in a consensus among relevant stakeholders on 10 research priorities. Targeted research funding in these areas of top priority would lead to needed and impactful knowledge generation for the field of obesity and weight regulation and thereby improve population health. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9305808/ /pubmed/35858732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Butler, Ailsa R Astbury, Nerys M Goddard, Lucy Hajizadeh, Anisa Seeber, Philippa Crawley, Bruce Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title | Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title_full | Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title_fullStr | Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title_full_unstemmed | Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title_short | Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process |
title_sort | setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (power): a stakeholder priority setting process |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butlerailsar settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT astburynerysm settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT goddardlucy settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT hajizadehanisa settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT seeberphilippa settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT crawleybruce settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT aveyardpaul settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess AT jebbsusana settingthetop10prioritiesforobesityandweightrelatedresearchpowerastakeholderprioritysettingprocess |