Cargando…
Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices
BACKGROUND: A relation between the left ventricular assist device inflow cannula (IC) malposition and pump thrombus has been reported. This study aimed to investigate if the pump position, derived from chest X‐rays in HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients, correlates with neurological dysfunction (ND), ischemi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34978722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14165 |
_version_ | 1784752418677850112 |
---|---|
author | Schlöglhofer, Thomas Aigner, Philipp Migas, Marcel Beitzke, Dietrich Dimitrov, Kamen Wittmann, Franziska Riebandt, Julia Granegger, Marcus Wiedemann, Dominik Laufer, Günther Moscato, Francesco Schima, Heinrich Zimpfer, Daniel |
author_facet | Schlöglhofer, Thomas Aigner, Philipp Migas, Marcel Beitzke, Dietrich Dimitrov, Kamen Wittmann, Franziska Riebandt, Julia Granegger, Marcus Wiedemann, Dominik Laufer, Günther Moscato, Francesco Schima, Heinrich Zimpfer, Daniel |
author_sort | Schlöglhofer, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A relation between the left ventricular assist device inflow cannula (IC) malposition and pump thrombus has been reported. This study aimed to investigate if the pump position, derived from chest X‐rays in HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients, correlates with neurological dysfunction (ND), ischemic stroke (IS), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) and survival. METHODS: This analysis was performed on routinely acquired X‐rays of 42 patients implanted with a HM3 between 2014 and 2017. Device position was quantified in patients with and without ND from frontal and lateral X‐rays characterizing the IC and pump in relation to spine, diaphragm or horizontal line. The primary end‐point was freedom from stroke and survival one‐year after HM3 implantation stratified by pump position. RESULTS: The analysis of X‐rays, 33.5 (41.0) days postoperative, revealed a significant smaller IC angle of HM3 patients with ND versus no ND (0.1° ± 14.0° vs. 12.9° ± 10.1°, p = 0.005). Additionally, the IC angle in the frontal view, IS: 4.1 (20.9)° versus no IS: 13.8 (7.5)°, p = 0.004 was significantly smaller for HM3 patients with IS. Using receiver operating characteristics derived cut‐off, IC angle <10° provided 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity (C‐statistic = 0.85) for predicting IS. Stratified by IC angle, freedom from IS at 12 months was 100% (>10°) and 60% (<10°) respectively (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in any end‐point between patients with and without HS. One‐year survival was significantly higher in patients with IC angle >10° versus <10° (100% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: IC malposition derived from standard chest X‐rays serves as a risk factor for ND, IS and worse survival in HM3 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93058572022-07-28 Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices Schlöglhofer, Thomas Aigner, Philipp Migas, Marcel Beitzke, Dietrich Dimitrov, Kamen Wittmann, Franziska Riebandt, Julia Granegger, Marcus Wiedemann, Dominik Laufer, Günther Moscato, Francesco Schima, Heinrich Zimpfer, Daniel Artif Organs Main Text BACKGROUND: A relation between the left ventricular assist device inflow cannula (IC) malposition and pump thrombus has been reported. This study aimed to investigate if the pump position, derived from chest X‐rays in HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients, correlates with neurological dysfunction (ND), ischemic stroke (IS), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) and survival. METHODS: This analysis was performed on routinely acquired X‐rays of 42 patients implanted with a HM3 between 2014 and 2017. Device position was quantified in patients with and without ND from frontal and lateral X‐rays characterizing the IC and pump in relation to spine, diaphragm or horizontal line. The primary end‐point was freedom from stroke and survival one‐year after HM3 implantation stratified by pump position. RESULTS: The analysis of X‐rays, 33.5 (41.0) days postoperative, revealed a significant smaller IC angle of HM3 patients with ND versus no ND (0.1° ± 14.0° vs. 12.9° ± 10.1°, p = 0.005). Additionally, the IC angle in the frontal view, IS: 4.1 (20.9)° versus no IS: 13.8 (7.5)°, p = 0.004 was significantly smaller for HM3 patients with IS. Using receiver operating characteristics derived cut‐off, IC angle <10° provided 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity (C‐statistic = 0.85) for predicting IS. Stratified by IC angle, freedom from IS at 12 months was 100% (>10°) and 60% (<10°) respectively (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in any end‐point between patients with and without HS. One‐year survival was significantly higher in patients with IC angle >10° versus <10° (100% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: IC malposition derived from standard chest X‐rays serves as a risk factor for ND, IS and worse survival in HM3 patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-09 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9305857/ /pubmed/34978722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14165 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Main Text Schlöglhofer, Thomas Aigner, Philipp Migas, Marcel Beitzke, Dietrich Dimitrov, Kamen Wittmann, Franziska Riebandt, Julia Granegger, Marcus Wiedemann, Dominik Laufer, Günther Moscato, Francesco Schima, Heinrich Zimpfer, Daniel Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title | Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title_full | Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title_fullStr | Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title_short | Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
title_sort | inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with heartmate 3 left ventricular assist devices |
topic | Main Text |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34978722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schloglhoferthomas inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT aignerphilipp inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT migasmarcel inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT beitzkedietrich inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT dimitrovkamen inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT wittmannfranziska inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT riebandtjulia inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT graneggermarcus inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT wiedemanndominik inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT laufergunther inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT moscatofrancesco inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT schimaheinrich inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices AT zimpferdaniel inflowcannulapositionasriskfactorforstrokeinpatientswithheartmate3leftventricularassistdevices |