Cargando…

Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a real‐time dynamic navigation system applied in zygomatic implant (ZI) surgery and summarize device‐related negative events and their management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who presented with severely maxillary atrophy or maxillary defects and received dyna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yiqun, Tao, Baoxin, Lan, Kengliang, Shen, Yihan, Huang, Wei, Wang, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13897
_version_ 1784752420846305280
author Wu, Yiqun
Tao, Baoxin
Lan, Kengliang
Shen, Yihan
Huang, Wei
Wang, Feng
author_facet Wu, Yiqun
Tao, Baoxin
Lan, Kengliang
Shen, Yihan
Huang, Wei
Wang, Feng
author_sort Wu, Yiqun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a real‐time dynamic navigation system applied in zygomatic implant (ZI) surgery and summarize device‐related negative events and their management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who presented with severely maxillary atrophy or maxillary defects and received dynamic navigation‐supported ZI surgery were included. The deviations of entry, exit, and angle were measured after image data fusion. A linear mixed‐effects model was used. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Device‐related negative events and their management were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty‐one zygomatic implants (ZIs) with navigation‐guided placement were planned in 74 consecutive patients between Jan 2015 and Aug 2020. Among them, 71 patients with 221 ZIs received navigation‐guided surgery finally. The deviations in entry, exit, and angle were 1.57 ± 0.71 mm, 2.1 ± 0.94 mm and 2.68 ± 1.25 degrees, respectively. Significant differences were found in entry and exit deviation according to the number of ZIs in the zygomata (p = .03 and .00, respectively). Patients with atrophic maxillary or maxillary defects showed a significant difference in exit deviation (p = .01). A total of 28 device‐related negative events occurred, and one resulted in 2 ZI failures due to implant malposition. The overall survival rate of ZIs was 98.64%, and the mean follow‐up time was 24.11 months (Standard Deviation [SD]: 12.62). CONCLUSIONS: The navigation‐supported ZI implantation is an accurate and reliable surgical approach. However, relevant technical negative events in the navigation process are worthy of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93058662022-07-28 Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement Wu, Yiqun Tao, Baoxin Lan, Kengliang Shen, Yihan Huang, Wei Wang, Feng Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a real‐time dynamic navigation system applied in zygomatic implant (ZI) surgery and summarize device‐related negative events and their management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who presented with severely maxillary atrophy or maxillary defects and received dynamic navigation‐supported ZI surgery were included. The deviations of entry, exit, and angle were measured after image data fusion. A linear mixed‐effects model was used. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Device‐related negative events and their management were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty‐one zygomatic implants (ZIs) with navigation‐guided placement were planned in 74 consecutive patients between Jan 2015 and Aug 2020. Among them, 71 patients with 221 ZIs received navigation‐guided surgery finally. The deviations in entry, exit, and angle were 1.57 ± 0.71 mm, 2.1 ± 0.94 mm and 2.68 ± 1.25 degrees, respectively. Significant differences were found in entry and exit deviation according to the number of ZIs in the zygomata (p = .03 and .00, respectively). Patients with atrophic maxillary or maxillary defects showed a significant difference in exit deviation (p = .01). A total of 28 device‐related negative events occurred, and one resulted in 2 ZI failures due to implant malposition. The overall survival rate of ZIs was 98.64%, and the mean follow‐up time was 24.11 months (Standard Deviation [SD]: 12.62). CONCLUSIONS: The navigation‐supported ZI implantation is an accurate and reliable surgical approach. However, relevant technical negative events in the navigation process are worthy of attention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-15 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9305866/ /pubmed/35113463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13897 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wu, Yiqun
Tao, Baoxin
Lan, Kengliang
Shen, Yihan
Huang, Wei
Wang, Feng
Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title_full Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title_fullStr Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title_short Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
title_sort reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13897
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyiqun reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement
AT taobaoxin reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement
AT lankengliang reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement
AT shenyihan reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement
AT huangwei reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement
AT wangfeng reliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicnavigationforzygomaticimplantplacement