Cargando…

Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus

The Wound Healing Foundation (WHF) recognised a need for an unbiased consensus on the best treatment of chronic wounds. A panel of 13 experts were invited to a virtual meeting which took place on 27 March 2021. The proceedings were organised in the sub‐sections diagnosis, debridement, infection cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksson, Elof, Liu, Paul Y., Schultz, Gregory S., Martins‐Green, Manuela M., Tanaka, Rica, Weir, Dot, Gould, Lisa J., Armstrong, David G., Gibbons, Gary W., Wolcott, Randy, Olutoye, Oluyinka O., Kirsner, Robert S., Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12994
_version_ 1784752441318703104
author Eriksson, Elof
Liu, Paul Y.
Schultz, Gregory S.
Martins‐Green, Manuela M.
Tanaka, Rica
Weir, Dot
Gould, Lisa J.
Armstrong, David G.
Gibbons, Gary W.
Wolcott, Randy
Olutoye, Oluyinka O.
Kirsner, Robert S.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
author_facet Eriksson, Elof
Liu, Paul Y.
Schultz, Gregory S.
Martins‐Green, Manuela M.
Tanaka, Rica
Weir, Dot
Gould, Lisa J.
Armstrong, David G.
Gibbons, Gary W.
Wolcott, Randy
Olutoye, Oluyinka O.
Kirsner, Robert S.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
author_sort Eriksson, Elof
collection PubMed
description The Wound Healing Foundation (WHF) recognised a need for an unbiased consensus on the best treatment of chronic wounds. A panel of 13 experts were invited to a virtual meeting which took place on 27 March 2021. The proceedings were organised in the sub‐sections diagnosis, debridement, infection control, dressings, grafting, pain management, oxygen treatment, outcomes and future needs. Eighty percent or better concurrence among the panellists was considered a consensus. A large number of critical questions were discussed and agreed upon. Important takeaways included that wound care needs to be simplified to a point that it can be delivered by the patient or the patient's family. Another one was that telemonitoring, which has proved very useful during the COVID‐19 pandemic, can help reduce the frequency of interventions by a visiting nurse or a wound care center. Defining patient expectations is critical to designing a successful treatment. Patient outcomes might include wound specific outcomes such as time to heal, wound size reduction, as well as improvement in quality of life. For those patients with expectations of healing, an aggressive approach to achieve that goal is recommended. When healing is not an expectation, such as in patients receiving palliative wound care, outcomes might include pain reduction, exudate management, odour management and/or other quality of life benefits to wound care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93059502022-07-28 Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus Eriksson, Elof Liu, Paul Y. Schultz, Gregory S. Martins‐Green, Manuela M. Tanaka, Rica Weir, Dot Gould, Lisa J. Armstrong, David G. Gibbons, Gary W. Wolcott, Randy Olutoye, Oluyinka O. Kirsner, Robert S. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. Wound Repair Regen Perspective Articles The Wound Healing Foundation (WHF) recognised a need for an unbiased consensus on the best treatment of chronic wounds. A panel of 13 experts were invited to a virtual meeting which took place on 27 March 2021. The proceedings were organised in the sub‐sections diagnosis, debridement, infection control, dressings, grafting, pain management, oxygen treatment, outcomes and future needs. Eighty percent or better concurrence among the panellists was considered a consensus. A large number of critical questions were discussed and agreed upon. Important takeaways included that wound care needs to be simplified to a point that it can be delivered by the patient or the patient's family. Another one was that telemonitoring, which has proved very useful during the COVID‐19 pandemic, can help reduce the frequency of interventions by a visiting nurse or a wound care center. Defining patient expectations is critical to designing a successful treatment. Patient outcomes might include wound specific outcomes such as time to heal, wound size reduction, as well as improvement in quality of life. For those patients with expectations of healing, an aggressive approach to achieve that goal is recommended. When healing is not an expectation, such as in patients receiving palliative wound care, outcomes might include pain reduction, exudate management, odour management and/or other quality of life benefits to wound care. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-02-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9305950/ /pubmed/35130362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12994 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspective Articles
Eriksson, Elof
Liu, Paul Y.
Schultz, Gregory S.
Martins‐Green, Manuela M.
Tanaka, Rica
Weir, Dot
Gould, Lisa J.
Armstrong, David G.
Gibbons, Gary W.
Wolcott, Randy
Olutoye, Oluyinka O.
Kirsner, Robert S.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title_full Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title_fullStr Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title_full_unstemmed Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title_short Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
title_sort chronic wounds: treatment consensus
topic Perspective Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12994
work_keys_str_mv AT erikssonelof chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT liupauly chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT schultzgregorys chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT martinsgreenmanuelam chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT tanakarica chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT weirdot chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT gouldlisaj chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT armstrongdavidg chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT gibbonsgaryw chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT wolcottrandy chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT olutoyeoluyinkao chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT kirsnerroberts chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus
AT gurtnergeoffreyc chronicwoundstreatmentconsensus