Cargando…

Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit

BACKGROUND: A large number of CT brain (CTB) scans are ordered in the ED for older patients with a confirmed or possible head strike but no ongoing symptoms of a head injury. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Charlene, Beavers, Jonathan, Pham, Jonathan, Hackett, Liam, Miller, Joseph, Buntine, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03284-0
_version_ 1784752471779835904
author Lee, Charlene
Beavers, Jonathan
Pham, Jonathan
Hackett, Liam
Miller, Joseph
Buntine, Paul
author_facet Lee, Charlene
Beavers, Jonathan
Pham, Jonathan
Hackett, Liam
Miller, Joseph
Buntine, Paul
author_sort Lee, Charlene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large number of CT brain (CTB) scans are ordered in the ED for older patients with a confirmed or possible head strike but no ongoing symptoms of a head injury. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist clinician assessment of the need for CTB following minimal trauma fall in patients presenting from residential aged care facilities to a major metropolitan emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study was conducted as a pre- and post-intervention retrospective audit. The intervention involved implementation of a decision support tool to help clinicians assess patients presenting to the ED following a fall. The tool integrated the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) in conjunction with a simplified set of inclusion criteria to help clinicians define a minimum threshold for a “minor head injury”. Outcome data pertaining to CT brain ordering practices and results were compared over symmetrical 3-month time periods pre- and post-intervention in 2 consecutive years. RESULTS: The study included 233 patients in the pre-intervention arm and 241 in the post-intervention arm. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There was a 20% reduction in the total number of CTB scans ordered following tool implementation, with 134 (57.0%) scans in the pre-intervention group and 90 (37.3%) in the post-intervention group (p <  0.01). The diagnostic yield in the pre- and post-intervention groups was 3.7 and 5.6% respectively (p = 0.52). No variation was observed in medical management between groups, and no patients in either group underwent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the CCHR supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria appeared to safely reduce the number of CTB scans performed in residential aged care facility residents presenting to an ED after a fall, with no associated adverse outcomes. A larger study across multiple centres is required to determine widespread efficacy and safety of this tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93060922022-07-23 Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit Lee, Charlene Beavers, Jonathan Pham, Jonathan Hackett, Liam Miller, Joseph Buntine, Paul BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: A large number of CT brain (CTB) scans are ordered in the ED for older patients with a confirmed or possible head strike but no ongoing symptoms of a head injury. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist clinician assessment of the need for CTB following minimal trauma fall in patients presenting from residential aged care facilities to a major metropolitan emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study was conducted as a pre- and post-intervention retrospective audit. The intervention involved implementation of a decision support tool to help clinicians assess patients presenting to the ED following a fall. The tool integrated the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) in conjunction with a simplified set of inclusion criteria to help clinicians define a minimum threshold for a “minor head injury”. Outcome data pertaining to CT brain ordering practices and results were compared over symmetrical 3-month time periods pre- and post-intervention in 2 consecutive years. RESULTS: The study included 233 patients in the pre-intervention arm and 241 in the post-intervention arm. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There was a 20% reduction in the total number of CTB scans ordered following tool implementation, with 134 (57.0%) scans in the pre-intervention group and 90 (37.3%) in the post-intervention group (p <  0.01). The diagnostic yield in the pre- and post-intervention groups was 3.7 and 5.6% respectively (p = 0.52). No variation was observed in medical management between groups, and no patients in either group underwent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the CCHR supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria appeared to safely reduce the number of CTB scans performed in residential aged care facility residents presenting to an ED after a fall, with no associated adverse outcomes. A larger study across multiple centres is required to determine widespread efficacy and safety of this tool. BioMed Central 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9306092/ /pubmed/35864470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03284-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Charlene
Beavers, Jonathan
Pham, Jonathan
Hackett, Liam
Miller, Joseph
Buntine, Paul
Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title_full Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title_fullStr Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title_short Impact of the Canadian CT head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
title_sort impact of the canadian ct head rule supplemented by the original published minimum inclusion criteria to assist emergency department clinicians’ assessment of patients presenting post fall from residential aged care: a retrospective audit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03284-0
work_keys_str_mv AT leecharlene impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit
AT beaversjonathan impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit
AT phamjonathan impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit
AT hackettliam impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit
AT millerjoseph impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit
AT buntinepaul impactofthecanadianctheadrulesupplementedbytheoriginalpublishedminimuminclusioncriteriatoassistemergencydepartmentcliniciansassessmentofpatientspresentingpostfallfromresidentialagedcarearetrospectiveaudit