Cargando…

Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol

BACKGROUND: Even a small change in the pressure gradient between the venous system and the right atrium can have significant hemodynamic effects. Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) is the driving force of the venous system. As a result, MSFP has a significant effect on cardiac output. We aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zucker, Maayan, Kagan, Gregory, Adi, Nimrod, Ronel, Ilai, Matot, Idit, Zac, Lilach, Goren, Or
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8
_version_ 1784752472336629760
author Zucker, Maayan
Kagan, Gregory
Adi, Nimrod
Ronel, Ilai
Matot, Idit
Zac, Lilach
Goren, Or
author_facet Zucker, Maayan
Kagan, Gregory
Adi, Nimrod
Ronel, Ilai
Matot, Idit
Zac, Lilach
Goren, Or
author_sort Zucker, Maayan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even a small change in the pressure gradient between the venous system and the right atrium can have significant hemodynamic effects. Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) is the driving force of the venous system. As a result, MSFP has a significant effect on cardiac output. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the hemodynamic instability during induction of general anesthesia by intravenous propofol administration is caused by changes in MSFP. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 15 patients undergoing major surgery requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic parameters, including MSFP, were measured before and after propofol administration and following intubation, using venous return curves at a no-flow state induced by a pneumatic tourniquet. RESULTS: A significant decrease in MSFP was observed in all study patients after propofol administration (median (IQR) pressure 17 (9) mmHg compared with 25 (7) before propofol administration, p = 0.001). The pressure gradient for venous return (MSFP – central venous pressure; CVP) also decreased following propofol administration from 19 (8) to 12 (6) mmHg, p = 0.001. Central venous pressure did not change. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that induction of anesthesia with propofol causes a marked reduction in MSFP. A possible mechanism of propofol-induced hypotension is reduction in preload due to a decrease in the venous vasomotor tone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93060942022-07-23 Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol Zucker, Maayan Kagan, Gregory Adi, Nimrod Ronel, Ilai Matot, Idit Zac, Lilach Goren, Or BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Even a small change in the pressure gradient between the venous system and the right atrium can have significant hemodynamic effects. Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) is the driving force of the venous system. As a result, MSFP has a significant effect on cardiac output. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the hemodynamic instability during induction of general anesthesia by intravenous propofol administration is caused by changes in MSFP. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 15 patients undergoing major surgery requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic parameters, including MSFP, were measured before and after propofol administration and following intubation, using venous return curves at a no-flow state induced by a pneumatic tourniquet. RESULTS: A significant decrease in MSFP was observed in all study patients after propofol administration (median (IQR) pressure 17 (9) mmHg compared with 25 (7) before propofol administration, p = 0.001). The pressure gradient for venous return (MSFP – central venous pressure; CVP) also decreased following propofol administration from 19 (8) to 12 (6) mmHg, p = 0.001. Central venous pressure did not change. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that induction of anesthesia with propofol causes a marked reduction in MSFP. A possible mechanism of propofol-induced hypotension is reduction in preload due to a decrease in the venous vasomotor tone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8. BioMed Central 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9306094/ /pubmed/35869445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zucker, Maayan
Kagan, Gregory
Adi, Nimrod
Ronel, Ilai
Matot, Idit
Zac, Lilach
Goren, Or
Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title_full Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title_fullStr Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title_full_unstemmed Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title_short Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
title_sort changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zuckermaayan changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT kagangregory changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT adinimrod changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT ronelilai changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT matotidit changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT zaclilach changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol
AT gorenor changesinmeansystemicfillingpressureasanestimateofhemodynamicresponsetoanesthesiainductionusingpropofol