Cargando…
Prognostic value of platelet count-related ratios on admission in patients with pyogenic liver abscess
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the association between C-reactive protein-to-platelet ratio (CPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR) and fibrinogen-to-platelet ratio (FPR) and the prognoses of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) patients. METHODS: A cohort of 372 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07613-x |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the association between C-reactive protein-to-platelet ratio (CPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR) and fibrinogen-to-platelet ratio (FPR) and the prognoses of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) patients. METHODS: A cohort of 372 patients with confirmed PLA were enrolled in this retrospective study between 2015 and 2021. Laboratory data were collected on admission within 24 h. The demographic characteristics and clinical features were recorded. Risk factors for outcomes of PLA patients were determined via multivariate logistic regression analyses, and optimal cut-off values were estimated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Out of 372 patients, 57.8% were men, 80 (21.5%) developed sepsis, and 33 (8.9%) developed septic shock. The levels of CPR, NLPR and FPR were significantly increased in the development of sepsis, and prolonged hospital stays in PLA patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the CPR (OR: 2.262, 95% CI: 1.586–3.226, p < 0.001), NLPR (OR: 1.118, 95% CI: 1.070–1.167, p < 0.001) and FPR (OR: 1.197, 95% CI: 1.079–1.329, p = 0.001) were independent risks of PLA patients with sepsis, and NLPR (OR: 1.019, 95% CI: 1.004–1.046, p = 0.019) was shown to be an independent predictor of prolonged hospital stays. The ROC curve results showed that the three biomarkers had different predictive values, and CPR proved to work best, with a ROC value of 0.851 (95% CI: 0.807–0.896, p < 0.001) for sepsis. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of CPR, NLPR and FPR were associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes. Moreover, a high CPR level performed best when predicting the clinical outcome in PLA patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07613-x. |
---|