Cargando…

Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study

BACKGROUND: To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerlach, Rene, Toepfer, Andreas, Jacxsens, Matthijs, Zdravkovic, Viliam, Potocnik, Primoz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05646-6
_version_ 1784752488767815680
author Gerlach, Rene
Toepfer, Andreas
Jacxsens, Matthijs
Zdravkovic, Viliam
Potocnik, Primoz
author_facet Gerlach, Rene
Toepfer, Andreas
Jacxsens, Matthijs
Zdravkovic, Viliam
Potocnik, Primoz
author_sort Gerlach, Rene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed. RESULTS: In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.122 and p = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix (p < 0.001). Posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) size predicted LOR with ≥ 22.5% being the threshold for critical PMF-size (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Temporizing cast immobilization was a safe option for those ankle fracture-dislocations in which immediate definite treatment was not possible. Those temporized in a cast underwent definite fixation earlier than those with a fix-ex and had a complication rate no worse than the ex-fix patients. PMF-size was an important predictor for LOR. Primary ex-fix seems appropriate for those with ≥ 22.5% PMF-size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study does not meet the criteria of a prospective, clinical trial. There was no registration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93061702022-07-23 Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study Gerlach, Rene Toepfer, Andreas Jacxsens, Matthijs Zdravkovic, Viliam Potocnik, Primoz BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed. RESULTS: In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.122 and p = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix (p < 0.001). Posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) size predicted LOR with ≥ 22.5% being the threshold for critical PMF-size (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Temporizing cast immobilization was a safe option for those ankle fracture-dislocations in which immediate definite treatment was not possible. Those temporized in a cast underwent definite fixation earlier than those with a fix-ex and had a complication rate no worse than the ex-fix patients. PMF-size was an important predictor for LOR. Primary ex-fix seems appropriate for those with ≥ 22.5% PMF-size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study does not meet the criteria of a prospective, clinical trial. There was no registration. BioMed Central 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9306170/ /pubmed/35869482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05646-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gerlach, Rene
Toepfer, Andreas
Jacxsens, Matthijs
Zdravkovic, Viliam
Potocnik, Primoz
Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title_full Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title_fullStr Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title_short Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
title_sort temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05646-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gerlachrene temporizingcastimmobilizationisasafealternativetoexternalfixationinanklefracturedislocationwhileposteriormalleolarfragmentsizepredictslossofreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT toepferandreas temporizingcastimmobilizationisasafealternativetoexternalfixationinanklefracturedislocationwhileposteriormalleolarfragmentsizepredictslossofreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT jacxsensmatthijs temporizingcastimmobilizationisasafealternativetoexternalfixationinanklefracturedislocationwhileposteriormalleolarfragmentsizepredictslossofreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT zdravkovicviliam temporizingcastimmobilizationisasafealternativetoexternalfixationinanklefracturedislocationwhileposteriormalleolarfragmentsizepredictslossofreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT potocnikprimoz temporizingcastimmobilizationisasafealternativetoexternalfixationinanklefracturedislocationwhileposteriormalleolarfragmentsizepredictslossofreductionacasecontrolstudy