Cargando…

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a shift in healthcare towards telehealth delivery, which presents challenges for exercise physiology services. We aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach, efficacy, adoption and implementation of telehealth delivery for exercis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Patrick J., Keating, Shelley E., Askew, Christopher D., Clanchy, Kelly M., Jansons, Paul, Maddison, Ralph, Maiorana, Andrew, McVicar, Jenna, Robinson, Suzanne, Mundell, Niamh L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2
_version_ 1784752501936881664
author Owen, Patrick J.
Keating, Shelley E.
Askew, Christopher D.
Clanchy, Kelly M.
Jansons, Paul
Maddison, Ralph
Maiorana, Andrew
McVicar, Jenna
Robinson, Suzanne
Mundell, Niamh L.
author_facet Owen, Patrick J.
Keating, Shelley E.
Askew, Christopher D.
Clanchy, Kelly M.
Jansons, Paul
Maddison, Ralph
Maiorana, Andrew
McVicar, Jenna
Robinson, Suzanne
Mundell, Niamh L.
author_sort Owen, Patrick J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a shift in healthcare towards telehealth delivery, which presents challenges for exercise physiology services. We aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach, efficacy, adoption and implementation of telehealth delivery for exercise physiology services by comparing Australian practises before (prior to 25 January 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (after 25 January 2020). METHODS: This retrospective audit included 80 accredited exercise physiology clinicians. We examined relevant dimensions of the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) from the clinician perspective. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, 91% (n = 73/80) of surveyed clinicians offered telehealth delivery service, compared to 25% (n = 20/80) prior. Mean (SD) telehealth delivery per week doubled from 5 (7) to 10 (8) hours. In-person delivery decreased from 23 (11) to 15 (11) hours per week. Typical reasons for not offering telehealth delivery were client physical/cognitive incapacity (n = 33/80, 41%) and safety (n = 24/80, 30%). Clinician-reported reasons for typical clients not adopting telehealth delivery were personal preference (n = 57/71, 80%), physical capacity (n = 35/71, 49%) and access to reliable delivery platforms (n = 27/71, 38%). Zoom (n = 54/71, 76%) and telephone (n = 53/71, 75%) were the most commonly used platforms. Of the reasons contributing to incomplete treatment, lack of confidence in delivery mode was sevenfold higher for telehealth compared to in-person delivery. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth delivery of exercise physiology services increased and in-person delivery decreased, which suggests the profession was adaptable and agile. However, further research determining comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93062372022-07-24 Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit Owen, Patrick J. Keating, Shelley E. Askew, Christopher D. Clanchy, Kelly M. Jansons, Paul Maddison, Ralph Maiorana, Andrew McVicar, Jenna Robinson, Suzanne Mundell, Niamh L. Sports Med Open Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a shift in healthcare towards telehealth delivery, which presents challenges for exercise physiology services. We aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach, efficacy, adoption and implementation of telehealth delivery for exercise physiology services by comparing Australian practises before (prior to 25 January 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (after 25 January 2020). METHODS: This retrospective audit included 80 accredited exercise physiology clinicians. We examined relevant dimensions of the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) from the clinician perspective. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, 91% (n = 73/80) of surveyed clinicians offered telehealth delivery service, compared to 25% (n = 20/80) prior. Mean (SD) telehealth delivery per week doubled from 5 (7) to 10 (8) hours. In-person delivery decreased from 23 (11) to 15 (11) hours per week. Typical reasons for not offering telehealth delivery were client physical/cognitive incapacity (n = 33/80, 41%) and safety (n = 24/80, 30%). Clinician-reported reasons for typical clients not adopting telehealth delivery were personal preference (n = 57/71, 80%), physical capacity (n = 35/71, 49%) and access to reliable delivery platforms (n = 27/71, 38%). Zoom (n = 54/71, 76%) and telephone (n = 53/71, 75%) were the most commonly used platforms. Of the reasons contributing to incomplete treatment, lack of confidence in delivery mode was sevenfold higher for telehealth compared to in-person delivery. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth delivery of exercise physiology services increased and in-person delivery decreased, which suggests the profession was adaptable and agile. However, further research determining comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9306237/ /pubmed/35867168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Owen, Patrick J.
Keating, Shelley E.
Askew, Christopher D.
Clanchy, Kelly M.
Jansons, Paul
Maddison, Ralph
Maiorana, Andrew
McVicar, Jenna
Robinson, Suzanne
Mundell, Niamh L.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title_full Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title_fullStr Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title_short Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit
title_sort impact of the covid-19 pandemic on exercise physiology services in australia: a retrospective audit
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2
work_keys_str_mv AT owenpatrickj impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT keatingshelleye impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT askewchristopherd impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT clanchykellym impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT jansonspaul impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT maddisonralph impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT maioranaandrew impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT mcvicarjenna impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT robinsonsuzanne impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit
AT mundellniamhl impactofthecovid19pandemiconexercisephysiologyservicesinaustraliaaretrospectiveaudit