Cargando…

How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care

BACKGROUND: Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyon, Aaron R., Liu, Freda F., Connors, Elizabeth H., King, Kevin M., Coifman, Jessica I., Cook, Heather, McRee, Erin, Ludwig, Kristy, Law, Amy, Dorsey, Shannon, McCauley, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y
_version_ 1784752504169299968
author Lyon, Aaron R.
Liu, Freda F.
Connors, Elizabeth H.
King, Kevin M.
Coifman, Jessica I.
Cook, Heather
McRee, Erin
Ludwig, Kristy
Law, Amy
Dorsey, Shannon
McCauley, Elizabeth
author_facet Lyon, Aaron R.
Liu, Freda F.
Connors, Elizabeth H.
King, Kevin M.
Coifman, Jessica I.
Cook, Heather
McRee, Erin
Ludwig, Kristy
Law, Amy
Dorsey, Shannon
McCauley, Elizabeth
author_sort Lyon, Aaron R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosages of consultation necessary to produce desired outcomes. Moreover, the degree to which training and consultation engage theoretical implementation mechanisms—such as provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes—is not well understood. This study examined the effects of a brief online training and varying dosages of post-training consultation (BOLT+PTC) on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care (MBC) practices delivered in the context of education sector mental health services. METHODS: A national sample of 75 clinicians who provide mental health interventions to children and adolescents in schools were randomly assigned to BOLT+PTC or control (services as usual). Those in BOLT+PTC were further randomized to 2-, 4-, or 8-week consultation conditions. Self-reported MBC knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use (including standardized assessment, individualized assessment, and assessment-informed treatment modification) were collected for 32 weeks. Multilevel models were used to examine main effects of BOLT+PTC versus control on MBC use at the end of consultation and over time, as well as comparisons among PTC dosage conditions and theorized mechanisms (skills, attitudes, knowledge). RESULTS: There was a significant linear effect of BOLT+PTC over time on standardized assessment use (b = .02, p < .01), and a significant quadratic effect of BOLT+PTC over time on individualized assessment use (b = .04, p < .001), but no significant effect on treatment modification. BOLT + any level of PTC resulted in higher MBC knowledge and larger growth in MBC skill over the intervention period as compared to control. PTC dosage levels were inconsistently predictive of outcomes, providing no clear evidence for added benefit of higher PTC dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Online training and consultation in MBC had effects on standardized and individualized assessment use among clinicians as compared to services as usual with no consistent benefit detected for increased consultation dosage. Continued research investigating optimal dosages and mechanisms of these established implementation strategies is needed to ensure training and consultation resources are deployed efficiently to impact clinician practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041517. Retrospectively registered on 10 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93062462022-07-24 How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care Lyon, Aaron R. Liu, Freda F. Connors, Elizabeth H. King, Kevin M. Coifman, Jessica I. Cook, Heather McRee, Erin Ludwig, Kristy Law, Amy Dorsey, Shannon McCauley, Elizabeth Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosages of consultation necessary to produce desired outcomes. Moreover, the degree to which training and consultation engage theoretical implementation mechanisms—such as provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes—is not well understood. This study examined the effects of a brief online training and varying dosages of post-training consultation (BOLT+PTC) on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care (MBC) practices delivered in the context of education sector mental health services. METHODS: A national sample of 75 clinicians who provide mental health interventions to children and adolescents in schools were randomly assigned to BOLT+PTC or control (services as usual). Those in BOLT+PTC were further randomized to 2-, 4-, or 8-week consultation conditions. Self-reported MBC knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use (including standardized assessment, individualized assessment, and assessment-informed treatment modification) were collected for 32 weeks. Multilevel models were used to examine main effects of BOLT+PTC versus control on MBC use at the end of consultation and over time, as well as comparisons among PTC dosage conditions and theorized mechanisms (skills, attitudes, knowledge). RESULTS: There was a significant linear effect of BOLT+PTC over time on standardized assessment use (b = .02, p < .01), and a significant quadratic effect of BOLT+PTC over time on individualized assessment use (b = .04, p < .001), but no significant effect on treatment modification. BOLT + any level of PTC resulted in higher MBC knowledge and larger growth in MBC skill over the intervention period as compared to control. PTC dosage levels were inconsistently predictive of outcomes, providing no clear evidence for added benefit of higher PTC dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Online training and consultation in MBC had effects on standardized and individualized assessment use among clinicians as compared to services as usual with no consistent benefit detected for increased consultation dosage. Continued research investigating optimal dosages and mechanisms of these established implementation strategies is needed to ensure training and consultation resources are deployed efficiently to impact clinician practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041517. Retrospectively registered on 10 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9306246/ /pubmed/35869500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lyon, Aaron R.
Liu, Freda F.
Connors, Elizabeth H.
King, Kevin M.
Coifman, Jessica I.
Cook, Heather
McRee, Erin
Ludwig, Kristy
Law, Amy
Dorsey, Shannon
McCauley, Elizabeth
How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title_full How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title_fullStr How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title_full_unstemmed How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title_short How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
title_sort how low can you go? examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lyonaaronr howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT liufredaf howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT connorselizabethh howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT kingkevinm howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT coifmanjessicai howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT cookheather howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT mcreeerin howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT ludwigkristy howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT lawamy howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT dorseyshannon howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare
AT mccauleyelizabeth howlowcanyougoexaminingtheeffectsofbriefonlinetrainingandposttrainingconsultationdoseonimplementationmechanismsandoutcomesformeasurementbasedcare