Cargando…
NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the latera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7 |
_version_ | 1784752504409423872 |
---|---|
author | Dinneen, Eoin Grierson, Jack Almeida-Magana, Ricardo Clow, Rosie Haider, Aiman Allen, Clare Heffernan-Ho, Daniel Freeman, Alex Briggs, Tim Nathan, Senthil Mallett, Susan Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Williams, Norman R. Pizzo, Elena Persad, Raj Aning, Jon Johnson, Lyndsey Oxley, Jon Oakley, Neil Morgan, Susan Tahir, Fawzia Ahmad, Imran Dutto, Lorenzo Salmond, Jonathan M. Kelkar, Anand Kelly, John Shaw, Greg |
author_facet | Dinneen, Eoin Grierson, Jack Almeida-Magana, Ricardo Clow, Rosie Haider, Aiman Allen, Clare Heffernan-Ho, Daniel Freeman, Alex Briggs, Tim Nathan, Senthil Mallett, Susan Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Williams, Norman R. Pizzo, Elena Persad, Raj Aning, Jon Johnson, Lyndsey Oxley, Jon Oakley, Neil Morgan, Susan Tahir, Fawzia Ahmad, Imran Dutto, Lorenzo Salmond, Jonathan M. Kelkar, Anand Kelly, John Shaw, Greg |
author_sort | Dinneen, Eoin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM. METHODS: NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life. DISCUSSION: NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9306247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93062472022-07-24 NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer Dinneen, Eoin Grierson, Jack Almeida-Magana, Ricardo Clow, Rosie Haider, Aiman Allen, Clare Heffernan-Ho, Daniel Freeman, Alex Briggs, Tim Nathan, Senthil Mallett, Susan Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Williams, Norman R. Pizzo, Elena Persad, Raj Aning, Jon Johnson, Lyndsey Oxley, Jon Oakley, Neil Morgan, Susan Tahir, Fawzia Ahmad, Imran Dutto, Lorenzo Salmond, Jonathan M. Kelkar, Anand Kelly, John Shaw, Greg Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM. METHODS: NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life. DISCUSSION: NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9306247/ /pubmed/35869497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dinneen, Eoin Grierson, Jack Almeida-Magana, Ricardo Clow, Rosie Haider, Aiman Allen, Clare Heffernan-Ho, Daniel Freeman, Alex Briggs, Tim Nathan, Senthil Mallett, Susan Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Williams, Norman R. Pizzo, Elena Persad, Raj Aning, Jon Johnson, Lyndsey Oxley, Jon Oakley, Neil Morgan, Susan Tahir, Fawzia Ahmad, Imran Dutto, Lorenzo Salmond, Jonathan M. Kelkar, Anand Kelly, John Shaw, Greg NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title | NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title_full | NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title_short | NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
title_sort | neurosafe proof: study protocol for a single-blinded, ideal stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of neurosafe robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinneeneoin neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT griersonjack neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT almeidamaganaricardo neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT clowrosie neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT haideraiman neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT allenclare neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT heffernanhodaniel neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT freemanalex neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT briggstim neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT nathansenthil neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT mallettsusan neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT brewgraveschris neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT muirheadnicola neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT williamsnormanr neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT pizzoelena neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT persadraj neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT aningjon neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT johnsonlyndsey neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT oxleyjon neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT oakleyneil neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT morgansusan neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT tahirfawzia neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT ahmadimran neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT duttolorenzo neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT salmondjonathanm neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT kelkaranand neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT kellyjohn neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer AT shawgreg neurosafeproofstudyprotocolforasingleblindedidealstage3multicentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialofneurosaferoboticassistedradicalprostatectomyversusstandardroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyinmenwithlocalizedprostatecancer |