Cargando…
Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic surgery has been widely used in clinical practice for more than 30 years due to its advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, and direct vision. The aim of this study was to compare hysteroscopic morcellation versus conventional resectoscopy for removal of endometrial lesio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844074 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.936771 |
_version_ | 1784752514012282880 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Fangying Huang, Guannan Wang, Xue Li, Xuehui Cai, Jianning |
author_facet | Ren, Fangying Huang, Guannan Wang, Xue Li, Xuehui Cai, Jianning |
author_sort | Ren, Fangying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic surgery has been widely used in clinical practice for more than 30 years due to its advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, and direct vision. The aim of this study was to compare hysteroscopic morcellation versus conventional resectoscopy for removal of endometrial lesions. MATERIAL/METHODS: For the database search, we used the keywords “morcellator,” “morcellators,” “morcellate,” “morcellation,” and “morcellated” combined with “hysteroscopy,” “uteroscope,” and “transcervical”. The last search was conducted on February 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: According to our retrieval scheme and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found 6 studies including 565 patients. For enumeration data, we calculated the effect size as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), while for quantitative data we used the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). There was no significant difference between success rate of hysteroscopic morcellation and conventional resectoscopy (relative risk and 95% confidence interval 1.05(0.97,1.13); P=0.232). Procedure time was also shorter with hysteroscopic morcellation, the procedure time of the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 3.43 min shorter compared with the conventional resectoscopy group, and the operating time in the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 2.81 min shorter. In terms of fluid deficit, there was no statistically significant difference in fluid loss between the 2 groups (P=0.209). CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic morcellation is associated with a shorter procedure time and operative time among patients with endometrial lesions compared with resectoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9306303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93063032022-08-01 Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis Ren, Fangying Huang, Guannan Wang, Xue Li, Xuehui Cai, Jianning Med Sci Monit Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic surgery has been widely used in clinical practice for more than 30 years due to its advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, and direct vision. The aim of this study was to compare hysteroscopic morcellation versus conventional resectoscopy for removal of endometrial lesions. MATERIAL/METHODS: For the database search, we used the keywords “morcellator,” “morcellators,” “morcellate,” “morcellation,” and “morcellated” combined with “hysteroscopy,” “uteroscope,” and “transcervical”. The last search was conducted on February 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: According to our retrieval scheme and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found 6 studies including 565 patients. For enumeration data, we calculated the effect size as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), while for quantitative data we used the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). There was no significant difference between success rate of hysteroscopic morcellation and conventional resectoscopy (relative risk and 95% confidence interval 1.05(0.97,1.13); P=0.232). Procedure time was also shorter with hysteroscopic morcellation, the procedure time of the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 3.43 min shorter compared with the conventional resectoscopy group, and the operating time in the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 2.81 min shorter. In terms of fluid deficit, there was no statistically significant difference in fluid loss between the 2 groups (P=0.209). CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic morcellation is associated with a shorter procedure time and operative time among patients with endometrial lesions compared with resectoscopy. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9306303/ /pubmed/35844074 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.936771 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Ren, Fangying Huang, Guannan Wang, Xue Li, Xuehui Cai, Jianning Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of hysteroscopic morcellation versus resectoscopy in treatment of patients with endometrial lesions: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844074 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.936771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renfangying comparisonofhysteroscopicmorcellationversusresectoscopyintreatmentofpatientswithendometriallesionsametaanalysis AT huangguannan comparisonofhysteroscopicmorcellationversusresectoscopyintreatmentofpatientswithendometriallesionsametaanalysis AT wangxue comparisonofhysteroscopicmorcellationversusresectoscopyintreatmentofpatientswithendometriallesionsametaanalysis AT lixuehui comparisonofhysteroscopicmorcellationversusresectoscopyintreatmentofpatientswithendometriallesionsametaanalysis AT caijianning comparisonofhysteroscopicmorcellationversusresectoscopyintreatmentofpatientswithendometriallesionsametaanalysis |