Cargando…

Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate histomorphometric outcomes of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation in different areas of the same cavity and to correlate results to bucco‐palatal sinus width (SW) and residual bone height (RBH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients needing maxillary sinus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stacchi, Claudio, Rapani, Antonio, Lombardi, Teresa, Bernardello, Fabio, Nicolin, Vanessa, Berton, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34978096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13891
_version_ 1784752543679643648
author Stacchi, Claudio
Rapani, Antonio
Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Nicolin, Vanessa
Berton, Federico
author_facet Stacchi, Claudio
Rapani, Antonio
Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Nicolin, Vanessa
Berton, Federico
author_sort Stacchi, Claudio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate histomorphometric outcomes of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation in different areas of the same cavity and to correlate results to bucco‐palatal sinus width (SW) and residual bone height (RBH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients needing maxillary sinus floor elevation (RBH <5 mm) to insert two nonadjacent implants were treated with lateral augmentation using a composite graft. Six months later, two bone‐core biopsies (mesial/distal) were retrieved in implant insertion sites. SW and RBH were measured on cone beam computed tomography, and correlations between histomorphometric and anatomical parameters were evaluated by multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent sinus augmentation, and eighteen were included in the final analysis (two dropouts for membrane perforation). Mean newly formed mineralized tissue percentage (%NFMT) after 6 months in mesial and distal sites was 17.5 ± 4.7 and 11.6 ± 4.7, respectively (p = .0004). Multivariate linear regression showed a strong negative correlation between SW and %NFMT (β coefficient=−.774, p < .0001) and no correlation between RBH and %NFMT (β coefficient =−.038, p = .825). CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that %NFMT after lateral sinus augmentation occurs at different rates in different anatomical areas of the same maxillary sinus, showing a strong negative correlation with SW, whereas no influence of RBH was observed. Clinicians should regard SW as a guide for graft selection and to decide duration of the healing period. Researchers should consider SW as a predictor variable, when comparing regenerative outcomes of different biomaterials by using maxillary sinus as an experimental model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93064662022-07-28 Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study Stacchi, Claudio Rapani, Antonio Lombardi, Teresa Bernardello, Fabio Nicolin, Vanessa Berton, Federico Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate histomorphometric outcomes of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation in different areas of the same cavity and to correlate results to bucco‐palatal sinus width (SW) and residual bone height (RBH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients needing maxillary sinus floor elevation (RBH <5 mm) to insert two nonadjacent implants were treated with lateral augmentation using a composite graft. Six months later, two bone‐core biopsies (mesial/distal) were retrieved in implant insertion sites. SW and RBH were measured on cone beam computed tomography, and correlations between histomorphometric and anatomical parameters were evaluated by multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent sinus augmentation, and eighteen were included in the final analysis (two dropouts for membrane perforation). Mean newly formed mineralized tissue percentage (%NFMT) after 6 months in mesial and distal sites was 17.5 ± 4.7 and 11.6 ± 4.7, respectively (p = .0004). Multivariate linear regression showed a strong negative correlation between SW and %NFMT (β coefficient=−.774, p < .0001) and no correlation between RBH and %NFMT (β coefficient =−.038, p = .825). CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that %NFMT after lateral sinus augmentation occurs at different rates in different anatomical areas of the same maxillary sinus, showing a strong negative correlation with SW, whereas no influence of RBH was observed. Clinicians should regard SW as a guide for graft selection and to decide duration of the healing period. Researchers should consider SW as a predictor variable, when comparing regenerative outcomes of different biomaterials by using maxillary sinus as an experimental model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-12 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9306466/ /pubmed/34978096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13891 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stacchi, Claudio
Rapani, Antonio
Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Nicolin, Vanessa
Berton, Federico
Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title_full Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title_fullStr Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title_full_unstemmed Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title_short Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
title_sort does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? a prospective histomorphometric study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34978096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13891
work_keys_str_mv AT stacchiclaudio doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy
AT rapaniantonio doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy
AT lombarditeresa doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy
AT bernardellofabio doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy
AT nicolinvanessa doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy
AT bertonfederico doesnewboneformationvaryindifferentsiteswithinthesamemaxillarysinusafterlateralaugmentationaprospectivehistomorphometricstudy