Cargando…

Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madvig, Fie, Pedersen, Marc Künkel, Urhoj, Stine Kjær, Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik, Jørgensen, Niels, Priskorn, Lærke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161
_version_ 1784752584457715712
author Madvig, Fie
Pedersen, Marc Künkel
Urhoj, Stine Kjær
Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik
Jørgensen, Niels
Priskorn, Lærke
author_facet Madvig, Fie
Pedersen, Marc Künkel
Urhoj, Stine Kjær
Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik
Jørgensen, Niels
Priskorn, Lærke
author_sort Madvig, Fie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between AGD and male factor infertility and among proven fertile men also time to pregnancy (TTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All included men were recruited from and examined at Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Denmark (N = 388). Men with impaired semen quality were included from infertile couples (N = 128), and men with naturally conceived pregnant partners were invited to participate when their partners had their routine second trimester examination (N = 260). All men underwent a physical examination, completed a questionnaire (including TTP for the fertile men), delivered a semen sample and had a blood sample drawn. The primary exposure was AGD(AS) measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum. Associations between AGD and fertility status as well as between AGD and TTP among the fertile men were calculated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: AGD did not show a statistically significant association with fertility status. In adjusted logistic regression models, the odds of infertility per 1 cm increase in AGD(AS) were 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88; 1.19). Among fertile men, a 1‐cm increase in AGD(AS) was associated with an 8% non‐statistically significantly reduced odds of having a longer (>3months) TTP (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the clinical application of AGD as a predictor of fertility and fecundity seems to be limited as no associations were observed between AGD and fertility status, nor was the decreased risk of experiencing a longer TTP with longer AGD(AS) statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93066352022-07-28 Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy Madvig, Fie Pedersen, Marc Künkel Urhoj, Stine Kjær Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik Jørgensen, Niels Priskorn, Lærke Andrology Original Articles BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between AGD and male factor infertility and among proven fertile men also time to pregnancy (TTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All included men were recruited from and examined at Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Denmark (N = 388). Men with impaired semen quality were included from infertile couples (N = 128), and men with naturally conceived pregnant partners were invited to participate when their partners had their routine second trimester examination (N = 260). All men underwent a physical examination, completed a questionnaire (including TTP for the fertile men), delivered a semen sample and had a blood sample drawn. The primary exposure was AGD(AS) measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum. Associations between AGD and fertility status as well as between AGD and TTP among the fertile men were calculated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: AGD did not show a statistically significant association with fertility status. In adjusted logistic regression models, the odds of infertility per 1 cm increase in AGD(AS) were 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88; 1.19). Among fertile men, a 1‐cm increase in AGD(AS) was associated with an 8% non‐statistically significantly reduced odds of having a longer (>3months) TTP (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the clinical application of AGD as a predictor of fertility and fecundity seems to be limited as no associations were observed between AGD and fertility status, nor was the decreased risk of experiencing a longer TTP with longer AGD(AS) statistically significant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-26 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9306635/ /pubmed/35178873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161 Text en © 2022 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Madvig, Fie
Pedersen, Marc Künkel
Urhoj, Stine Kjær
Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik
Jørgensen, Niels
Priskorn, Lærke
Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title_full Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title_fullStr Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title_short Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
title_sort anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT madvigfie anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy
AT pedersenmarckunkel anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy
AT urhojstinekjær anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy
AT braunerelviravaclavik anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy
AT jørgensenniels anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy
AT priskornlærke anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy