Cargando…
Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161 |
_version_ | 1784752584457715712 |
---|---|
author | Madvig, Fie Pedersen, Marc Künkel Urhoj, Stine Kjær Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik Jørgensen, Niels Priskorn, Lærke |
author_facet | Madvig, Fie Pedersen, Marc Künkel Urhoj, Stine Kjær Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik Jørgensen, Niels Priskorn, Lærke |
author_sort | Madvig, Fie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between AGD and male factor infertility and among proven fertile men also time to pregnancy (TTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All included men were recruited from and examined at Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Denmark (N = 388). Men with impaired semen quality were included from infertile couples (N = 128), and men with naturally conceived pregnant partners were invited to participate when their partners had their routine second trimester examination (N = 260). All men underwent a physical examination, completed a questionnaire (including TTP for the fertile men), delivered a semen sample and had a blood sample drawn. The primary exposure was AGD(AS) measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum. Associations between AGD and fertility status as well as between AGD and TTP among the fertile men were calculated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: AGD did not show a statistically significant association with fertility status. In adjusted logistic regression models, the odds of infertility per 1 cm increase in AGD(AS) were 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88; 1.19). Among fertile men, a 1‐cm increase in AGD(AS) was associated with an 8% non‐statistically significantly reduced odds of having a longer (>3months) TTP (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the clinical application of AGD as a predictor of fertility and fecundity seems to be limited as no associations were observed between AGD and fertility status, nor was the decreased risk of experiencing a longer TTP with longer AGD(AS) statistically significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9306635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93066352022-07-28 Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy Madvig, Fie Pedersen, Marc Künkel Urhoj, Stine Kjær Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik Jørgensen, Niels Priskorn, Lærke Andrology Original Articles BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD), the distance between the anus and genitals, is in rodents a well‐established marker of early androgen action and has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Thus, a link between human AGD and semen quality and potentially fecundity may exist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between AGD and male factor infertility and among proven fertile men also time to pregnancy (TTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All included men were recruited from and examined at Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Denmark (N = 388). Men with impaired semen quality were included from infertile couples (N = 128), and men with naturally conceived pregnant partners were invited to participate when their partners had their routine second trimester examination (N = 260). All men underwent a physical examination, completed a questionnaire (including TTP for the fertile men), delivered a semen sample and had a blood sample drawn. The primary exposure was AGD(AS) measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum. Associations between AGD and fertility status as well as between AGD and TTP among the fertile men were calculated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: AGD did not show a statistically significant association with fertility status. In adjusted logistic regression models, the odds of infertility per 1 cm increase in AGD(AS) were 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88; 1.19). Among fertile men, a 1‐cm increase in AGD(AS) was associated with an 8% non‐statistically significantly reduced odds of having a longer (>3months) TTP (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the clinical application of AGD as a predictor of fertility and fecundity seems to be limited as no associations were observed between AGD and fertility status, nor was the decreased risk of experiencing a longer TTP with longer AGD(AS) statistically significant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-26 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9306635/ /pubmed/35178873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161 Text en © 2022 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Madvig, Fie Pedersen, Marc Künkel Urhoj, Stine Kjær Bräuner, Elvira Vaclavik Jørgensen, Niels Priskorn, Lærke Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title | Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title_full | Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title_short | Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
title_sort | anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madvigfie anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy AT pedersenmarckunkel anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy AT urhojstinekjær anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy AT braunerelviravaclavik anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy AT jørgensenniels anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy AT priskornlærke anogenitaldistancemalefactorinfertilityandtimetopregnancy |