Commissioning of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for moving targets at the Osaka Heavy‐Ion Therapy Center

PURPOSE: Herein, we report the methods and results of the Hitachi carbon‐ion therapy facility commissioning to determine the optimum values of the magnitude of movement and repaint number in respiratory‐gated irradiation. METHODS: A virtual‐cylinder target was created using the treatment‐planning system (VQA Plan), and measurements were performed to study the effects of respiratory movements using a two‐dimensional ionization‐chamber array detector and a phantom with movable wedge and stage. For simulations, we selected a 10 × 10 × 10 cm(3) cubic irradiation pattern with a uniform physical dose and two actual cases of liver‐cancer treatments, whose prescribed doses were 60 Gy(RBE)/4 fraction (Case 1) and 60 Gy(RBE)/12 fraction (Case 2). We employed two types of repainting methods, one produced by the algorithm of VQA Plan (VQA algorithm) and the other by ideal repainting. The latter completely repeats all spots with set number of repaintings. We performed flatness calculations and gamma analysis to evaluate the effects of each condition. RESULTS: From the measurements, the gamma passing rates for which the criteria were 3%/3 mm exceeded 95% for displacements in the head‐to‐tail direction if the repaint number was greater than 3 and the magnitude of the residual motions was less than 5.0 mm. In simulations with the cubic irradiation pattern, the gamma passing rates (with criteria of 2%/2 mm) exceeded 95% when the magnitude of the residual motions was 3.0 mm and the repaint number was greater than 3. When the repaint number was set to 4 in the VQA with the actual liver cases, the flatness results for Case 2 was minimal. For ideal repainting, the flatness results for all ports fell within ∼3.0% even when the magnitude of the residual motions was 5.0 mm if the repaint number was 6. However, the flatness was less than 3.0% for almost all ports if the magnitude of the residual motions was less than 3.0 mm with a repaint number of 4 in case of both types of repaint methods. CONCLUSIONS: At our facility, carbon‐ion radiotherapy can be provided safely to a moving target with residual motions of 3.0 mm magnitude and with a repaint number of 4.