Cargando…

Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study

BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staas, Tristan Ariaan, Groenendijk, Edith, Bronkhorst, Ewald, Verhamme, Luc, Raghoebar, Gerry Max, Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060
_version_ 1784752633407340544
author Staas, Tristan Ariaan
Groenendijk, Edith
Bronkhorst, Ewald
Verhamme, Luc
Raghoebar, Gerry Max
Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus
author_facet Staas, Tristan Ariaan
Groenendijk, Edith
Bronkhorst, Ewald
Verhamme, Luc
Raghoebar, Gerry Max
Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus
author_sort Staas, Tristan Ariaan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess the BCT and buccal crest height (BCH) after 1 year and to calculate the correlation between initial and final achieved BCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective study on FIIPP. Only patients were included in whom one maxillary incisor was considered as lost. In six centers, 100 consecutive patients received FIIPP. Implants were placed in a maximal palatal position of the socket, thereby creating a buccal space of at least 2 mm, which was subsequently filled with a bovine bone substitute. Files of preoperative (T0), peroperative (T1) and 1‐year postoperative (T3) cone beam computed tomogram (CBCT) scans were imported into the Maxillim™ software to analyze the changes in BCT‐BCH over time. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 85% of the cases showed a BCT ≤1 mm, in 25% of the patients also a small buccal defect (≤5 mm) was present. Mean BCT at the level of the implant‐shoulder increased from 0.6 mm at baseline to 3.3 mm immediate postoperatively and compacted to 2.4 mm after 1 year. Mean BCH improved from 0.7 to 3.1 mm peroperatively, and resorbed to 1.7 mm after 1 year. The Pearson correlation of 0.38 between initial and final BCT was significant (p = 0.01) and therefore is valued as moderate. If only patients (75%) with an intact alveolus were included in the analysis, still a “moderate correlation” of 0.32 (p = 0.01) was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: A “moderate correlation” was shown for the hypothesis that “thinner preoperative BCT's deliver thinner BCT's” 1 year after performing FIIPP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93068512022-07-28 Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study Staas, Tristan Ariaan Groenendijk, Edith Bronkhorst, Ewald Verhamme, Luc Raghoebar, Gerry Max Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess the BCT and buccal crest height (BCH) after 1 year and to calculate the correlation between initial and final achieved BCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective study on FIIPP. Only patients were included in whom one maxillary incisor was considered as lost. In six centers, 100 consecutive patients received FIIPP. Implants were placed in a maximal palatal position of the socket, thereby creating a buccal space of at least 2 mm, which was subsequently filled with a bovine bone substitute. Files of preoperative (T0), peroperative (T1) and 1‐year postoperative (T3) cone beam computed tomogram (CBCT) scans were imported into the Maxillim™ software to analyze the changes in BCT‐BCH over time. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 85% of the cases showed a BCT ≤1 mm, in 25% of the patients also a small buccal defect (≤5 mm) was present. Mean BCT at the level of the implant‐shoulder increased from 0.6 mm at baseline to 3.3 mm immediate postoperatively and compacted to 2.4 mm after 1 year. Mean BCH improved from 0.7 to 3.1 mm peroperatively, and resorbed to 1.7 mm after 1 year. The Pearson correlation of 0.38 between initial and final BCT was significant (p = 0.01) and therefore is valued as moderate. If only patients (75%) with an intact alveolus were included in the analysis, still a “moderate correlation” of 0.32 (p = 0.01) was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: A “moderate correlation” was shown for the hypothesis that “thinner preoperative BCT's deliver thinner BCT's” 1 year after performing FIIPP. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-01-03 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9306851/ /pubmed/34981616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Staas, Tristan Ariaan
Groenendijk, Edith
Bronkhorst, Ewald
Verhamme, Luc
Raghoebar, Gerry Max
Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus
Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title_full Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title_fullStr Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title_short Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
title_sort does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: a prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060
work_keys_str_mv AT staastristanariaan doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy
AT groenendijkedith doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy
AT bronkhorstewald doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy
AT verhammeluc doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy
AT raghoebargerrymax doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy
AT meijergerritjacobus doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy