Cargando…
Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study
BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060 |
_version_ | 1784752633407340544 |
---|---|
author | Staas, Tristan Ariaan Groenendijk, Edith Bronkhorst, Ewald Verhamme, Luc Raghoebar, Gerry Max Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus |
author_facet | Staas, Tristan Ariaan Groenendijk, Edith Bronkhorst, Ewald Verhamme, Luc Raghoebar, Gerry Max Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus |
author_sort | Staas, Tristan Ariaan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess the BCT and buccal crest height (BCH) after 1 year and to calculate the correlation between initial and final achieved BCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective study on FIIPP. Only patients were included in whom one maxillary incisor was considered as lost. In six centers, 100 consecutive patients received FIIPP. Implants were placed in a maximal palatal position of the socket, thereby creating a buccal space of at least 2 mm, which was subsequently filled with a bovine bone substitute. Files of preoperative (T0), peroperative (T1) and 1‐year postoperative (T3) cone beam computed tomogram (CBCT) scans were imported into the Maxillim™ software to analyze the changes in BCT‐BCH over time. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 85% of the cases showed a BCT ≤1 mm, in 25% of the patients also a small buccal defect (≤5 mm) was present. Mean BCT at the level of the implant‐shoulder increased from 0.6 mm at baseline to 3.3 mm immediate postoperatively and compacted to 2.4 mm after 1 year. Mean BCH improved from 0.7 to 3.1 mm peroperatively, and resorbed to 1.7 mm after 1 year. The Pearson correlation of 0.38 between initial and final BCT was significant (p = 0.01) and therefore is valued as moderate. If only patients (75%) with an intact alveolus were included in the analysis, still a “moderate correlation” of 0.32 (p = 0.01) was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: A “moderate correlation” was shown for the hypothesis that “thinner preoperative BCT's deliver thinner BCT's” 1 year after performing FIIPP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9306851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93068512022-07-28 Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study Staas, Tristan Ariaan Groenendijk, Edith Bronkhorst, Ewald Verhamme, Luc Raghoebar, Gerry Max Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) in the aesthetic zone is still controversial. Especially, an initial buccal crest thickness (BCT) of ≤1 mm is thought to be disruptive for the final buccal crest stability jeopardizing the aesthetic outcome. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess the BCT and buccal crest height (BCH) after 1 year and to calculate the correlation between initial and final achieved BCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective study on FIIPP. Only patients were included in whom one maxillary incisor was considered as lost. In six centers, 100 consecutive patients received FIIPP. Implants were placed in a maximal palatal position of the socket, thereby creating a buccal space of at least 2 mm, which was subsequently filled with a bovine bone substitute. Files of preoperative (T0), peroperative (T1) and 1‐year postoperative (T3) cone beam computed tomogram (CBCT) scans were imported into the Maxillim™ software to analyze the changes in BCT‐BCH over time. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 85% of the cases showed a BCT ≤1 mm, in 25% of the patients also a small buccal defect (≤5 mm) was present. Mean BCT at the level of the implant‐shoulder increased from 0.6 mm at baseline to 3.3 mm immediate postoperatively and compacted to 2.4 mm after 1 year. Mean BCH improved from 0.7 to 3.1 mm peroperatively, and resorbed to 1.7 mm after 1 year. The Pearson correlation of 0.38 between initial and final BCT was significant (p = 0.01) and therefore is valued as moderate. If only patients (75%) with an intact alveolus were included in the analysis, still a “moderate correlation” of 0.32 (p = 0.01) was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: A “moderate correlation” was shown for the hypothesis that “thinner preoperative BCT's deliver thinner BCT's” 1 year after performing FIIPP. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-01-03 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9306851/ /pubmed/34981616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Staas, Tristan Ariaan Groenendijk, Edith Bronkhorst, Ewald Verhamme, Luc Raghoebar, Gerry Max Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title | Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title_full | Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title_fullStr | Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title_short | Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
title_sort | does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: a prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staastristanariaan doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy AT groenendijkedith doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy AT bronkhorstewald doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy AT verhammeluc doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy AT raghoebargerrymax doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy AT meijergerritjacobus doesinitialbuccalcrestthicknessaffectfinalbuccalcrestthicknessafterflaplessimmediateimplantplacementandprovisionalizationaprospectiveconebeamcomputedtomogramcohortstudy |