Cargando…
Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review
AIMS: The focus of health system interventions for noncommunicable diseases and diabetes focus mainly on primary health care responses. However, existing interventions are not necessarily adapted for the complex management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). We aimed to identify and describe health system in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14805 |
_version_ | 1784752659458162688 |
---|---|
author | Zafra‐Tanaka, Jessica H. Beran, David Bernabe‐Ortiz, Antonio |
author_facet | Zafra‐Tanaka, Jessica H. Beran, David Bernabe‐Ortiz, Antonio |
author_sort | Zafra‐Tanaka, Jessica H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The focus of health system interventions for noncommunicable diseases and diabetes focus mainly on primary health care responses. However, existing interventions are not necessarily adapted for the complex management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). We aimed to identify and describe health system interventions which have been developed to improve the management of T1DM globally. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health using OVID for peer‐review articles published in either English, Spanish, Portuguese or French in the last 10 years. We classified the intervention strategies according to the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy for health system interventions and the World Health Organization (WHO) health system building blocks. RESULTS: This review identified 159 health system interventions to improve T1DM management. Over half of the studies focused only on children or adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Only a small fraction of the studies were conducted in low‐and‐middle income countries (LMICs). According to the EPOC taxonomy, the most frequently studied category was delivery arrangement interventions, while implementation strategies and financial arrangements were less frequently studied. Also, governance arrangements domains were not studied. The most common combination of intervention strategies included self‐management with either telemedicine, use of information and smart home technologies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to expand potential interventions to other EPOC strategies to assess their potential effect on health outcomes in people with T1DM, as well as to involve more LMIC settings as the impact may be greater in these settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9306957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93069572022-07-28 Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review Zafra‐Tanaka, Jessica H. Beran, David Bernabe‐Ortiz, Antonio Diabet Med Reviews AIMS: The focus of health system interventions for noncommunicable diseases and diabetes focus mainly on primary health care responses. However, existing interventions are not necessarily adapted for the complex management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). We aimed to identify and describe health system interventions which have been developed to improve the management of T1DM globally. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health using OVID for peer‐review articles published in either English, Spanish, Portuguese or French in the last 10 years. We classified the intervention strategies according to the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy for health system interventions and the World Health Organization (WHO) health system building blocks. RESULTS: This review identified 159 health system interventions to improve T1DM management. Over half of the studies focused only on children or adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Only a small fraction of the studies were conducted in low‐and‐middle income countries (LMICs). According to the EPOC taxonomy, the most frequently studied category was delivery arrangement interventions, while implementation strategies and financial arrangements were less frequently studied. Also, governance arrangements domains were not studied. The most common combination of intervention strategies included self‐management with either telemedicine, use of information and smart home technologies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to expand potential interventions to other EPOC strategies to assess their potential effect on health outcomes in people with T1DM, as well as to involve more LMIC settings as the impact may be greater in these settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-24 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9306957/ /pubmed/35124856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14805 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Zafra‐Tanaka, Jessica H. Beran, David Bernabe‐Ortiz, Antonio Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title | Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title_full | Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title_short | Health system responses for type 1 diabetes: A scoping review |
title_sort | health system responses for type 1 diabetes: a scoping review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zafratanakajessicah healthsystemresponsesfortype1diabetesascopingreview AT berandavid healthsystemresponsesfortype1diabetesascopingreview AT bernabeortizantonio healthsystemresponsesfortype1diabetesascopingreview |