Cargando…

Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Biologic medications, specifically tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) inhibitors, have become increasingly prevalent in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease (CID) in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine pregnancy outcomes in women with CID exposed to biologics during pregnancy. SEAR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Byrne, Laura J., Alqatari, Safi G., Maher, Gillian M., O'Sullivan, Aoife M., Khashan, Ali S., Murphy, Grainne P., McCarthy, Fergus P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17093
_version_ 1784752664681119744
author O'Byrne, Laura J.
Alqatari, Safi G.
Maher, Gillian M.
O'Sullivan, Aoife M.
Khashan, Ali S.
Murphy, Grainne P.
McCarthy, Fergus P.
author_facet O'Byrne, Laura J.
Alqatari, Safi G.
Maher, Gillian M.
O'Sullivan, Aoife M.
Khashan, Ali S.
Murphy, Grainne P.
McCarthy, Fergus P.
author_sort O'Byrne, Laura J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic medications, specifically tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) inhibitors, have become increasingly prevalent in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease (CID) in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine pregnancy outcomes in women with CID exposed to biologics during pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through January 1998–July 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Peer‐reviewed, English‐language cohort, case–control, cross‐sectional studies, and case series that contained original data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently conducted data extraction. A meta‐analysis of proportions using a random‐effects model was used to pool outcomes. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the mean of proportions of outcomes across exposure groups using the ‘treated’ group as the reference category. All studies were evaluated using an appropriate quality assessment tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty‐five studies, describing 11 172 pregnancies, were eligible for inclusion. Analysis showed pooled proportions for congenital malformations as follows: treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.03–0.04; I (2) = 77) versus disease‐matched 0.04 (95% CI 0.03–0.05. I (2) = 86; p = 0.238); preterm delivery treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.10–0.14; I (2) = 88) versus disease‐matched 0.10 (95% CI 0.09–0.12; I (2) = 87; p = 0.250); severe neonatal infection: treated 0.05 (95% CI 0.03–0.07; I (2) = 88) versus disease‐matched 0.05 (95% CI 0.02–0.07; I (2) = 94; p = 0.970); low birthweight: treated 0.10 (95% CI 0.07–0.12; I (2) = 93) versus disease‐matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.07–0.09; I (2) = 0; p = 0.241); pooled miscarriage: treated 0.13 (95% CI 0.10–0.15; I (2) = 77) versus disease‐matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.11; I (2) = 5; p = 0.078); pre‐eclampsia; treated 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.02; I (2) = 0) versus disease‐matched 0.01 (95% CI 0.00–0.01; I (2) = 0; p = 0.193). No statistical differences in proportions were observed. GRADE certainty of findings was low to very low. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies exposed to biologics, disease‐matched controls and CID‐free pregnancies using the GRADE approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9306977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93069772022-07-28 Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis O'Byrne, Laura J. Alqatari, Safi G. Maher, Gillian M. O'Sullivan, Aoife M. Khashan, Ali S. Murphy, Grainne P. McCarthy, Fergus P. BJOG Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Biologic medications, specifically tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) inhibitors, have become increasingly prevalent in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease (CID) in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine pregnancy outcomes in women with CID exposed to biologics during pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through January 1998–July 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Peer‐reviewed, English‐language cohort, case–control, cross‐sectional studies, and case series that contained original data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently conducted data extraction. A meta‐analysis of proportions using a random‐effects model was used to pool outcomes. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the mean of proportions of outcomes across exposure groups using the ‘treated’ group as the reference category. All studies were evaluated using an appropriate quality assessment tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty‐five studies, describing 11 172 pregnancies, were eligible for inclusion. Analysis showed pooled proportions for congenital malformations as follows: treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.03–0.04; I (2) = 77) versus disease‐matched 0.04 (95% CI 0.03–0.05. I (2) = 86; p = 0.238); preterm delivery treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.10–0.14; I (2) = 88) versus disease‐matched 0.10 (95% CI 0.09–0.12; I (2) = 87; p = 0.250); severe neonatal infection: treated 0.05 (95% CI 0.03–0.07; I (2) = 88) versus disease‐matched 0.05 (95% CI 0.02–0.07; I (2) = 94; p = 0.970); low birthweight: treated 0.10 (95% CI 0.07–0.12; I (2) = 93) versus disease‐matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.07–0.09; I (2) = 0; p = 0.241); pooled miscarriage: treated 0.13 (95% CI 0.10–0.15; I (2) = 77) versus disease‐matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.11; I (2) = 5; p = 0.078); pre‐eclampsia; treated 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.02; I (2) = 0) versus disease‐matched 0.01 (95% CI 0.00–0.01; I (2) = 0; p = 0.193). No statistical differences in proportions were observed. GRADE certainty of findings was low to very low. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies exposed to biologics, disease‐matched controls and CID‐free pregnancies using the GRADE approach. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-02-16 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9306977/ /pubmed/35014759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17093 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
O'Byrne, Laura J.
Alqatari, Safi G.
Maher, Gillian M.
O'Sullivan, Aoife M.
Khashan, Ali S.
Murphy, Grainne P.
McCarthy, Fergus P.
Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17093
work_keys_str_mv AT obyrnelauraj fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alqatarisafig fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahergillianm fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT osullivanaoifem fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khashanalis fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murphygrainnep fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mccarthyfergusp fetalandmaternaloutcomesaftermaternalbiologicuseduringconceptionandpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis