Cargando…

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies

BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scquizzato, Tommaso, Bonaccorso, Alessandra, Consonni, Michela, Scandroglio, Anna Mara, Swol, Justyna, Landoni, Giovanni, Zangrillo, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205
_version_ 1784752672266518528
author Scquizzato, Tommaso
Bonaccorso, Alessandra
Consonni, Michela
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Swol, Justyna
Landoni, Giovanni
Zangrillo, Alberto
author_facet Scquizzato, Tommaso
Bonaccorso, Alessandra
Consonni, Michela
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Swol, Justyna
Landoni, Giovanni
Zangrillo, Alberto
author_sort Scquizzato, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to compare extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 28, 2021, for randomized trials and observational studies reporting propensity score‐matched data and comparing adults with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with those treated with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at the longest follow‐up available. Secondary outcomes were survival at the longest follow‐up available and survival at hospital discharge/30 days. RESULTS: We included six studies, two randomized and four propensity score‐matched studies. Patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation had higher rates of survival with favorable neurological outcome (81/584 [14%] vs. 46/593 [7.8%]; OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41–3.15; p < 0.001, number needed to treat 16) and of survival (131/584 [22%] vs. 102/593 [17%]; OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05–1.87; p = 0.02) at the longest follow‐up available compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge/30 days was similar between the two groups (142/584 [24%] vs. 122/593 [21%]; OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95–1.66; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomized trials and propensity score‐matched studies suggests increased survival and favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Large, multicentre randomized studies are still ongoing to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93070062022-07-28 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies Scquizzato, Tommaso Bonaccorso, Alessandra Consonni, Michela Scandroglio, Anna Mara Swol, Justyna Landoni, Giovanni Zangrillo, Alberto Artif Organs Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to compare extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 28, 2021, for randomized trials and observational studies reporting propensity score‐matched data and comparing adults with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with those treated with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at the longest follow‐up available. Secondary outcomes were survival at the longest follow‐up available and survival at hospital discharge/30 days. RESULTS: We included six studies, two randomized and four propensity score‐matched studies. Patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation had higher rates of survival with favorable neurological outcome (81/584 [14%] vs. 46/593 [7.8%]; OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41–3.15; p < 0.001, number needed to treat 16) and of survival (131/584 [22%] vs. 102/593 [17%]; OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05–1.87; p = 0.02) at the longest follow‐up available compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge/30 days was similar between the two groups (142/584 [24%] vs. 122/593 [21%]; OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95–1.66; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomized trials and propensity score‐matched studies suggests increased survival and favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Large, multicentre randomized studies are still ongoing to confirm these findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-23 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9307006/ /pubmed/35199375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Scquizzato, Tommaso
Bonaccorso, Alessandra
Consonni, Michela
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Swol, Justyna
Landoni, Giovanni
Zangrillo, Alberto
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title_full Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title_fullStr Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title_short Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
title_sort extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205
work_keys_str_mv AT scquizzatotommaso extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT bonaccorsoalessandra extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT consonnimichela extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT scandroglioannamara extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT swoljustyna extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT landonigiovanni extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies
AT zangrilloalberto extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies