Cargando…
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies
BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205 |
_version_ | 1784752672266518528 |
---|---|
author | Scquizzato, Tommaso Bonaccorso, Alessandra Consonni, Michela Scandroglio, Anna Mara Swol, Justyna Landoni, Giovanni Zangrillo, Alberto |
author_facet | Scquizzato, Tommaso Bonaccorso, Alessandra Consonni, Michela Scandroglio, Anna Mara Swol, Justyna Landoni, Giovanni Zangrillo, Alberto |
author_sort | Scquizzato, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to compare extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 28, 2021, for randomized trials and observational studies reporting propensity score‐matched data and comparing adults with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with those treated with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at the longest follow‐up available. Secondary outcomes were survival at the longest follow‐up available and survival at hospital discharge/30 days. RESULTS: We included six studies, two randomized and four propensity score‐matched studies. Patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation had higher rates of survival with favorable neurological outcome (81/584 [14%] vs. 46/593 [7.8%]; OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41–3.15; p < 0.001, number needed to treat 16) and of survival (131/584 [22%] vs. 102/593 [17%]; OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05–1.87; p = 0.02) at the longest follow‐up available compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge/30 days was similar between the two groups (142/584 [24%] vs. 122/593 [21%]; OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95–1.66; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomized trials and propensity score‐matched studies suggests increased survival and favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Large, multicentre randomized studies are still ongoing to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9307006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93070062022-07-28 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies Scquizzato, Tommaso Bonaccorso, Alessandra Consonni, Michela Scandroglio, Anna Mara Swol, Justyna Landoni, Giovanni Zangrillo, Alberto Artif Organs Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: In selected patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation represents a promising approach when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to compare extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 28, 2021, for randomized trials and observational studies reporting propensity score‐matched data and comparing adults with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with those treated with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at the longest follow‐up available. Secondary outcomes were survival at the longest follow‐up available and survival at hospital discharge/30 days. RESULTS: We included six studies, two randomized and four propensity score‐matched studies. Patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation had higher rates of survival with favorable neurological outcome (81/584 [14%] vs. 46/593 [7.8%]; OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41–3.15; p < 0.001, number needed to treat 16) and of survival (131/584 [22%] vs. 102/593 [17%]; OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05–1.87; p = 0.02) at the longest follow‐up available compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge/30 days was similar between the two groups (142/584 [24%] vs. 122/593 [21%]; OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95–1.66; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomized trials and propensity score‐matched studies suggests increased survival and favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Large, multicentre randomized studies are still ongoing to confirm these findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-23 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9307006/ /pubmed/35199375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Scquizzato, Tommaso Bonaccorso, Alessandra Consonni, Michela Scandroglio, Anna Mara Swol, Justyna Landoni, Giovanni Zangrillo, Alberto Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title | Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title_full | Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title_fullStr | Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title_short | Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
title_sort | extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and propensity score‐matched studies |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scquizzatotommaso extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT bonaccorsoalessandra extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT consonnimichela extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT scandroglioannamara extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT swoljustyna extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT landonigiovanni extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies AT zangrilloalberto extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedandpropensityscorematchedstudies |