Cargando…
Running a paediatric ambulatory sleep service in a pandemic and beyond
OBJECTIVES: In response COVID‐19, re‐establishing safe elective services was prioritised in the UK. We assess the impact on face‐to‐face hospital attendance, cost and efficiency of implementing a virtual sleep clinic (intervention 1) to screen for children requiring level 3 ambulatory sleep studies...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35171525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13918 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: In response COVID‐19, re‐establishing safe elective services was prioritised in the UK. We assess the impact on face‐to‐face hospital attendance, cost and efficiency of implementing a virtual sleep clinic (intervention 1) to screen for children requiring level 3 ambulatory sleep studies using newly implemented ENT‐UK guidelines for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) investigation (intervention 2). Objectives: (1) compare the proportion of children attending sleep clinic undertaking a sleep study before and after implementation of these interventions; (2) compare clinic cancellations and first‐time success rates of sleep studies before and after intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: District general hospital paediatric sleep clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 3 months to 16 years referred to sleep clinic by ENT for investigation of OSA over 3 months immediately following interventions (1 June 2020 – 1 September 2020) to the same period in the previous year (1 June 2019 – 1 September 2019). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of children attending sleep clinic, date of birth/age of children attending sleep clinic, number of children undergoing sleep study, diagnostic outcomes, number of appointment cancellations, number of first‐time sleep study failures. RESULTS: Post intervention, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of children undertaking ambulatory sleep studies, and nonsignificant reductions in appointment cancellations and in first‐time sleep study failures. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the virtual sleep clinic meant that only those children requiring a sleep study attended a face‐to‐face appointment, which led to reduced face‐to‐face attendance. There were also unintended cost‐effectiveness and efficiency benefits, with potential longer‐term learning implications for the wider sleep community and other diagnostic services. |
---|