Cargando…
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518 |
_version_ | 1784752694724919296 |
---|---|
author | Worlicek, Michael Schaumburger, Jens Springorum, Robert Maderbacher, Guenther Zeman, Florian Grifka, Joachim Baier, Clemens |
author_facet | Worlicek, Michael Schaumburger, Jens Springorum, Robert Maderbacher, Guenther Zeman, Florian Grifka, Joachim Baier, Clemens |
author_sort | Worlicek, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNE(TM) Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFC(TM) (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior–posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77–11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84–8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9307144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93071442022-08-04 In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design Worlicek, Michael Schaumburger, Jens Springorum, Robert Maderbacher, Guenther Zeman, Florian Grifka, Joachim Baier, Clemens Open Med (Wars) Research Article Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNE(TM) Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFC(TM) (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior–posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77–11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84–8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery. De Gruyter 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9307144/ /pubmed/35937001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518 Text en © 2022 Michael Worlicek et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Worlicek, Michael Schaumburger, Jens Springorum, Robert Maderbacher, Guenther Zeman, Florian Grifka, Joachim Baier, Clemens In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title |
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title_full |
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title_fullStr |
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title_short |
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
title_sort | in vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT worlicekmichael invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT schaumburgerjens invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT springorumrobert invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT maderbacherguenther invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT zemanflorian invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT grifkajoachim invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign AT baierclemens invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign |