Cargando…

In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design

Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Worlicek, Michael, Schaumburger, Jens, Springorum, Robert, Maderbacher, Guenther, Zeman, Florian, Grifka, Joachim, Baier, Clemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518
_version_ 1784752694724919296
author Worlicek, Michael
Schaumburger, Jens
Springorum, Robert
Maderbacher, Guenther
Zeman, Florian
Grifka, Joachim
Baier, Clemens
author_facet Worlicek, Michael
Schaumburger, Jens
Springorum, Robert
Maderbacher, Guenther
Zeman, Florian
Grifka, Joachim
Baier, Clemens
author_sort Worlicek, Michael
collection PubMed
description Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNE(TM) Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFC(TM) (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior–posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77–11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84–8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93071442022-08-04 In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design Worlicek, Michael Schaumburger, Jens Springorum, Robert Maderbacher, Guenther Zeman, Florian Grifka, Joachim Baier, Clemens Open Med (Wars) Research Article Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNE(TM) Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFC(TM) (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior–posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77–11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84–8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery. De Gruyter 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9307144/ /pubmed/35937001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518 Text en © 2022 Michael Worlicek et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Worlicek, Michael
Schaumburger, Jens
Springorum, Robert
Maderbacher, Guenther
Zeman, Florian
Grifka, Joachim
Baier, Clemens
In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title_full In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title_fullStr In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title_full_unstemmed In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title_short In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
title_sort in vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2022-0518
work_keys_str_mv AT worlicekmichael invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT schaumburgerjens invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT springorumrobert invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT maderbacherguenther invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT zemanflorian invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT grifkajoachim invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign
AT baierclemens invivokneekinematicsofaninnovativeprosthesisdesign