Cargando…

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale

BACKGROUND: In recent years, oral care for older people has received extensive attention in long-term care facilities. The Self-Efficacy for Providing Mouth Care (SE-PMC) and Attitudes for Providing Mouth Care (A-PMC) scale evaluated the self-efficacy and attitude of nursing staff while providing or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lan, Gu, Liyan, Li, Xianchen, Chen, Wenyao, Zhang, Lingjuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271800
_version_ 1784752696227528704
author Chen, Lan
Gu, Liyan
Li, Xianchen
Chen, Wenyao
Zhang, Lingjuan
author_facet Chen, Lan
Gu, Liyan
Li, Xianchen
Chen, Wenyao
Zhang, Lingjuan
author_sort Chen, Lan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, oral care for older people has received extensive attention in long-term care facilities. The Self-Efficacy for Providing Mouth Care (SE-PMC) and Attitudes for Providing Mouth Care (A-PMC) scale evaluated the self-efficacy and attitude of nursing staff while providing oral care. However, whether this scale is valid and reliable for Chinese nursing staff in China remains unverified. This study aims to translate the English version of SE-PMC and A-PMC into Chinese and determine their reliability and validity. METHODS: After obtaining the author’s consent, the procedure for a double-back translation and cross-cultural adaptation was conducted to develop the Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC. The validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC were evaluated in a cross-sectional observational study with 852 nurses from 42 Geriatric Care Facilities (GCFs). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 427) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 425) were conducted to test the construct validity and quality of the factor structures. We applied the item discrimination test and homogeneity test for item analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and split-half coefficient were adopted to evaluate internal consistency. RESULTS: The Chinese version of SE-PMC (11 items, 3 factors) and A-PMC (11 items, 2 factors) included 22 items, reflecting adequate construct validity and reliability. In addition, test-retest reliability was 0.809 for SE-PMC and 0.811 for A-PMC, evincing good stability. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of SE-PMC was 0.831, with each factor ranging from 0.793~0.906. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the A-PMC was 0.768, with each factor ranging from 0.814~0.824. Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of SE-PMC and A-PMC ranged from 0.84 ~1.00 and 0.82~1.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC was validated as a reliable assessment tool to evaluate the self-efficacy and attitude of nursing staff in GCFs for providing oral care in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93071522022-07-23 Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale Chen, Lan Gu, Liyan Li, Xianchen Chen, Wenyao Zhang, Lingjuan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, oral care for older people has received extensive attention in long-term care facilities. The Self-Efficacy for Providing Mouth Care (SE-PMC) and Attitudes for Providing Mouth Care (A-PMC) scale evaluated the self-efficacy and attitude of nursing staff while providing oral care. However, whether this scale is valid and reliable for Chinese nursing staff in China remains unverified. This study aims to translate the English version of SE-PMC and A-PMC into Chinese and determine their reliability and validity. METHODS: After obtaining the author’s consent, the procedure for a double-back translation and cross-cultural adaptation was conducted to develop the Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC. The validity and reliability of the Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC were evaluated in a cross-sectional observational study with 852 nurses from 42 Geriatric Care Facilities (GCFs). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 427) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 425) were conducted to test the construct validity and quality of the factor structures. We applied the item discrimination test and homogeneity test for item analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and split-half coefficient were adopted to evaluate internal consistency. RESULTS: The Chinese version of SE-PMC (11 items, 3 factors) and A-PMC (11 items, 2 factors) included 22 items, reflecting adequate construct validity and reliability. In addition, test-retest reliability was 0.809 for SE-PMC and 0.811 for A-PMC, evincing good stability. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of SE-PMC was 0.831, with each factor ranging from 0.793~0.906. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the A-PMC was 0.768, with each factor ranging from 0.814~0.824. Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of SE-PMC and A-PMC ranged from 0.84 ~1.00 and 0.82~1.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of SE-PMC and A-PMC was validated as a reliable assessment tool to evaluate the self-efficacy and attitude of nursing staff in GCFs for providing oral care in China. Public Library of Science 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9307152/ /pubmed/35867694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271800 Text en © 2022 Chen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Lan
Gu, Liyan
Li, Xianchen
Chen, Wenyao
Zhang, Lingjuan
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title_full Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title_fullStr Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title_full_unstemmed Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title_short Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing Mouth Care scale
title_sort translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the chinese version of self-efficacy and attitudes for providing mouth care scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271800
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlan translationcrossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofselfefficacyandattitudesforprovidingmouthcarescale
AT guliyan translationcrossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofselfefficacyandattitudesforprovidingmouthcarescale
AT lixianchen translationcrossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofselfefficacyandattitudesforprovidingmouthcarescale
AT chenwenyao translationcrossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofselfefficacyandattitudesforprovidingmouthcarescale
AT zhanglingjuan translationcrossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofselfefficacyandattitudesforprovidingmouthcarescale