Cargando…
Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide
Dose reduction (DR) of biologics, where possible, seems promising for more efficient use of expensive biologics. For implementation of DR strategies, it is essential to get insight in factors that influence implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and behaviour regar...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34467442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02273-4 |
_version_ | 1784752782747631616 |
---|---|
author | van Muijen, M. E. van der Schoot, L. S. van den Reek, J. M. P. A. de Jong, E. M. G. J. |
author_facet | van Muijen, M. E. van der Schoot, L. S. van den Reek, J. M. P. A. de Jong, E. M. G. J. |
author_sort | van Muijen, M. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dose reduction (DR) of biologics, where possible, seems promising for more efficient use of expensive biologics. For implementation of DR strategies, it is essential to get insight in factors that influence implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologic therapies for psoriasis among psoriasis expert dermatologists worldwide. A 27-question e-survey was sent through the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) to its 114 dermatologist councilors worldwide. The survey assessed demographics, general and DR prescription behaviour, and motivations for and barriers against application of DR. Of 57 respondents, 53 respondents who prescribed biologics were included for analysis. Thirty-seven (69.8%) applied DR (i.e., ‘DR dermatologists’), and 16 (30.2%) did not (i.e., ‘Non-DR dermatologists’). DR strategies varied among respondents. Regarding criteria for starting DR, differences were reported in required treatment duration, and interpretation and duration of stable low disease activity. In addition, the prolongation of intervals between injections varied between respondents. For most ‘DR dermatologists’ (n = 32/37, 86.5%), cost savings were one of the main reasons to apply DR. Fifteen out of 16 ‘Non-DR dermatologists’ (94%) did not apply DR due to lack of scientific evidence. In conclusion, DR of biologics for psoriasis is part of clinical practice in psoriasis experts globally. Barriers for applying DR included lack of evidence or guidelines, and uncertainty on DR effects and risks. Although growing evidence shows DR feasibility, future studies are needed to accumulate and broaden evidence, along with development of (inter)national guidelines on DR strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00403-021-02273-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9307528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93075282022-07-24 Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide van Muijen, M. E. van der Schoot, L. S. van den Reek, J. M. P. A. de Jong, E. M. G. J. Arch Dermatol Res Original Paper Dose reduction (DR) of biologics, where possible, seems promising for more efficient use of expensive biologics. For implementation of DR strategies, it is essential to get insight in factors that influence implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologic therapies for psoriasis among psoriasis expert dermatologists worldwide. A 27-question e-survey was sent through the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) to its 114 dermatologist councilors worldwide. The survey assessed demographics, general and DR prescription behaviour, and motivations for and barriers against application of DR. Of 57 respondents, 53 respondents who prescribed biologics were included for analysis. Thirty-seven (69.8%) applied DR (i.e., ‘DR dermatologists’), and 16 (30.2%) did not (i.e., ‘Non-DR dermatologists’). DR strategies varied among respondents. Regarding criteria for starting DR, differences were reported in required treatment duration, and interpretation and duration of stable low disease activity. In addition, the prolongation of intervals between injections varied between respondents. For most ‘DR dermatologists’ (n = 32/37, 86.5%), cost savings were one of the main reasons to apply DR. Fifteen out of 16 ‘Non-DR dermatologists’ (94%) did not apply DR due to lack of scientific evidence. In conclusion, DR of biologics for psoriasis is part of clinical practice in psoriasis experts globally. Barriers for applying DR included lack of evidence or guidelines, and uncertainty on DR effects and risks. Although growing evidence shows DR feasibility, future studies are needed to accumulate and broaden evidence, along with development of (inter)national guidelines on DR strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00403-021-02273-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9307528/ /pubmed/34467442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02273-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van Muijen, M. E. van der Schoot, L. S. van den Reek, J. M. P. A. de Jong, E. M. G. J. Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title | Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title_full | Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title_fullStr | Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title_short | Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
title_sort | attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34467442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02273-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmuijenme attitudesandbehaviourregardingdosereductionofbiologicsforpsoriasisasurveyamongdermatologistsworldwide AT vanderschootls attitudesandbehaviourregardingdosereductionofbiologicsforpsoriasisasurveyamongdermatologistsworldwide AT vandenreekjmpa attitudesandbehaviourregardingdosereductionofbiologicsforpsoriasisasurveyamongdermatologistsworldwide AT dejongemgj attitudesandbehaviourregardingdosereductionofbiologicsforpsoriasisasurveyamongdermatologistsworldwide |