Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing general, local and surgical variables possibly influencing the results. METHODS: Patients with residual crestal height < 5 mm un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, Teresa, Lamazza, Luca, Bernardello, Fabio, Ziętek, Grzegorz, Stacchi, Claudio, Troiano, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00431-5
_version_ 1784752820813037568
author Lombardi, Teresa
Lamazza, Luca
Bernardello, Fabio
Ziętek, Grzegorz
Stacchi, Claudio
Troiano, Giuseppe
author_facet Lombardi, Teresa
Lamazza, Luca
Bernardello, Fabio
Ziętek, Grzegorz
Stacchi, Claudio
Troiano, Giuseppe
author_sort Lombardi, Teresa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing general, local and surgical variables possibly influencing the results. METHODS: Patients with residual crestal height < 5 mm underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation with xenograft in gel form to allow the placement of a single implant. Simultaneous implant placement was performed when primary stability was ≥ 15 Ncm. Graft height was measured immediately after surgery (T0) and after 6 months of healing (T1). Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to assess associations between clinical variables with implant survival and graft height at T1. RESULTS: 71 patients underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation and 54 implants were simultaneously placed. Delayed implant placement (at T1) was possible in 5 cases out of 17 (29.4%), whereas in 12 patients (70.6%) implant insertion was not possible or required additional sinus grafting. Implant survival rate, with a follow-up varying from 12 to 32 months after loading, was 100%. Mean pre-operative bone height was 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, at T0 was 13.9 ± 2.2 mm and at T1 was 9.9 ± 2.8 mm. Bone height at T1 was negatively influenced by membrane perforation at surgery (p = 0.004) and positively influenced by immediate implant insertion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcrestal sinus floor elevation performed with injectable xenograft gel resulted in 100% implant survival rate. However, immediate implant insertion seems a crucial factor to preserve vertical bone gain: one-stage technique seems to be the most predictable approach to optimize clinical outcomes with this approach. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05305521. Registered 31 March 2022—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05305521.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93076982022-07-24 Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study Lombardi, Teresa Lamazza, Luca Bernardello, Fabio Ziętek, Grzegorz Stacchi, Claudio Troiano, Giuseppe Int J Implant Dent Research PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing general, local and surgical variables possibly influencing the results. METHODS: Patients with residual crestal height < 5 mm underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation with xenograft in gel form to allow the placement of a single implant. Simultaneous implant placement was performed when primary stability was ≥ 15 Ncm. Graft height was measured immediately after surgery (T0) and after 6 months of healing (T1). Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to assess associations between clinical variables with implant survival and graft height at T1. RESULTS: 71 patients underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation and 54 implants were simultaneously placed. Delayed implant placement (at T1) was possible in 5 cases out of 17 (29.4%), whereas in 12 patients (70.6%) implant insertion was not possible or required additional sinus grafting. Implant survival rate, with a follow-up varying from 12 to 32 months after loading, was 100%. Mean pre-operative bone height was 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, at T0 was 13.9 ± 2.2 mm and at T1 was 9.9 ± 2.8 mm. Bone height at T1 was negatively influenced by membrane perforation at surgery (p = 0.004) and positively influenced by immediate implant insertion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcrestal sinus floor elevation performed with injectable xenograft gel resulted in 100% implant survival rate. However, immediate implant insertion seems a crucial factor to preserve vertical bone gain: one-stage technique seems to be the most predictable approach to optimize clinical outcomes with this approach. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05305521. Registered 31 March 2022—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05305521. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9307698/ /pubmed/35867239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00431-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lombardi, Teresa
Lamazza, Luca
Bernardello, Fabio
Ziętek, Grzegorz
Stacchi, Claudio
Troiano, Giuseppe
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title_full Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title_short Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
title_sort clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35867239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00431-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lombarditeresa clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT lamazzaluca clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT bernardellofabio clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT zietekgrzegorz clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT stacchiclaudio clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT troianogiuseppe clinicalandradiographicoutcomesfollowingtranscrestalmaxillarysinusfloorelevationwithinjectablexenogenousbonesubstituteingelformaprospectivemulticenterstudy