Cargando…

Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES: In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk factors, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Keita, Nagumo, Hironobu, Ashikawa, Takashi, Funato, Tomoyuki, Nakaji, So, Matsui, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153
_version_ 1784752826588594176
author Saito, Keita
Nagumo, Hironobu
Ashikawa, Takashi
Funato, Tomoyuki
Nakaji, So
Matsui, Hiroki
author_facet Saito, Keita
Nagumo, Hironobu
Ashikawa, Takashi
Funato, Tomoyuki
Nakaji, So
Matsui, Hiroki
author_sort Saito, Keita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk factors, and developed a predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding. METHODS: We included 2272 gastric ESD cases from our hospital between May 2003 and June 2021 and classified them into two groups: 1789 cases before and 483 after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. A predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding was developed using the pre‐publication cohort data. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving warfarin decreased (5.0% vs. 1.4%) and those receiving direct oral anticoagulants increased (1.2% vs. 6.8%) after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. Post‐ESD bleeding occurred in 61 patients, but there was no significant difference in the bleeding rate between the groups (50 [2.8%] vs. 11 [2.3%] patients, respectively). Five risk factors (number of antithrombotic agents, dialysis, heparin replacement, resection specimen size, and procedure time) were identified for model development. The C‐statistic for the model and post‐publication cohorts were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. In the model, each risk factor for postoperative bleeding was scored, and the risk was classified into three levels according to the total score. Bleeding rates at low, intermediate, and high risks were 1.6%, 10.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite changes in patient characteristics and clinical practice regarding ESD before and after the publication of the supplementary guidelines, we could still develop a simple and useful predictive model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93077232022-07-26 Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study Saito, Keita Nagumo, Hironobu Ashikawa, Takashi Funato, Tomoyuki Nakaji, So Matsui, Hiroki DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk factors, and developed a predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding. METHODS: We included 2272 gastric ESD cases from our hospital between May 2003 and June 2021 and classified them into two groups: 1789 cases before and 483 after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. A predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding was developed using the pre‐publication cohort data. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving warfarin decreased (5.0% vs. 1.4%) and those receiving direct oral anticoagulants increased (1.2% vs. 6.8%) after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. Post‐ESD bleeding occurred in 61 patients, but there was no significant difference in the bleeding rate between the groups (50 [2.8%] vs. 11 [2.3%] patients, respectively). Five risk factors (number of antithrombotic agents, dialysis, heparin replacement, resection specimen size, and procedure time) were identified for model development. The C‐statistic for the model and post‐publication cohorts were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. In the model, each risk factor for postoperative bleeding was scored, and the risk was classified into three levels according to the total score. Bleeding rates at low, intermediate, and high risks were 1.6%, 10.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite changes in patient characteristics and clinical practice regarding ESD before and after the publication of the supplementary guidelines, we could still develop a simple and useful predictive model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9307723/ /pubmed/35898839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Saito, Keita
Nagumo, Hironobu
Ashikawa, Takashi
Funato, Tomoyuki
Nakaji, So
Matsui, Hiroki
Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_full Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_fullStr Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_short Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_sort predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: a single‐center retrospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153
work_keys_str_mv AT saitokeita predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT nagumohironobu predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT ashikawatakashi predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT funatotomoyuki predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT nakajiso predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT matsuihiroki predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy