Cargando…
Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis
OBJECTIVES: Combined biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) represent a challenging clinical scenario despite developments in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as GOO might impair EUS‐guided biliary drainage. Little is known about the effectiveness of different therapeut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.132 |
_version_ | 1784752826864369664 |
---|---|
author | Vanella, Giuseppe Bronswijk, Michiel van Wanrooij, Roy LJ Dell'Anna, Giuseppe Laleman, Wim van Malenstein, Hannah Voermans, Rogier P Fockens, Paul Van der Merwe, Schalk Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio |
author_facet | Vanella, Giuseppe Bronswijk, Michiel van Wanrooij, Roy LJ Dell'Anna, Giuseppe Laleman, Wim van Malenstein, Hannah Voermans, Rogier P Fockens, Paul Van der Merwe, Schalk Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio |
author_sort | Vanella, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Combined biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) represent a challenging clinical scenario despite developments in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as GOO might impair EUS‐guided biliary drainage. Little is known about the effectiveness of different therapeutic combinations used to treat double obstruction, especially regarding stent patency. METHODS: All consecutive patients with double obstruction treated between 2016 and 2021 in three tertiary academic centres were eligible for inclusion. Five combinations involving enteral stenting (ES), EUS‐guided gastroenterostomy (EUS‐GE), hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS), choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CDS), and transpapillary biliary stenting (TPS) were evaluated for dysfunction during follow‐up, either as proportions or dysfunction‐free survival (DFS) using Kaplan–Meier estimates. RESULTS: Ninety‐three patients were included (male 46%; age 67 [interquartile range 60–76] years; pancreatic cancer 73%, metastatic 57%), resulting in 103 procedure combinations. Different combinations showed significantly different overall dysfunction rates (p = 0.009), ranging from the null rate of EUS‐GE+HG to the 18% rate of EUS‐GE+TPS, 31% of EUS‐GE+EUS‐CD, 53% of ES+TPS and 83% of ES+EUS‐CDS. Sub‐analyses restricted to biliary dysfunction confirmed these trends. A multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression of DFS, a stenosis distal to the papilla (HR 3.2 [1.5–6.9]) and ES+EUS‐CDS (HR 5.6 [2–15.7]) independently predicted dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of statistical power per combination, this study introduces new associations beyond the increased risk of GOO recurrence with ES versus EUS‐GE. EUS‐CDS showed reduced effectiveness and frequent dysfunction in the context of GOO, especially when combined with ES. EUS‐GE+HGS or EUS‐GE+TPS in this setting might result in superior patency. These results suggest that a prospective evaluation of the optimal endoscopic approach to malignant double obstruction is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9307724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93077242022-07-26 Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis Vanella, Giuseppe Bronswijk, Michiel van Wanrooij, Roy LJ Dell'Anna, Giuseppe Laleman, Wim van Malenstein, Hannah Voermans, Rogier P Fockens, Paul Van der Merwe, Schalk Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Combined biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) represent a challenging clinical scenario despite developments in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as GOO might impair EUS‐guided biliary drainage. Little is known about the effectiveness of different therapeutic combinations used to treat double obstruction, especially regarding stent patency. METHODS: All consecutive patients with double obstruction treated between 2016 and 2021 in three tertiary academic centres were eligible for inclusion. Five combinations involving enteral stenting (ES), EUS‐guided gastroenterostomy (EUS‐GE), hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS), choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CDS), and transpapillary biliary stenting (TPS) were evaluated for dysfunction during follow‐up, either as proportions or dysfunction‐free survival (DFS) using Kaplan–Meier estimates. RESULTS: Ninety‐three patients were included (male 46%; age 67 [interquartile range 60–76] years; pancreatic cancer 73%, metastatic 57%), resulting in 103 procedure combinations. Different combinations showed significantly different overall dysfunction rates (p = 0.009), ranging from the null rate of EUS‐GE+HG to the 18% rate of EUS‐GE+TPS, 31% of EUS‐GE+EUS‐CD, 53% of ES+TPS and 83% of ES+EUS‐CDS. Sub‐analyses restricted to biliary dysfunction confirmed these trends. A multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression of DFS, a stenosis distal to the papilla (HR 3.2 [1.5–6.9]) and ES+EUS‐CDS (HR 5.6 [2–15.7]) independently predicted dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of statistical power per combination, this study introduces new associations beyond the increased risk of GOO recurrence with ES versus EUS‐GE. EUS‐CDS showed reduced effectiveness and frequent dysfunction in the context of GOO, especially when combined with ES. EUS‐GE+HGS or EUS‐GE+TPS in this setting might result in superior patency. These results suggest that a prospective evaluation of the optimal endoscopic approach to malignant double obstruction is needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9307724/ /pubmed/35898844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.132 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vanella, Giuseppe Bronswijk, Michiel van Wanrooij, Roy LJ Dell'Anna, Giuseppe Laleman, Wim van Malenstein, Hannah Voermans, Rogier P Fockens, Paul Van der Merwe, Schalk Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title | Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title_full | Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title_short | Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis |
title_sort | combined endoscopic management of biliary and gastric outlet obstruction (cabriolet study): a multicenter retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanellagiuseppe combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT bronswijkmichiel combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT vanwanrooijroylj combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT dellannagiuseppe combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT lalemanwim combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT vanmalensteinhannah combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT voermansrogierp combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT fockenspaul combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT vandermerweschalk combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT arcidiaconopaologiorgio combinedendoscopicmanagementofbiliaryandgastricoutletobstructioncabrioletstudyamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis |