Cargando…

Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis

OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Akashi, Ryozawa, Shomei, Tanisaka, Yuki, Ogawa, Tomoya, Saito, Yoichi, Katsuda, Hiromune, Miyaguchi, Kazuya, Yasuda, Masanori, Araki, Ryuichiro, Mashimo, Yumi, Tashima, Tomoaki, Nakano, Yuya, Terada, Rie, Jinushi, Ryuhei, Mizuide, Masafumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147
_version_ 1784752828590325760
author Fujita, Akashi
Ryozawa, Shomei
Tanisaka, Yuki
Ogawa, Tomoya
Saito, Yoichi
Katsuda, Hiromune
Miyaguchi, Kazuya
Yasuda, Masanori
Araki, Ryuichiro
Mashimo, Yumi
Tashima, Tomoaki
Nakano, Yuya
Terada, Rie
Jinushi, Ryuhei
Mizuide, Masafumi
author_facet Fujita, Akashi
Ryozawa, Shomei
Tanisaka, Yuki
Ogawa, Tomoya
Saito, Yoichi
Katsuda, Hiromune
Miyaguchi, Kazuya
Yasuda, Masanori
Araki, Ryuichiro
Mashimo, Yumi
Tashima, Tomoaki
Nakano, Yuya
Terada, Rie
Jinushi, Ryuhei
Mizuide, Masafumi
author_sort Fujita, Akashi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork‐tip needles in EUS‐FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS‐FNB using a 22‐G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22‐G Fork‐tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity‐matched analysis and confounder adjustment. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork‐tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.58, 0.25) between the two groups. The rate of changes in the operator from that of a trainee to an expert was less in the Fork‐tip group (4.4%, 2/45) than in the Franseen group (15.6%, 7/45), but not significantly different (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9307731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93077312022-07-26 Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis Fujita, Akashi Ryozawa, Shomei Tanisaka, Yuki Ogawa, Tomoya Saito, Yoichi Katsuda, Hiromune Miyaguchi, Kazuya Yasuda, Masanori Araki, Ryuichiro Mashimo, Yumi Tashima, Tomoaki Nakano, Yuya Terada, Rie Jinushi, Ryuhei Mizuide, Masafumi DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork‐tip needles in EUS‐FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS‐FNB using a 22‐G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22‐G Fork‐tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity‐matched analysis and confounder adjustment. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork‐tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.58, 0.25) between the two groups. The rate of changes in the operator from that of a trainee to an expert was less in the Fork‐tip group (4.4%, 2/45) than in the Franseen group (15.6%, 7/45), but not significantly different (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9307731/ /pubmed/35898843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fujita, Akashi
Ryozawa, Shomei
Tanisaka, Yuki
Ogawa, Tomoya
Saito, Yoichi
Katsuda, Hiromune
Miyaguchi, Kazuya
Yasuda, Masanori
Araki, Ryuichiro
Mashimo, Yumi
Tashima, Tomoaki
Nakano, Yuya
Terada, Rie
Jinushi, Ryuhei
Mizuide, Masafumi
Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title_full Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title_short Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
title_sort comparison of fork‐tip and franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: a propensity‐matched analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitaakashi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT ryozawashomei comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT tanisakayuki comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT ogawatomoya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT saitoyoichi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT katsudahiromune comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT miyaguchikazuya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT yasudamasanori comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT arakiryuichiro comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT mashimoyumi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT tashimatomoaki comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT nakanoyuya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT teradarie comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT jinushiryuhei comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT mizuidemasafumi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis