Cargando…
Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis
OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic acc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147 |
_version_ | 1784752828590325760 |
---|---|
author | Fujita, Akashi Ryozawa, Shomei Tanisaka, Yuki Ogawa, Tomoya Saito, Yoichi Katsuda, Hiromune Miyaguchi, Kazuya Yasuda, Masanori Araki, Ryuichiro Mashimo, Yumi Tashima, Tomoaki Nakano, Yuya Terada, Rie Jinushi, Ryuhei Mizuide, Masafumi |
author_facet | Fujita, Akashi Ryozawa, Shomei Tanisaka, Yuki Ogawa, Tomoya Saito, Yoichi Katsuda, Hiromune Miyaguchi, Kazuya Yasuda, Masanori Araki, Ryuichiro Mashimo, Yumi Tashima, Tomoaki Nakano, Yuya Terada, Rie Jinushi, Ryuhei Mizuide, Masafumi |
author_sort | Fujita, Akashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork‐tip needles in EUS‐FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS‐FNB using a 22‐G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22‐G Fork‐tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity‐matched analysis and confounder adjustment. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork‐tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.58, 0.25) between the two groups. The rate of changes in the operator from that of a trainee to an expert was less in the Fork‐tip group (4.4%, 2/45) than in the Franseen group (15.6%, 7/45), but not significantly different (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9307731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93077312022-07-26 Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis Fujita, Akashi Ryozawa, Shomei Tanisaka, Yuki Ogawa, Tomoya Saito, Yoichi Katsuda, Hiromune Miyaguchi, Kazuya Yasuda, Masanori Araki, Ryuichiro Mashimo, Yumi Tashima, Tomoaki Nakano, Yuya Terada, Rie Jinushi, Ryuhei Mizuide, Masafumi DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork‐tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork‐tip needles in EUS‐FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS‐FNB using a 22‐G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22‐G Fork‐tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity‐matched analysis and confounder adjustment. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork‐tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.58, 0.25) between the two groups. The rate of changes in the operator from that of a trainee to an expert was less in the Fork‐tip group (4.4%, 2/45) than in the Franseen group (15.6%, 7/45), but not significantly different (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9307731/ /pubmed/35898843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fujita, Akashi Ryozawa, Shomei Tanisaka, Yuki Ogawa, Tomoya Saito, Yoichi Katsuda, Hiromune Miyaguchi, Kazuya Yasuda, Masanori Araki, Ryuichiro Mashimo, Yumi Tashima, Tomoaki Nakano, Yuya Terada, Rie Jinushi, Ryuhei Mizuide, Masafumi Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title | Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Fork‐tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity‐matched analysis |
title_sort | comparison of fork‐tip and franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: a propensity‐matched analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujitaakashi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT ryozawashomei comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT tanisakayuki comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT ogawatomoya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT saitoyoichi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT katsudahiromune comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT miyaguchikazuya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT yasudamasanori comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT arakiryuichiro comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT mashimoyumi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT tashimatomoaki comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT nakanoyuya comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT teradarie comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT jinushiryuhei comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis AT mizuidemasafumi comparisonofforktipandfranseenneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyinpancreaticsolidlesionsapropensitymatchedanalysis |