Cargando…
Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. lat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 |
_version_ | 1784752939960631296 |
---|---|
author | Cappa, Eduardo P. Chen, Charles Klutsch, Jennifer G. Sebastian-Azcona, Jaime Ratcliffe, Blaise Wei, Xiaojing Da Ros, Letitia Ullah, Aziz Liu, Yang Benowicz, Andy Sadoway, Shane Mansfield, Shawn D. Erbilgin, Nadir Thomas, Barb R. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. |
author_facet | Cappa, Eduardo P. Chen, Charles Klutsch, Jennifer G. Sebastian-Azcona, Jaime Ratcliffe, Blaise Wei, Xiaojing Da Ros, Letitia Ullah, Aziz Liu, Yang Benowicz, Andy Sadoway, Shane Mansfield, Shawn D. Erbilgin, Nadir Thomas, Barb R. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. |
author_sort | Cappa, Eduardo P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. RESULTS: MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. CONCLUSIONS: The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9308220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93082202022-07-24 Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine Cappa, Eduardo P. Chen, Charles Klutsch, Jennifer G. Sebastian-Azcona, Jaime Ratcliffe, Blaise Wei, Xiaojing Da Ros, Letitia Ullah, Aziz Liu, Yang Benowicz, Andy Sadoway, Shane Mansfield, Shawn D. Erbilgin, Nadir Thomas, Barb R. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. RESULTS: MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. CONCLUSIONS: The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9308220/ /pubmed/35870886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cappa, Eduardo P. Chen, Charles Klutsch, Jennifer G. Sebastian-Azcona, Jaime Ratcliffe, Blaise Wei, Xiaojing Da Ros, Letitia Ullah, Aziz Liu, Yang Benowicz, Andy Sadoway, Shane Mansfield, Shawn D. Erbilgin, Nadir Thomas, Barb R. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title | Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title_full | Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title_fullStr | Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title_short | Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
title_sort | multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappaeduardop multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT chencharles multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT klutschjenniferg multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT sebastianazconajaime multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT ratcliffeblaise multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT weixiaojing multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT darosletitia multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT ullahaziz multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT liuyang multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT benowiczandy multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT sadowayshane multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT mansfieldshawnd multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT erbilginnadir multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT thomasbarbr multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine AT elkassabyyousrya multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine |