Cargando…
Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health
BACKGROUND: Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9 |
_version_ | 1784752966496944128 |
---|---|
author | Dykxhoorn, Jennifer Fischer, Laura Bayliss, Becca Brayne, Carol Crosby, Liam Galvin, Bobbie Geijer-Simpson, Emma Jones, Oliver Kaner, Eileen Lafortune, Louise McGrath, Michael Moehring, Paula Osborn, David Petermann, Mylene Remes, Olivia Vadgama, Ami Walters, Kate |
author_facet | Dykxhoorn, Jennifer Fischer, Laura Bayliss, Becca Brayne, Carol Crosby, Liam Galvin, Bobbie Geijer-Simpson, Emma Jones, Oliver Kaner, Eileen Lafortune, Louise McGrath, Michael Moehring, Paula Osborn, David Petermann, Mylene Remes, Olivia Vadgama, Ami Walters, Kate |
author_sort | Dykxhoorn, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework. METHODS: The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic. RESULTS: We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9308351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93083512022-07-24 Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health Dykxhoorn, Jennifer Fischer, Laura Bayliss, Becca Brayne, Carol Crosby, Liam Galvin, Bobbie Geijer-Simpson, Emma Jones, Oliver Kaner, Eileen Lafortune, Louise McGrath, Michael Moehring, Paula Osborn, David Petermann, Mylene Remes, Olivia Vadgama, Ami Walters, Kate BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework. METHODS: The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic. RESULTS: We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9. BioMed Central 2022-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9308351/ /pubmed/35870910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dykxhoorn, Jennifer Fischer, Laura Bayliss, Becca Brayne, Carol Crosby, Liam Galvin, Bobbie Geijer-Simpson, Emma Jones, Oliver Kaner, Eileen Lafortune, Louise McGrath, Michael Moehring, Paula Osborn, David Petermann, Mylene Remes, Olivia Vadgama, Ami Walters, Kate Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title | Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title_full | Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title_fullStr | Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title_full_unstemmed | Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title_short | Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
title_sort | conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dykxhoornjennifer conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT fischerlaura conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT baylissbecca conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT braynecarol conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT crosbyliam conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT galvinbobbie conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT geijersimpsonemma conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT jonesoliver conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT kanereileen conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT lafortunelouise conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT mcgrathmichael conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT moehringpaula conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT osborndavid conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT petermannmylene conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT remesolivia conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT vadgamaami conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth AT walterskate conceptualisingpublicmentalhealthdevelopmentofaconceptualframeworkforpublicmentalhealth |