Cargando…
Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4 |
_version_ | 1784752989823565824 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Yusuf Pereira, Austin Rai, Amrit S. Leung, Victoria C. Ahmed, Aadam Rai, Amandeep S. |
author_facet | Ahmed, Yusuf Pereira, Austin Rai, Amrit S. Leung, Victoria C. Ahmed, Aadam Rai, Amandeep S. |
author_sort | Ahmed, Yusuf |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice medical trainees using either an unmodified iPhone X or standard direct ophthalmoscope. The primary outcome was the mean difference and degree of agreement in cup-to-disc ratio between student examination and the staff ophthalmologist’s cup-to-disc observation. RESULTS: A total of 18 medical students conducted 230 retinal examinations, 117 with the iPhone X and 113 with the direct ophthalmoscope. A greater proportion of students were unable to report cup-to-disc ratio using the iPhone X (81.2%) vs direct ophthalmoscope (30.1%). Student examination of cup-to-disc ratio led to a systematic bias (95% limits of agreement) of + 0.16 (−0.22 to + 0.54) and + 0.10 (−0.36 to + 0.56) with the iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope, respectively. iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope student observation concordance for optic disc colour (88.7 and 82.4%, respectively) and contour (68.3 and 74.2%, respectively) demonstrated low agreement with staff ophthalmologist findings. Student iPhone X observations demonstrated lower agreement with staff findings compared to direct ophthalmoscope observations for spontaneous venous pulsations (Cohen’s Kappa = −0.044 vs 0.099). CONCLUSION: Amongst medical trainees, optic disc visualization using an unmodified iPhone X was inferior to the direct ophthalmoscope. When able to visualize the optic nerve head, there was no significant difference in reported cup-to-disc ratio between modalities. However, both modalities demonstrated poor reliability in comparison to staff ophthalmologist findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9308475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93084752022-07-25 Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X Ahmed, Yusuf Pereira, Austin Rai, Amrit S. Leung, Victoria C. Ahmed, Aadam Rai, Amandeep S. Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice medical trainees using either an unmodified iPhone X or standard direct ophthalmoscope. The primary outcome was the mean difference and degree of agreement in cup-to-disc ratio between student examination and the staff ophthalmologist’s cup-to-disc observation. RESULTS: A total of 18 medical students conducted 230 retinal examinations, 117 with the iPhone X and 113 with the direct ophthalmoscope. A greater proportion of students were unable to report cup-to-disc ratio using the iPhone X (81.2%) vs direct ophthalmoscope (30.1%). Student examination of cup-to-disc ratio led to a systematic bias (95% limits of agreement) of + 0.16 (−0.22 to + 0.54) and + 0.10 (−0.36 to + 0.56) with the iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope, respectively. iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope student observation concordance for optic disc colour (88.7 and 82.4%, respectively) and contour (68.3 and 74.2%, respectively) demonstrated low agreement with staff ophthalmologist findings. Student iPhone X observations demonstrated lower agreement with staff findings compared to direct ophthalmoscope observations for spontaneous venous pulsations (Cohen’s Kappa = −0.044 vs 0.099). CONCLUSION: Amongst medical trainees, optic disc visualization using an unmodified iPhone X was inferior to the direct ophthalmoscope. When able to visualize the optic nerve head, there was no significant difference in reported cup-to-disc ratio between modalities. However, both modalities demonstrated poor reliability in comparison to staff ophthalmologist findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9308475/ /pubmed/35871237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Ahmed, Yusuf Pereira, Austin Rai, Amrit S. Leung, Victoria C. Ahmed, Aadam Rai, Amandeep S. Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title | Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title_full | Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title_fullStr | Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title_short | Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iphone x |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedyusuf prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex AT pereiraaustin prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex AT raiamrits prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex AT leungvictoriac prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex AT ahmedaadam prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex AT raiamandeeps prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex |