Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X

PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Yusuf, Pereira, Austin, Rai, Amrit S., Leung, Victoria C., Ahmed, Aadam, Rai, Amandeep S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4
_version_ 1784752989823565824
author Ahmed, Yusuf
Pereira, Austin
Rai, Amrit S.
Leung, Victoria C.
Ahmed, Aadam
Rai, Amandeep S.
author_facet Ahmed, Yusuf
Pereira, Austin
Rai, Amrit S.
Leung, Victoria C.
Ahmed, Aadam
Rai, Amandeep S.
author_sort Ahmed, Yusuf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice medical trainees using either an unmodified iPhone X or standard direct ophthalmoscope. The primary outcome was the mean difference and degree of agreement in cup-to-disc ratio between student examination and the staff ophthalmologist’s cup-to-disc observation. RESULTS: A total of 18 medical students conducted 230 retinal examinations, 117 with the iPhone X and 113 with the direct ophthalmoscope. A greater proportion of students were unable to report cup-to-disc ratio using the iPhone X (81.2%) vs direct ophthalmoscope (30.1%). Student examination of cup-to-disc ratio led to a systematic bias (95% limits of agreement) of + 0.16 (−0.22 to + 0.54) and + 0.10 (−0.36 to + 0.56) with the iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope, respectively. iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope student observation concordance for optic disc colour (88.7 and 82.4%, respectively) and contour (68.3 and 74.2%, respectively) demonstrated low agreement with staff ophthalmologist findings. Student iPhone X observations demonstrated lower agreement with staff findings compared to direct ophthalmoscope observations for spontaneous venous pulsations (Cohen’s Kappa = −0.044 vs 0.099). CONCLUSION: Amongst medical trainees, optic disc visualization using an unmodified iPhone X was inferior to the direct ophthalmoscope. When able to visualize the optic nerve head, there was no significant difference in reported cup-to-disc ratio between modalities. However, both modalities demonstrated poor reliability in comparison to staff ophthalmologist findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9308475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93084752022-07-25 Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X Ahmed, Yusuf Pereira, Austin Rai, Amrit S. Leung, Victoria C. Ahmed, Aadam Rai, Amandeep S. Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate fundus examination accuracy of medical students when using an unmodified iPhone X or a direct ophthalmoscope in comparison to a staff ophthalmologist’s retinal examination. METHODS: In this prospective comparative analysis, patients underwent dilated fundus examination by novice medical trainees using either an unmodified iPhone X or standard direct ophthalmoscope. The primary outcome was the mean difference and degree of agreement in cup-to-disc ratio between student examination and the staff ophthalmologist’s cup-to-disc observation. RESULTS: A total of 18 medical students conducted 230 retinal examinations, 117 with the iPhone X and 113 with the direct ophthalmoscope. A greater proportion of students were unable to report cup-to-disc ratio using the iPhone X (81.2%) vs direct ophthalmoscope (30.1%). Student examination of cup-to-disc ratio led to a systematic bias (95% limits of agreement) of + 0.16 (−0.22 to + 0.54) and + 0.10 (−0.36 to + 0.56) with the iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope, respectively. iPhone X and direct ophthalmoscope student observation concordance for optic disc colour (88.7 and 82.4%, respectively) and contour (68.3 and 74.2%, respectively) demonstrated low agreement with staff ophthalmologist findings. Student iPhone X observations demonstrated lower agreement with staff findings compared to direct ophthalmoscope observations for spontaneous venous pulsations (Cohen’s Kappa = −0.044 vs 0.099). CONCLUSION: Amongst medical trainees, optic disc visualization using an unmodified iPhone X was inferior to the direct ophthalmoscope. When able to visualize the optic nerve head, there was no significant difference in reported cup-to-disc ratio between modalities. However, both modalities demonstrated poor reliability in comparison to staff ophthalmologist findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9308475/ /pubmed/35871237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ahmed, Yusuf
Pereira, Austin
Rai, Amrit S.
Leung, Victoria C.
Ahmed, Aadam
Rai, Amandeep S.
Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title_full Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title_short Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X
title_sort prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iphone x
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02377-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedyusuf prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex
AT pereiraaustin prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex
AT raiamrits prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex
AT leungvictoriac prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex
AT ahmedaadam prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex
AT raiamandeeps prospectiveevaluationofmedicalstudentaccuracyconductingdirectophthalmoscopywithanunmodifiediphonex