Cargando…
Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework
BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV remains a challenge, despite improved testing and treatment. Testing is often targeted at high-risk groups; workplace events might normalise testing and allow access to a wider population. The construction workforce has a number of risk factors for HIV. In the Test@...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5 |
_version_ | 1784752995240509440 |
---|---|
author | Somerset, Sarah Jones, Wendy Evans, Catrin Cirelli, Cecilia Mbang, Douglas Blake, Holly |
author_facet | Somerset, Sarah Jones, Wendy Evans, Catrin Cirelli, Cecilia Mbang, Douglas Blake, Holly |
author_sort | Somerset, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV remains a challenge, despite improved testing and treatment. Testing is often targeted at high-risk groups; workplace events might normalise testing and allow access to a wider population. The construction workforce has a number of risk factors for HIV. In the Test@Work study, HIV tests were delivered within general health checks to construction employees, with high uptake and acceptability. This paper reports on the experiences of construction managers and health professionals involved in Test@Work and explores the suitability of construction worksites as a venue for opt-in HIV testing. METHODS: Qualitative interviews (n = 24) were conducted with construction managers who had facilitated health check/HIV testing (n = 13), and delivery partners (n = 11) including i) healthcare volunteers who had delivered general health checks (n = 7) and, ii) HIV professionals who had conducted HIV testing (n = 4) at 21 Test@Work events held on construction sites. Interviews explored their experiences of these events and views towards HIV testing in the workplace. Exit questionnaires (n = 107) were completed by delivery partners after every event, providing qualitative data identifying facilitators and barriers to effective delivery. Thematic analysis identified themes that were mapped against a socioecological framework. RESULTS: Delivery partners reported high engagement of construction workers with workplace HIV testing, peer-to-peer encouragement for uptake, and value for accessibility of onsite testing. HIV professionals valued the opportunity to reach an untested population, many of whom had a poor understanding of their exposure to HIV risk. Managers valued the opportunity to offer workplace health checks to employees but some identified challenges with event planning, or provision of private facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The construction sector is complex with a largely male workforce. Providing worksite HIV testing and education to an untested population who have poor knowledge about HIV risk helped to normalise testing, encourage uptake and reduce HIV-related stigma. However, there are practical barriers to testing in the construction environment. Rapid testing may not be the most suitable approach given the challenges of maintaining confidentiality on construction worksites and alternatives should be explored. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9308504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93085042022-07-25 Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework Somerset, Sarah Jones, Wendy Evans, Catrin Cirelli, Cecilia Mbang, Douglas Blake, Holly BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV remains a challenge, despite improved testing and treatment. Testing is often targeted at high-risk groups; workplace events might normalise testing and allow access to a wider population. The construction workforce has a number of risk factors for HIV. In the Test@Work study, HIV tests were delivered within general health checks to construction employees, with high uptake and acceptability. This paper reports on the experiences of construction managers and health professionals involved in Test@Work and explores the suitability of construction worksites as a venue for opt-in HIV testing. METHODS: Qualitative interviews (n = 24) were conducted with construction managers who had facilitated health check/HIV testing (n = 13), and delivery partners (n = 11) including i) healthcare volunteers who had delivered general health checks (n = 7) and, ii) HIV professionals who had conducted HIV testing (n = 4) at 21 Test@Work events held on construction sites. Interviews explored their experiences of these events and views towards HIV testing in the workplace. Exit questionnaires (n = 107) were completed by delivery partners after every event, providing qualitative data identifying facilitators and barriers to effective delivery. Thematic analysis identified themes that were mapped against a socioecological framework. RESULTS: Delivery partners reported high engagement of construction workers with workplace HIV testing, peer-to-peer encouragement for uptake, and value for accessibility of onsite testing. HIV professionals valued the opportunity to reach an untested population, many of whom had a poor understanding of their exposure to HIV risk. Managers valued the opportunity to offer workplace health checks to employees but some identified challenges with event planning, or provision of private facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The construction sector is complex with a largely male workforce. Providing worksite HIV testing and education to an untested population who have poor knowledge about HIV risk helped to normalise testing, encourage uptake and reduce HIV-related stigma. However, there are practical barriers to testing in the construction environment. Rapid testing may not be the most suitable approach given the challenges of maintaining confidentiality on construction worksites and alternatives should be explored. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5. BioMed Central 2022-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9308504/ /pubmed/35870921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Somerset, Sarah Jones, Wendy Evans, Catrin Cirelli, Cecilia Mbang, Douglas Blake, Holly Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title | Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title_full | Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title_fullStr | Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title_short | Opt-in HIV testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
title_sort | opt-in hiv testing in construction workplaces: an exploration of its suitability, using the socioecological framework |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13787-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somersetsarah optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework AT joneswendy optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework AT evanscatrin optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework AT cirellicecilia optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework AT mbangdouglas optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework AT blakeholly optinhivtestinginconstructionworkplacesanexplorationofitssuitabilityusingthesocioecologicalframework |