Cargando…
General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital
BACKGROUND: Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is a set of data protection rules on the acquisition, storage, use, and access of personal data. GDPR came into effect in May 2018 when it was introduced across all 27 European Union (EU) member states and the European Economic Area (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02789-8 |
_version_ | 1784753012436107264 |
---|---|
author | Davey, Matthew G. O’Donnell, John P.M. Maher, Elizabeth McMenamin, Cliona McAnena, Peter F. Kerin, Michael J. Miller, Nicola Lowery, Aoife J. |
author_facet | Davey, Matthew G. O’Donnell, John P.M. Maher, Elizabeth McMenamin, Cliona McAnena, Peter F. Kerin, Michael J. Miller, Nicola Lowery, Aoife J. |
author_sort | Davey, Matthew G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is a set of data protection rules on the acquisition, storage, use, and access of personal data. GDPR came into effect in May 2018 when it was introduced across all 27 European Union (EU) member states and the European Economic Area (EEA). Maintaining compliance with this legislation has presented significant new challenges for ongoing clinical research. AIMS: To evaluate the knowledge and expectations of patients and doctors regarding GDPR and implications for future clinical research. METHODS: An anonymous 12-item questionnaire was circulated to patients and doctors at a University Teaching Hospital. Data analysis included descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Five hundred nine participants were included: 261 females (51.3%) and 248 males (48.7%). Three hundred fifty were patients (68.8%) and 159 were doctors (31.2%). Three hundred thirty-four participants were aware of GDPR (65.7%): 116 doctors (73.0%) and 218 patients (62.3%, P = 0.018). 71.1% of doctors were willing to allow their personal data to be processed anonymously as part of a clinical research project compared to 43.4% of patients (P < 0.001). 80.2% of patients believed explicit consent is needed before using personal data in clinical research in comparison to 60.4% of doctors (P < 0.001). Level of education impacted awareness of GDPR (P < 0.001); a higher level of education among patients increased GDPR familiarity (P < 0.001), however failed to impact doctor familiarity (P = 0.117). CONCLUSION: GDPR has introduced complexity to the processing and sharing of personal data among researchers. This study has identified differences in the perception of GDPR and willingness to consent to data being used in clinical research between doctors and patients. Measures to adequately inform prospective research participants on data processing and the evolving landscape of data protection regulation should be prioritised. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9308580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93085802022-07-25 General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital Davey, Matthew G. O’Donnell, John P.M. Maher, Elizabeth McMenamin, Cliona McAnena, Peter F. Kerin, Michael J. Miller, Nicola Lowery, Aoife J. Ir J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is a set of data protection rules on the acquisition, storage, use, and access of personal data. GDPR came into effect in May 2018 when it was introduced across all 27 European Union (EU) member states and the European Economic Area (EEA). Maintaining compliance with this legislation has presented significant new challenges for ongoing clinical research. AIMS: To evaluate the knowledge and expectations of patients and doctors regarding GDPR and implications for future clinical research. METHODS: An anonymous 12-item questionnaire was circulated to patients and doctors at a University Teaching Hospital. Data analysis included descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Five hundred nine participants were included: 261 females (51.3%) and 248 males (48.7%). Three hundred fifty were patients (68.8%) and 159 were doctors (31.2%). Three hundred thirty-four participants were aware of GDPR (65.7%): 116 doctors (73.0%) and 218 patients (62.3%, P = 0.018). 71.1% of doctors were willing to allow their personal data to be processed anonymously as part of a clinical research project compared to 43.4% of patients (P < 0.001). 80.2% of patients believed explicit consent is needed before using personal data in clinical research in comparison to 60.4% of doctors (P < 0.001). Level of education impacted awareness of GDPR (P < 0.001); a higher level of education among patients increased GDPR familiarity (P < 0.001), however failed to impact doctor familiarity (P = 0.117). CONCLUSION: GDPR has introduced complexity to the processing and sharing of personal data among researchers. This study has identified differences in the perception of GDPR and willingness to consent to data being used in clinical research between doctors and patients. Measures to adequately inform prospective research participants on data processing and the evolving landscape of data protection regulation should be prioritised. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9308580/ /pubmed/34595690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02789-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Davey, Matthew G. O’Donnell, John P.M. Maher, Elizabeth McMenamin, Cliona McAnena, Peter F. Kerin, Michael J. Miller, Nicola Lowery, Aoife J. General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title | General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title_full | General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title_fullStr | General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title_short | General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital |
title_sort | general data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an irish university teaching hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02789-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daveymatthewg generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT odonnelljohnpm generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT maherelizabeth generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT mcmenamincliona generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT mcanenapeterf generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT kerinmichaelj generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT millernicola generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital AT loweryaoifej generaldataprotectionregulations2018andclinicalresearchperspectivesofpatientsanddoctorsinanirishuniversityteachinghospital |