Cargando…
Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables
Biological data are often intrinsically hierarchical (e.g., species from different genera, plants within different mountain regions), which made mixed‐effects models a common analysis tool in ecology and evolution because they can account for the non‐independence. Many questions around their practic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9062 |
_version_ | 1784753070614249472 |
---|---|
author | Oberpriller, Johannes de Souza Leite, Melina Pichler, Maximilian |
author_facet | Oberpriller, Johannes de Souza Leite, Melina Pichler, Maximilian |
author_sort | Oberpriller, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological data are often intrinsically hierarchical (e.g., species from different genera, plants within different mountain regions), which made mixed‐effects models a common analysis tool in ecology and evolution because they can account for the non‐independence. Many questions around their practical applications are solved but one is still debated: Should we treat a grouping variable with a low number of levels as a random or fixed effect? In such situations, the variance estimate of the random effect can be imprecise, but it is unknown if this affects statistical power and type I error rates of the fixed effects of interest. Here, we analyzed the consequences of treating a grouping variable with 2–8 levels as fixed or random effect in correctly specified and alternative models (under‐ or overparametrized models). We calculated type I error rates and statistical power for all‐model specifications and quantified the influences of study design on these quantities. We found no influence of model choice on type I error rate and power on the population‐level effect (slope) for random intercept‐only models. However, with varying intercepts and slopes in the data‐generating process, using a random slope and intercept model, and switching to a fixed‐effects model, in case of a singular fit, avoids overconfidence in the results. Additionally, the number and difference between levels strongly influences power and type I error. We conclude that inferring the correct random‐effect structure is of great importance to obtain correct type I error rates. We encourage to start with a mixed‐effects model independent of the number of levels in the grouping variable and switch to a fixed‐effects model only in case of a singular fit. With these recommendations, we allow for more informative choices about study design and data analysis and make ecological inference with mixed‐effects models more robust for small number of levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9309037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93090372022-07-26 Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables Oberpriller, Johannes de Souza Leite, Melina Pichler, Maximilian Ecol Evol Research Articles Biological data are often intrinsically hierarchical (e.g., species from different genera, plants within different mountain regions), which made mixed‐effects models a common analysis tool in ecology and evolution because they can account for the non‐independence. Many questions around their practical applications are solved but one is still debated: Should we treat a grouping variable with a low number of levels as a random or fixed effect? In such situations, the variance estimate of the random effect can be imprecise, but it is unknown if this affects statistical power and type I error rates of the fixed effects of interest. Here, we analyzed the consequences of treating a grouping variable with 2–8 levels as fixed or random effect in correctly specified and alternative models (under‐ or overparametrized models). We calculated type I error rates and statistical power for all‐model specifications and quantified the influences of study design on these quantities. We found no influence of model choice on type I error rate and power on the population‐level effect (slope) for random intercept‐only models. However, with varying intercepts and slopes in the data‐generating process, using a random slope and intercept model, and switching to a fixed‐effects model, in case of a singular fit, avoids overconfidence in the results. Additionally, the number and difference between levels strongly influences power and type I error. We conclude that inferring the correct random‐effect structure is of great importance to obtain correct type I error rates. We encourage to start with a mixed‐effects model independent of the number of levels in the grouping variable and switch to a fixed‐effects model only in case of a singular fit. With these recommendations, we allow for more informative choices about study design and data analysis and make ecological inference with mixed‐effects models more robust for small number of levels. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9309037/ /pubmed/35898418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9062 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Oberpriller, Johannes de Souza Leite, Melina Pichler, Maximilian Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title | Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title_full | Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title_fullStr | Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title_short | Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
title_sort | fixed or random? on the reliability of mixed‐effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oberprillerjohannes fixedorrandomonthereliabilityofmixedeffectsmodelsforasmallnumberoflevelsingroupingvariables AT desouzaleitemelina fixedorrandomonthereliabilityofmixedeffectsmodelsforasmallnumberoflevelsingroupingvariables AT pichlermaximilian fixedorrandomonthereliabilityofmixedeffectsmodelsforasmallnumberoflevelsingroupingvariables |