Cargando…
Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234 |
_version_ | 1784753077012660224 |
---|---|
author | Magollah, Tabu Mungia Kim, Hyo-Rim Ko, Ji-Yun Park, Su-Yeon Kwon, Seo-Yeon Kim, Yu-Kyeong Lee, Ji-Hyo Seo, Yong-Soo Yang, Ji-Young Lee, Yang-Bong |
author_facet | Magollah, Tabu Mungia Kim, Hyo-Rim Ko, Ji-Yun Park, Su-Yeon Kwon, Seo-Yeon Kim, Yu-Kyeong Lee, Ji-Hyo Seo, Yong-Soo Yang, Ji-Young Lee, Yang-Bong |
author_sort | Magollah, Tabu Mungia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) for EC extraction. Our results showed that for the LLE method, addition of 15% NaCl improved the EC yield by 15%, and dichloromethane as the extraction solvent showed a slightly higher yield (about 5%) than chloroform. However, there was little difference in the yield when mixing was performed using an ultrasonic bath compared to a vortex mixer. Using response surface methodology with central composite design to analyze the ATPS results, optimal extraction was found to occur at 21.5°C for 2.8 h in the sample containing 70% alcohol and 15% phosphate, showing a recovery yield of 75.64%. This information can be applied to alcoholic beverages and other fermented food products to analyze EC with better extraction methods, depending on the types of food. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9309073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93090732022-08-01 Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine Magollah, Tabu Mungia Kim, Hyo-Rim Ko, Ji-Yun Park, Su-Yeon Kwon, Seo-Yeon Kim, Yu-Kyeong Lee, Ji-Hyo Seo, Yong-Soo Yang, Ji-Young Lee, Yang-Bong Prev Nutr Food Sci Original Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) for EC extraction. Our results showed that for the LLE method, addition of 15% NaCl improved the EC yield by 15%, and dichloromethane as the extraction solvent showed a slightly higher yield (about 5%) than chloroform. However, there was little difference in the yield when mixing was performed using an ultrasonic bath compared to a vortex mixer. Using response surface methodology with central composite design to analyze the ATPS results, optimal extraction was found to occur at 21.5°C for 2.8 h in the sample containing 70% alcohol and 15% phosphate, showing a recovery yield of 75.64%. This information can be applied to alcoholic beverages and other fermented food products to analyze EC with better extraction methods, depending on the types of food. The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9309073/ /pubmed/35919573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. All rights Reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Magollah, Tabu Mungia Kim, Hyo-Rim Ko, Ji-Yun Park, Su-Yeon Kwon, Seo-Yeon Kim, Yu-Kyeong Lee, Ji-Hyo Seo, Yong-Soo Yang, Ji-Young Lee, Yang-Bong Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title | Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title_full | Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title_short | Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine |
title_sort | comparison of extraction methods and extraction optimization in aqueous two-phase system for ethyl carbamate analysis in model systems for maesil wine |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magollahtabumungia comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT kimhyorim comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT kojiyun comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT parksuyeon comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT kwonseoyeon comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT kimyukyeong comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT leejihyo comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT seoyongsoo comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT yangjiyoung comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine AT leeyangbong comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine |