Cargando…

Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine

Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magollah, Tabu Mungia, Kim, Hyo-Rim, Ko, Ji-Yun, Park, Su-Yeon, Kwon, Seo-Yeon, Kim, Yu-Kyeong, Lee, Ji-Hyo, Seo, Yong-Soo, Yang, Ji-Young, Lee, Yang-Bong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234
_version_ 1784753077012660224
author Magollah, Tabu Mungia
Kim, Hyo-Rim
Ko, Ji-Yun
Park, Su-Yeon
Kwon, Seo-Yeon
Kim, Yu-Kyeong
Lee, Ji-Hyo
Seo, Yong-Soo
Yang, Ji-Young
Lee, Yang-Bong
author_facet Magollah, Tabu Mungia
Kim, Hyo-Rim
Ko, Ji-Yun
Park, Su-Yeon
Kwon, Seo-Yeon
Kim, Yu-Kyeong
Lee, Ji-Hyo
Seo, Yong-Soo
Yang, Ji-Young
Lee, Yang-Bong
author_sort Magollah, Tabu Mungia
collection PubMed
description Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) for EC extraction. Our results showed that for the LLE method, addition of 15% NaCl improved the EC yield by 15%, and dichloromethane as the extraction solvent showed a slightly higher yield (about 5%) than chloroform. However, there was little difference in the yield when mixing was performed using an ultrasonic bath compared to a vortex mixer. Using response surface methodology with central composite design to analyze the ATPS results, optimal extraction was found to occur at 21.5°C for 2.8 h in the sample containing 70% alcohol and 15% phosphate, showing a recovery yield of 75.64%. This information can be applied to alcoholic beverages and other fermented food products to analyze EC with better extraction methods, depending on the types of food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93090732022-08-01 Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine Magollah, Tabu Mungia Kim, Hyo-Rim Ko, Ji-Yun Park, Su-Yeon Kwon, Seo-Yeon Kim, Yu-Kyeong Lee, Ji-Hyo Seo, Yong-Soo Yang, Ji-Young Lee, Yang-Bong Prev Nutr Food Sci Original Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a known carcinogen, and therefore its intake is regulated internationally. The objectives of this study were to compare the EC recovery yields under different liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) conditions and to investigate the optimum conditions of the aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) for EC extraction. Our results showed that for the LLE method, addition of 15% NaCl improved the EC yield by 15%, and dichloromethane as the extraction solvent showed a slightly higher yield (about 5%) than chloroform. However, there was little difference in the yield when mixing was performed using an ultrasonic bath compared to a vortex mixer. Using response surface methodology with central composite design to analyze the ATPS results, optimal extraction was found to occur at 21.5°C for 2.8 h in the sample containing 70% alcohol and 15% phosphate, showing a recovery yield of 75.64%. This information can be applied to alcoholic beverages and other fermented food products to analyze EC with better extraction methods, depending on the types of food. The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9309073/ /pubmed/35919573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. All rights Reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original
Magollah, Tabu Mungia
Kim, Hyo-Rim
Ko, Ji-Yun
Park, Su-Yeon
Kwon, Seo-Yeon
Kim, Yu-Kyeong
Lee, Ji-Hyo
Seo, Yong-Soo
Yang, Ji-Young
Lee, Yang-Bong
Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title_full Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title_fullStr Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title_short Comparison of Extraction Methods and Extraction Optimization in Aqueous Two-Phase System for Ethyl Carbamate Analysis in Model Systems for Maesil Wine
title_sort comparison of extraction methods and extraction optimization in aqueous two-phase system for ethyl carbamate analysis in model systems for maesil wine
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.234
work_keys_str_mv AT magollahtabumungia comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT kimhyorim comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT kojiyun comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT parksuyeon comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT kwonseoyeon comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT kimyukyeong comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT leejihyo comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT seoyongsoo comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT yangjiyoung comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine
AT leeyangbong comparisonofextractionmethodsandextractionoptimizationinaqueoustwophasesystemforethylcarbamateanalysisinmodelsystemsformaesilwine