Cargando…

Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study

PURPOSE: In recent years, the preferred fixation method for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has changed from cemented to cementless. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from the cemented versus cementless techniques two- and twelve-months post-oper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gifstad, Tone, Nordskar, Jørgen Jebens, Egeberg, Tarjei, Wik, Tina Strømdal, Winther, Siri Bjørgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06617-5
_version_ 1784753093212110848
author Gifstad, Tone
Nordskar, Jørgen Jebens
Egeberg, Tarjei
Wik, Tina Strømdal
Winther, Siri Bjørgen
author_facet Gifstad, Tone
Nordskar, Jørgen Jebens
Egeberg, Tarjei
Wik, Tina Strømdal
Winther, Siri Bjørgen
author_sort Gifstad, Tone
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In recent years, the preferred fixation method for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has changed from cemented to cementless. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from the cemented versus cementless techniques two- and twelve-months post-operation. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, 187 cemented and 261 cementless UKAs were included based on an institutional registry. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee System™ (Zimmer Biomet, Bridgend, United Kingdom) was used for all patients. Three experienced surgeons performed all procedures. Data were collected pre- and peroperatively, and at two- and twelve-months postoperatively. PROMs included pain (evaluated on a numeric rating scale [NRS] during activity and at rest), and knee function (evaluated with the disease-specific short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-PS]). Patients also rated postoperative joint function (better, unchanged, uncertain or worse) and were asked, “based on your experience to date, would you go through the surgery again?”. Duration of surgery was noted and revisions during the first post-operative year were evaluated. RESULTS: The cemented group reported significantly lower activity-related pain at both two- and twelve-month follow-up. This was also the case for pain at rest at twelve-month follow-up, and KOOS-PS at two-month follow-up. Duration of surgery (adjusted for surgeon differences) was eight minutes less on average with the cementless technique. Eleven prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) were found following the cementless fixation technique compared to three using the cemented implant. CONCLUSION: UKA cases with cemented implants had lower pain scores during activity two and twelve months after surgery compared with those who had cementless implants. Differences in favor of the cemented group were also found for pain at rest one year after surgery and for KOOS-PS two months after. Surgery was significantly shorter in duration in the cementless group, but a relatively high number of PJIs were found in that same group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93091422022-07-26 Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study Gifstad, Tone Nordskar, Jørgen Jebens Egeberg, Tarjei Wik, Tina Strømdal Winther, Siri Bjørgen Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: In recent years, the preferred fixation method for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has changed from cemented to cementless. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from the cemented versus cementless techniques two- and twelve-months post-operation. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, 187 cemented and 261 cementless UKAs were included based on an institutional registry. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee System™ (Zimmer Biomet, Bridgend, United Kingdom) was used for all patients. Three experienced surgeons performed all procedures. Data were collected pre- and peroperatively, and at two- and twelve-months postoperatively. PROMs included pain (evaluated on a numeric rating scale [NRS] during activity and at rest), and knee function (evaluated with the disease-specific short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-PS]). Patients also rated postoperative joint function (better, unchanged, uncertain or worse) and were asked, “based on your experience to date, would you go through the surgery again?”. Duration of surgery was noted and revisions during the first post-operative year were evaluated. RESULTS: The cemented group reported significantly lower activity-related pain at both two- and twelve-month follow-up. This was also the case for pain at rest at twelve-month follow-up, and KOOS-PS at two-month follow-up. Duration of surgery (adjusted for surgeon differences) was eight minutes less on average with the cementless technique. Eleven prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) were found following the cementless fixation technique compared to three using the cemented implant. CONCLUSION: UKA cases with cemented implants had lower pain scores during activity two and twelve months after surgery compared with those who had cementless implants. Differences in favor of the cemented group were also found for pain at rest one year after surgery and for KOOS-PS two months after. Surgery was significantly shorter in duration in the cementless group, but a relatively high number of PJIs were found in that same group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9309142/ /pubmed/34036403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06617-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee
Gifstad, Tone
Nordskar, Jørgen Jebens
Egeberg, Tarjei
Wik, Tina Strømdal
Winther, Siri Bjørgen
Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title_full Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title_fullStr Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title_full_unstemmed Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title_short Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
title_sort cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06617-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gifstadtone cementlessunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyresultsinhigherpainlevelscomparedtothecementedtechniqueaprospectiveregisterstudy
AT nordskarjørgenjebens cementlessunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyresultsinhigherpainlevelscomparedtothecementedtechniqueaprospectiveregisterstudy
AT egebergtarjei cementlessunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyresultsinhigherpainlevelscomparedtothecementedtechniqueaprospectiveregisterstudy
AT wiktinastrømdal cementlessunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyresultsinhigherpainlevelscomparedtothecementedtechniqueaprospectiveregisterstudy
AT winthersiribjørgen cementlessunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyresultsinhigherpainlevelscomparedtothecementedtechniqueaprospectiveregisterstudy