Cargando…

Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma

To evaluate the value of texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differential diagnosis of thymic carcinoma and thymic lymphoma. Sixty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed (thymic carcinoma, n = 32; thymic lymphoma, n = 37) were enrolled in this retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jia-jia, Shen, Jie, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Fen, Yuan, Mei, Xu, Hai, Yu, Tong-fu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16393-y
_version_ 1784753097118056448
author Zhu, Jia-jia
Shen, Jie
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Fen
Yuan, Mei
Xu, Hai
Yu, Tong-fu
author_facet Zhu, Jia-jia
Shen, Jie
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Fen
Yuan, Mei
Xu, Hai
Yu, Tong-fu
author_sort Zhu, Jia-jia
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the value of texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differential diagnosis of thymic carcinoma and thymic lymphoma. Sixty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed (thymic carcinoma, n = 32; thymic lymphoma, n = 37) were enrolled in this retrospective study. K(trans), K(ep) and V(e) maps were automatically generated, and texture features were extracted, including mean, median, 5th/95th percentile, skewness, kurtosis, diff-variance, diff-entropy, contrast and entropy. The differences in parameters between the two groups were compared and the diagnostic efficacy was calculated. The K(trans)-related significant features yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.769 (sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 51.4%) for the differentiation between thymic carcinoma and thymic lymphoma. The K(ep)-related significant features yielded an AUC of 0.780 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 62.2%). The V(e)-related significant features yielded an AUC of 0.807 (sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 78.4%). The combination of DCE-MRI textural features yielded an AUC of 0.962 (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 89.2%). Five parameters were screened out, including age, K(trans)-entropy, K(ep)-entropy, V(e)-entropy, and V(e)-P95. The combination of these five parameters yielded the best discrimination efficiency (AUC of 0.943, 93.7% sensitivity, 81.1% specificity). Texture analysis of DCE-MRI may be helpful to distinguish thymic carcinoma from thymic lymphoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93091582022-07-26 Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma Zhu, Jia-jia Shen, Jie Zhang, Wei Wang, Fen Yuan, Mei Xu, Hai Yu, Tong-fu Sci Rep Article To evaluate the value of texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differential diagnosis of thymic carcinoma and thymic lymphoma. Sixty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed (thymic carcinoma, n = 32; thymic lymphoma, n = 37) were enrolled in this retrospective study. K(trans), K(ep) and V(e) maps were automatically generated, and texture features were extracted, including mean, median, 5th/95th percentile, skewness, kurtosis, diff-variance, diff-entropy, contrast and entropy. The differences in parameters between the two groups were compared and the diagnostic efficacy was calculated. The K(trans)-related significant features yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.769 (sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 51.4%) for the differentiation between thymic carcinoma and thymic lymphoma. The K(ep)-related significant features yielded an AUC of 0.780 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 62.2%). The V(e)-related significant features yielded an AUC of 0.807 (sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 78.4%). The combination of DCE-MRI textural features yielded an AUC of 0.962 (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 89.2%). Five parameters were screened out, including age, K(trans)-entropy, K(ep)-entropy, V(e)-entropy, and V(e)-P95. The combination of these five parameters yielded the best discrimination efficiency (AUC of 0.943, 93.7% sensitivity, 81.1% specificity). Texture analysis of DCE-MRI may be helpful to distinguish thymic carcinoma from thymic lymphoma. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9309158/ /pubmed/35871647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16393-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Jia-jia
Shen, Jie
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Fen
Yuan, Mei
Xu, Hai
Yu, Tong-fu
Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title_full Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title_fullStr Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title_short Quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
title_sort quantitative texture analysis based on dynamic contrast enhanced mri for differential diagnosis between primary thymic lymphoma from thymic carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16393-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujiajia quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT shenjie quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT zhangwei quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT wangfen quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT yuanmei quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT xuhai quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma
AT yutongfu quantitativetextureanalysisbasedondynamiccontrastenhancedmrifordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprimarythymiclymphomafromthymiccarcinoma