Cargando…

Development and Application of Global Health Events-Mental Stress Scale for Assessment of Medical Staff’s Acute Mental Stress Responses

BACKGROUND: Medical workers have been increasingly involved in emergent public health events, which can lead to severe stress. However, no standardized, officially recognized, unified tool exists for mental distress measurement in medical workers who experienced the public health events. PURPOSE: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Xin-Ying, Zheng, Shao-Yan, Lin, Zhen-Su, Chen, Su-Zhi, Zhu, Wei-Yi, Huang, Jia-Jia, Zheng, Ze-Li, Zhou, Yu-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898432
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S369958
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Medical workers have been increasingly involved in emergent public health events, which can lead to severe stress. However, no standardized, officially recognized, unified tool exists for mental distress measurement in medical workers who experienced the public health events. PURPOSE: In the present study, we propose the Global Health Events-Mental Stress Scale (GHE-MSS), as a revised version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revision (IES-R), for assessment of medical workers’ acute mental stress responses within one month and their chronic mental stress responses within six months after major health events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IES-R was slightly modified, developed, and its reliability and validity were tested using the Delphi survey, primary survey with 115 participants, formal survey with 300 participants, and clinical evaluation with 566 participants. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a promising validity of the scale. The values of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, the Spearman-Brown coefficient, and the retested Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale applied for the clinical evaluation were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.98, respectively, which confirmed a good internal consistency and stability. The results of the goodness-of-fit test indicated a good adaptation of the model. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between the GHE-MSS and the PCL-C, which had a correlation coefficient of 0.68 (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: GHE-MSS can be applied with a promising reliability and validity for the assessment of the acute mental stress response of medical workers experiencing public health events. This method can also be used for the screening of mental stress-associated disorders.