Cargando…
Association Between Metformin Use and the Risk, Prognosis of Gynecologic Cancer
BACKGROUND: For gynecological cancer patients, the beneficial effect of metformin use remains controversial due to inconsistent results of published articles. By conducting a meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin in reducing the risk and improving the survival of gynecological...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.942380 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: For gynecological cancer patients, the beneficial effect of metformin use remains controversial due to inconsistent results of published articles. By conducting a meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin in reducing the risk and improving the survival of gynecological cancer among women with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Articles exploring association between metformin use and the risk, as well as prognosis of gynecologic cancer in DM, were searched in the databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, EBSCO, and PROQUEST. Articles were published before May 2022. All the studies were conducted using STATA 12.0 software. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed no significant association between metformin use and risk of gynecologic cancer in DM with a random effects model [odds ratio (ORs)/relative risk (RR) = 0.91, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.77 to 1.08, I(2) = 84.2%, p < 0.001]. Metformin use was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of gynecologic cancer in DM with random effects models [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.49–0.74, I(2) = 55.2%, p = 0.002; PFS: HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.33–0.91, I(2) = 69.1%, p = 0.006], whereas no significant association was showed between metformin use and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gynecologic cancer in DM with random effects models (RFS: HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.30–1.18, I(2) = 73.7%, p = 0.010; CSS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.43–1.41, I(2) = 72.4%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated that metformin may be a useful adjuvant agent for gynecological cancer with DM, especially for patients with ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer. |
---|