Cargando…

Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig

The admixture of domestic pig into French wild boar populations has been monitored since the 1980s thanks to the existence of a cytogenetic difference between the two sub‐species. The number of chromosomes is 2n = 36 in wild boar and 2n = 38 in pig, respectively. This difference makes it possible to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mary, Nicolas, Iannuccelli, Nathalie, Petit, Geoffrey, Bonnet, Nathalie, Pinton, Alain, Barasc, Harmonie, Faure, Amélie, Calgaro, Anne, Grosbois, Vladimir, Servin, Bertrand, Ducos, Alain, Riquet, Juliette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13432
_version_ 1784753168224092160
author Mary, Nicolas
Iannuccelli, Nathalie
Petit, Geoffrey
Bonnet, Nathalie
Pinton, Alain
Barasc, Harmonie
Faure, Amélie
Calgaro, Anne
Grosbois, Vladimir
Servin, Bertrand
Ducos, Alain
Riquet, Juliette
author_facet Mary, Nicolas
Iannuccelli, Nathalie
Petit, Geoffrey
Bonnet, Nathalie
Pinton, Alain
Barasc, Harmonie
Faure, Amélie
Calgaro, Anne
Grosbois, Vladimir
Servin, Bertrand
Ducos, Alain
Riquet, Juliette
author_sort Mary, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description The admixture of domestic pig into French wild boar populations has been monitored since the 1980s thanks to the existence of a cytogenetic difference between the two sub‐species. The number of chromosomes is 2n = 36 in wild boar and 2n = 38 in pig, respectively. This difference makes it possible to assign the “hybrid” status to wild boar individuals controlled with 37 or 38 chromosomes. However, it does not make it possible to determine the timing of the hybridization(s), nor to guarantee the absence of domestic admixture in an animal with 2n = 36 chromosomes. In order to analyze hybridization in greater detail and to avoid the inherent limitations of the cytogenetic approach, 362 wild boars (WB) recently collected in different French geographical areas and in different environments (farms, free ranging in protected or unprotected areas, animals with 2n = 36, 37 or 38 chromosomes) were genotyped on a 70K SNP chip. Principal component analyses allowed the identification of 13 “outliers” (3.6%), for which the proportion of the genome of “domestic” origin was greater than 40% (Admixture analyses). These animals were probably recent hybrids, having Asian domestic pig ancestry for most of them. For the remaining 349 animals studied, the proportion of the genome of “wild” origin varied between 83% and 100% (median: 94%). This proportion varied significantly depending on how the wild boar populations were managed. Local ancestry analyses revealed adaptive introgression from domestic pig, suggesting a critical role of genetic admixture in improving the fitness and population growth of WB. Overall, our results show that the methods used to monitor the domestic genetic contributions to wild boar populations should evolve in order to limit the level of admixture between the two gene pools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93094622022-07-26 Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig Mary, Nicolas Iannuccelli, Nathalie Petit, Geoffrey Bonnet, Nathalie Pinton, Alain Barasc, Harmonie Faure, Amélie Calgaro, Anne Grosbois, Vladimir Servin, Bertrand Ducos, Alain Riquet, Juliette Evol Appl Original Articles The admixture of domestic pig into French wild boar populations has been monitored since the 1980s thanks to the existence of a cytogenetic difference between the two sub‐species. The number of chromosomes is 2n = 36 in wild boar and 2n = 38 in pig, respectively. This difference makes it possible to assign the “hybrid” status to wild boar individuals controlled with 37 or 38 chromosomes. However, it does not make it possible to determine the timing of the hybridization(s), nor to guarantee the absence of domestic admixture in an animal with 2n = 36 chromosomes. In order to analyze hybridization in greater detail and to avoid the inherent limitations of the cytogenetic approach, 362 wild boars (WB) recently collected in different French geographical areas and in different environments (farms, free ranging in protected or unprotected areas, animals with 2n = 36, 37 or 38 chromosomes) were genotyped on a 70K SNP chip. Principal component analyses allowed the identification of 13 “outliers” (3.6%), for which the proportion of the genome of “domestic” origin was greater than 40% (Admixture analyses). These animals were probably recent hybrids, having Asian domestic pig ancestry for most of them. For the remaining 349 animals studied, the proportion of the genome of “wild” origin varied between 83% and 100% (median: 94%). This proportion varied significantly depending on how the wild boar populations were managed. Local ancestry analyses revealed adaptive introgression from domestic pig, suggesting a critical role of genetic admixture in improving the fitness and population growth of WB. Overall, our results show that the methods used to monitor the domestic genetic contributions to wild boar populations should evolve in order to limit the level of admixture between the two gene pools. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9309462/ /pubmed/35899256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13432 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mary, Nicolas
Iannuccelli, Nathalie
Petit, Geoffrey
Bonnet, Nathalie
Pinton, Alain
Barasc, Harmonie
Faure, Amélie
Calgaro, Anne
Grosbois, Vladimir
Servin, Bertrand
Ducos, Alain
Riquet, Juliette
Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title_full Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title_fullStr Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title_full_unstemmed Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title_short Genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
title_sort genome‐wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13432
work_keys_str_mv AT marynicolas genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT iannuccellinathalie genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT petitgeoffrey genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT bonnetnathalie genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT pintonalain genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT barascharmonie genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT faureamelie genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT calgaroanne genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT grosboisvladimir genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT servinbertrand genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT ducosalain genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig
AT riquetjuliette genomewideanalysisofhybridizationinwildboarpopulationsrevealsadaptiveintrogressionfromdomesticpig