Cargando…
Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory managem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551 |
_version_ | 1784753174434807808 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Chihong Liu, Bo Li, Jing Li, Sisi Liu, Yan Guo, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiumin |
author_facet | Zhao, Chihong Liu, Bo Li, Jing Li, Sisi Liu, Yan Guo, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiumin |
author_sort | Zhao, Chihong |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9309487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93094872022-07-26 Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China Zhao, Chihong Liu, Bo Li, Jing Li, Sisi Liu, Yan Guo, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiumin Front Public Health Public Health In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9309487/ /pubmed/35899162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Liu, Li, Li, Liu, Guo and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zhao, Chihong Liu, Bo Li, Jing Li, Sisi Liu, Yan Guo, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiumin Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title | Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title_full | Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title_short | Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China |
title_sort | evaluation of laboratory management based on a combination of topsis and rsr methods: a study in 7 provincial laboratories of china |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaochihong evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT liubo evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT lijing evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT lisisi evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT liuyan evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT guoyuanyuan evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina AT zhangxiumin evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina |