Cargando…

Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China

In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory managem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Chihong, Liu, Bo, Li, Jing, Li, Sisi, Liu, Yan, Guo, Yuanyuan, Zhang, Xiumin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551
_version_ 1784753174434807808
author Zhao, Chihong
Liu, Bo
Li, Jing
Li, Sisi
Liu, Yan
Guo, Yuanyuan
Zhang, Xiumin
author_facet Zhao, Chihong
Liu, Bo
Li, Jing
Li, Sisi
Liu, Yan
Guo, Yuanyuan
Zhang, Xiumin
author_sort Zhao, Chihong
collection PubMed
description In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93094872022-07-26 Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China Zhao, Chihong Liu, Bo Li, Jing Li, Sisi Liu, Yan Guo, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiumin Front Public Health Public Health In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9309487/ /pubmed/35899162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Liu, Li, Li, Liu, Guo and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zhao, Chihong
Liu, Bo
Li, Jing
Li, Sisi
Liu, Yan
Guo, Yuanyuan
Zhang, Xiumin
Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title_full Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title_fullStr Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title_short Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China
title_sort evaluation of laboratory management based on a combination of topsis and rsr methods: a study in 7 provincial laboratories of china
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaochihong evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT liubo evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT lijing evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT lisisi evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT liuyan evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT guoyuanyuan evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina
AT zhangxiumin evaluationoflaboratorymanagementbasedonacombinationoftopsisandrsrmethodsastudyin7provinciallaboratoriesofchina