Cargando…

Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia

In chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), treatment-free remission (TFR) is defined as maintaining a major molecular response (MMR) without a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), such as imatinib (IM). Several studies have investigated the safety of the first TFR (TFR(1)) attempt and suggested recommendati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eunjung, Hwang, Eo-Jin, Lee, Junghye, Kim, Dae-Young, Kim, Jae-Young, Kim, Dong-Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2022.100817
_version_ 1784753217608876032
author Kim, Eunjung
Hwang, Eo-Jin
Lee, Junghye
Kim, Dae-Young
Kim, Jae-Young
Kim, Dong-Wook
author_facet Kim, Eunjung
Hwang, Eo-Jin
Lee, Junghye
Kim, Dae-Young
Kim, Jae-Young
Kim, Dong-Wook
author_sort Kim, Eunjung
collection PubMed
description In chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), treatment-free remission (TFR) is defined as maintaining a major molecular response (MMR) without a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), such as imatinib (IM). Several studies have investigated the safety of the first TFR (TFR(1)) attempt and suggested recommendation guidelines for such an attempt. However, the plausibility and predictive factors for a second TFR (TFR(2)) have yet to be reported. The present study included 21 patients in chronic myeloid leukemia who participated in twice repeated treatment stop attempts. We develop a mathematical model to analyze and explain the outcomes of TFR(2). Our mathematical model framework can explain patient-specific molecular response dynamics. Fitting the model to longitudinal BCR-ABL1 transcripts from the patients generated patient-specific parameters. Binary tree decision analyses of the model parameters suggested a model based predictive binary classification factor that separated patients into low- and high-risk groups of TFR(2) attempts with an overall accuracy of 76.2% (sensitivity of 81.1% and specificity of 69.9%). The low-risk group maintained a median TFR(2) of 28.2 months, while the high-risk group relapsed at a median time of 3.25 months. Further, our model predicted a patient-specific optimal IM treatment duration before the second IM stop that could achieve the desired TFR(2) (e.g., 5 years).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93096662022-08-01 Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia Kim, Eunjung Hwang, Eo-Jin Lee, Junghye Kim, Dae-Young Kim, Jae-Young Kim, Dong-Wook Neoplasia Original Research In chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), treatment-free remission (TFR) is defined as maintaining a major molecular response (MMR) without a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), such as imatinib (IM). Several studies have investigated the safety of the first TFR (TFR(1)) attempt and suggested recommendation guidelines for such an attempt. However, the plausibility and predictive factors for a second TFR (TFR(2)) have yet to be reported. The present study included 21 patients in chronic myeloid leukemia who participated in twice repeated treatment stop attempts. We develop a mathematical model to analyze and explain the outcomes of TFR(2). Our mathematical model framework can explain patient-specific molecular response dynamics. Fitting the model to longitudinal BCR-ABL1 transcripts from the patients generated patient-specific parameters. Binary tree decision analyses of the model parameters suggested a model based predictive binary classification factor that separated patients into low- and high-risk groups of TFR(2) attempts with an overall accuracy of 76.2% (sensitivity of 81.1% and specificity of 69.9%). The low-risk group maintained a median TFR(2) of 28.2 months, while the high-risk group relapsed at a median time of 3.25 months. Further, our model predicted a patient-specific optimal IM treatment duration before the second IM stop that could achieve the desired TFR(2) (e.g., 5 years). Neoplasia Press 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9309666/ /pubmed/35878453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2022.100817 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kim, Eunjung
Hwang, Eo-Jin
Lee, Junghye
Kim, Dae-Young
Kim, Jae-Young
Kim, Dong-Wook
Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title_full Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title_fullStr Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title_short Patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
title_sort patient-specific molecular response dynamics can predict the possibility of relapse during the second treatment-free remission attempt in chronic myelogenous leukemia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2022.100817
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeunjung patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia
AT hwangeojin patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia
AT leejunghye patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia
AT kimdaeyoung patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia
AT kimjaeyoung patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia
AT kimdongwook patientspecificmolecularresponsedynamicscanpredictthepossibilityofrelapseduringthesecondtreatmentfreeremissionattemptinchronicmyelogenousleukemia