Cargando…

Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors

Background: Chronic nerve compression is the most common indication for nerve surgery. However, the clinical diagnosis still relies on surrogate parameters since devices for direct nerve compression pressure measurement (DNCPM) are clinically unavailable yet. Objectives: To review previous approache...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daeschler, Simeon C., Wienbruch, Rebecca, Bursacovschi, Catalina, Zimmermann, Kim Sophie, Nemariam, Selam Bekure, Harhaus, Leila, Kneser, Ulrich, Dehé, Alfons, Bittner, Achim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.868396
_version_ 1784753248791429120
author Daeschler, Simeon C.
Wienbruch, Rebecca
Bursacovschi, Catalina
Zimmermann, Kim Sophie
Nemariam, Selam Bekure
Harhaus, Leila
Kneser, Ulrich
Dehé, Alfons
Bittner, Achim
author_facet Daeschler, Simeon C.
Wienbruch, Rebecca
Bursacovschi, Catalina
Zimmermann, Kim Sophie
Nemariam, Selam Bekure
Harhaus, Leila
Kneser, Ulrich
Dehé, Alfons
Bittner, Achim
author_sort Daeschler, Simeon C.
collection PubMed
description Background: Chronic nerve compression is the most common indication for nerve surgery. However, the clinical diagnosis still relies on surrogate parameters since devices for direct nerve compression pressure measurement (DNCPM) are clinically unavailable yet. Objectives: To review previous approaches to DNCPM and evaluate presently available microsensor systems for their feasibility and reliability in preclinical nerve compression models. Methods: A scoping literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A subsequent market research aimed at identifying commercially available sensor systems potentially suitable for DNCPM. Sensors were evaluated for feasibility and safety of perineural sensor positioning, tissue compatibility and measurement reliability in a synthetic nerve compression model and an ex-vivo chicken leg model. Results: A scoping literature review identified 197 potentially eligible studies of which 65 were included in the analysis. Previous approaches to DNCPM predominantly used pressure sensing catheters designed for fluid- or intra-compartmental pressure measurement. A market research identified two piezoresistive sensor systems (IntraSense, SMi, United States; Mikro-Cath, Millar, United States) as potentially suitable for intraoperative DNCPM. In both preclinical models, the detected compression pressure differed significantly between sensors and systems showed substantial measurement variability with a median percent coefficient of variation between 15.5% and 32%. Sensor position was accountable for up to 99.1% of the variance. Conclusion: Measurement variability caused by unreliable sensor positioning is a key limitation of presently available sensors when applied for nerve compression measurements. Redesigned systems with small, flat-shaped and longitudinally oriented sensors and dedicated introducers would facilitate sensor positioning and therefore may allow for reliable measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93097972022-07-26 Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors Daeschler, Simeon C. Wienbruch, Rebecca Bursacovschi, Catalina Zimmermann, Kim Sophie Nemariam, Selam Bekure Harhaus, Leila Kneser, Ulrich Dehé, Alfons Bittner, Achim Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: Chronic nerve compression is the most common indication for nerve surgery. However, the clinical diagnosis still relies on surrogate parameters since devices for direct nerve compression pressure measurement (DNCPM) are clinically unavailable yet. Objectives: To review previous approaches to DNCPM and evaluate presently available microsensor systems for their feasibility and reliability in preclinical nerve compression models. Methods: A scoping literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A subsequent market research aimed at identifying commercially available sensor systems potentially suitable for DNCPM. Sensors were evaluated for feasibility and safety of perineural sensor positioning, tissue compatibility and measurement reliability in a synthetic nerve compression model and an ex-vivo chicken leg model. Results: A scoping literature review identified 197 potentially eligible studies of which 65 were included in the analysis. Previous approaches to DNCPM predominantly used pressure sensing catheters designed for fluid- or intra-compartmental pressure measurement. A market research identified two piezoresistive sensor systems (IntraSense, SMi, United States; Mikro-Cath, Millar, United States) as potentially suitable for intraoperative DNCPM. In both preclinical models, the detected compression pressure differed significantly between sensors and systems showed substantial measurement variability with a median percent coefficient of variation between 15.5% and 32%. Sensor position was accountable for up to 99.1% of the variance. Conclusion: Measurement variability caused by unreliable sensor positioning is a key limitation of presently available sensors when applied for nerve compression measurements. Redesigned systems with small, flat-shaped and longitudinally oriented sensors and dedicated introducers would facilitate sensor positioning and therefore may allow for reliable measurements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9309797/ /pubmed/35898643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.868396 Text en Copyright © 2022 Daeschler, Wienbruch, Bursacovschi, Zimmermann, Nemariam, Harhaus, Kneser, Dehé and Bittner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Daeschler, Simeon C.
Wienbruch, Rebecca
Bursacovschi, Catalina
Zimmermann, Kim Sophie
Nemariam, Selam Bekure
Harhaus, Leila
Kneser, Ulrich
Dehé, Alfons
Bittner, Achim
Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title_full Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title_fullStr Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title_full_unstemmed Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title_short Sensor-Based Nerve Compression Measurement: A Scoping Review of Current Concepts and a Preclinical Evaluation of Commercial Microsensors
title_sort sensor-based nerve compression measurement: a scoping review of current concepts and a preclinical evaluation of commercial microsensors
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.868396
work_keys_str_mv AT daeschlersimeonc sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT wienbruchrebecca sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT bursacovschicatalina sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT zimmermannkimsophie sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT nemariamselambekure sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT harhausleila sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT kneserulrich sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT dehealfons sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors
AT bittnerachim sensorbasednervecompressionmeasurementascopingreviewofcurrentconceptsandapreclinicalevaluationofcommercialmicrosensors