Cargando…

Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study

Actinic keratoses are a chronic condition in ultraviolet-damaged skin, with a risk of progressing to invasive skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the preventive potential of field-directed repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. A randomized trial was perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KARRER, Sigrid, SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus, PHILIPP-DORMSTON, Wolfgang G., GERBER, Peter A., PRAGER, Welf, DATZ, Elisabeth, ZEMAN, Florian, MÜLLER, Karolina, KOLLER, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3717
_version_ 1784753258357587968
author KARRER, Sigrid
SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus
PHILIPP-DORMSTON, Wolfgang G.
GERBER, Peter A.
PRAGER, Welf
DATZ, Elisabeth
ZEMAN, Florian
MÜLLER, Karolina
KOLLER, Michael
author_facet KARRER, Sigrid
SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus
PHILIPP-DORMSTON, Wolfgang G.
GERBER, Peter A.
PRAGER, Welf
DATZ, Elisabeth
ZEMAN, Florian
MÜLLER, Karolina
KOLLER, Michael
author_sort KARRER, Sigrid
collection PubMed
description Actinic keratoses are a chronic condition in ultraviolet-damaged skin, with a risk of progressing to invasive skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the preventive potential of field-directed repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. A randomized trial was performed, including 58 patients with ≥5 actinic keratoses on photodamaged facial skin, who received either 5 full-face sessions of day-light photodynamic therapy within a period of 2 years or lesion-directed cryosurgery. Primary outcome was the mean cumulative number of new actinic keratoses developed between visits 2 and 6 (visit 6 being a follow-up). This outcome was lower after daylight photodynamic therapy (7.7) compared with cryosurgery (10.2), but the difference did not reach significance (–2.5, 95% confidence interval –6.2 to 1.2; p=0.18). Several signs of photoageing (fine lines, pigmentation, roughness, erythema, sebaceous gland hyperplasia) were significantly reduced after daylight photodynamic therapy, but not after cryosurgery. Significantly less pain and fewer side-effects were reported during day-light photodynamic therapy than during cryosurgery. This study found that repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy had photo-rejuvenating effects. However, the prevention of actinic keratoses by this therapy could not be proven in a statistically reliable manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93098352022-10-20 Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study KARRER, Sigrid SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus PHILIPP-DORMSTON, Wolfgang G. GERBER, Peter A. PRAGER, Welf DATZ, Elisabeth ZEMAN, Florian MÜLLER, Karolina KOLLER, Michael Acta Derm Venereol Clinical Report Actinic keratoses are a chronic condition in ultraviolet-damaged skin, with a risk of progressing to invasive skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the preventive potential of field-directed repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. A randomized trial was performed, including 58 patients with ≥5 actinic keratoses on photodamaged facial skin, who received either 5 full-face sessions of day-light photodynamic therapy within a period of 2 years or lesion-directed cryosurgery. Primary outcome was the mean cumulative number of new actinic keratoses developed between visits 2 and 6 (visit 6 being a follow-up). This outcome was lower after daylight photodynamic therapy (7.7) compared with cryosurgery (10.2), but the difference did not reach significance (–2.5, 95% confidence interval –6.2 to 1.2; p=0.18). Several signs of photoageing (fine lines, pigmentation, roughness, erythema, sebaceous gland hyperplasia) were significantly reduced after daylight photodynamic therapy, but not after cryosurgery. Significantly less pain and fewer side-effects were reported during day-light photodynamic therapy than during cryosurgery. This study found that repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy had photo-rejuvenating effects. However, the prevention of actinic keratoses by this therapy could not be proven in a statistically reliable manner. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9309835/ /pubmed/33313936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3717 Text en © 2021 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license
spellingShingle Clinical Report
KARRER, Sigrid
SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus
PHILIPP-DORMSTON, Wolfgang G.
GERBER, Peter A.
PRAGER, Welf
DATZ, Elisabeth
ZEMAN, Florian
MÜLLER, Karolina
KOLLER, Michael
Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title_full Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title_fullStr Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title_short Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study
title_sort repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy versus cryosurgery for prevention of actinic keratoses in photodamaged facial skin: a prospective, randomized controlled multicentre two-armed study
topic Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3717
work_keys_str_mv AT karrersigrid repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT szeimiesrolfmarkus repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT philippdormstonwolfgangg repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT gerberpetera repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT pragerwelf repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT datzelisabeth repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT zemanflorian repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT mullerkarolina repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy
AT kollermichael repetitivedaylightphotodynamictherapyversuscryosurgeryforpreventionofactinickeratosesinphotodamagedfacialskinaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticentretwoarmedstudy