Cargando…
Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was use...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690 |
_version_ | 1784753265503633408 |
---|---|
author | EZZEDINE, Khaled PAINCHAULT, Caroline BRIGNONE, Melanie |
author_facet | EZZEDINE, Khaled PAINCHAULT, Caroline BRIGNONE, Melanie |
author_sort | EZZEDINE, Khaled |
collection | PubMed |
description | A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate field-directed therapies (5-fluorouracil formulations, diclofenac sodium, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, 5-aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate plus photodynamic therapy) using complete clearance or partial clearance of actinic keratoses lesions, and adverse event-related withdrawals as a proxy of acceptability. Of 2,863 references identified, 75 trials reported in 151 publications were included. In summary, comparative network meta-analysis evaluation showed that 5-fluorouracil formulations were the most efficacious interventions examined. 5-fluorouracil 4%, which was recently approved, showed a comparable efficacy profile to 5-fluorouracil 5%, and had satisfactory acceptability outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9309865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93098652022-10-20 Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses EZZEDINE, Khaled PAINCHAULT, Caroline BRIGNONE, Melanie Acta Derm Venereol Clinical Report A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate field-directed therapies (5-fluorouracil formulations, diclofenac sodium, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, 5-aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate plus photodynamic therapy) using complete clearance or partial clearance of actinic keratoses lesions, and adverse event-related withdrawals as a proxy of acceptability. Of 2,863 references identified, 75 trials reported in 151 publications were included. In summary, comparative network meta-analysis evaluation showed that 5-fluorouracil formulations were the most efficacious interventions examined. 5-fluorouracil 4%, which was recently approved, showed a comparable efficacy profile to 5-fluorouracil 5%, and had satisfactory acceptability outcomes. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9309865/ /pubmed/33170301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690 Text en © 2021 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license |
spellingShingle | Clinical Report EZZEDINE, Khaled PAINCHAULT, Caroline BRIGNONE, Melanie Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title | Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title_full | Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title_fullStr | Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title_short | Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses |
title_sort | systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and acceptability of interventions in actinic keratoses |
topic | Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezzedinekhaled systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses AT painchaultcaroline systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses AT brignonemelanie systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses |