Cargando…

Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: EZZEDINE, Khaled, PAINCHAULT, Caroline, BRIGNONE, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690
_version_ 1784753265503633408
author EZZEDINE, Khaled
PAINCHAULT, Caroline
BRIGNONE, Melanie
author_facet EZZEDINE, Khaled
PAINCHAULT, Caroline
BRIGNONE, Melanie
author_sort EZZEDINE, Khaled
collection PubMed
description A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate field-directed therapies (5-fluorouracil formulations, diclofenac sodium, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, 5-aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate plus photodynamic therapy) using complete clearance or partial clearance of actinic keratoses lesions, and adverse event-related withdrawals as a proxy of acceptability. Of 2,863 references identified, 75 trials reported in 151 publications were included. In summary, comparative network meta-analysis evaluation showed that 5-fluorouracil formulations were the most efficacious interventions examined. 5-fluorouracil 4%, which was recently approved, showed a comparable efficacy profile to 5-fluorouracil 5%, and had satisfactory acceptability outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9309865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93098652022-10-20 Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses EZZEDINE, Khaled PAINCHAULT, Caroline BRIGNONE, Melanie Acta Derm Venereol Clinical Report A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and qualitatively assess randomized controlled trials in immunocompetent patients ≥ 18 years with head-region lesions of actinic keratoses who were treated with field-directed, lesion-directed and other therapies. Network meta-analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate field-directed therapies (5-fluorouracil formulations, diclofenac sodium, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, 5-aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate plus photodynamic therapy) using complete clearance or partial clearance of actinic keratoses lesions, and adverse event-related withdrawals as a proxy of acceptability. Of 2,863 references identified, 75 trials reported in 151 publications were included. In summary, comparative network meta-analysis evaluation showed that 5-fluorouracil formulations were the most efficacious interventions examined. 5-fluorouracil 4%, which was recently approved, showed a comparable efficacy profile to 5-fluorouracil 5%, and had satisfactory acceptability outcomes. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9309865/ /pubmed/33170301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690 Text en © 2021 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license
spellingShingle Clinical Report
EZZEDINE, Khaled
PAINCHAULT, Caroline
BRIGNONE, Melanie
Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title_full Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title_fullStr Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title_short Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses
title_sort systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and acceptability of interventions in actinic keratoses
topic Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3690
work_keys_str_mv AT ezzedinekhaled systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses
AT painchaultcaroline systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses
AT brignonemelanie systematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandacceptabilityofinterventionsinactinickeratoses